You can quote 'anthakkaalam' or any kaalam if it is 'convenient' for you ! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by thamiz
Printable View
You can quote 'anthakkaalam' or any kaalam if it is 'convenient' for you ! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by thamiz
:yes:
Sorry if this has been already posted.
http://hayyram.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post_9463.html
Wow! What a wonderful article! I feel stregthened and invigorated! Thank you very much, Kambar_Kannagi! :D And excellent continuation of the author in the comments section too! :clap: :clap: :clap:
:D PP ma'am.Quote:
Originally Posted by pavalamani pragasam
The author has turned off the right-click function, can't copy paste the contents here. So, others have to go to the blog to read it. :)
That is no problem! What a sensible, level-headed person! Admirable!
I am sure few of u would not agree with me, when I say, in the name of "attacking the kushbooites and the anti cultural mass", folks who wanna preserve the culture goes lil beyond 'cultural and clean way to express or talk'. There are only very few exceptions ...sad.
I better be prepared to get replies talking on "injection pains...but it cures" or "mullai mulaal edukkanam" examples.
very sad.
shabbaa...ஜனநாயகத்துல பொறுமை ரொம்ப அவசியம். அதுக்கு ஒரு பயிற்சா இந்த கட்டுரையைப் படிக்கலாம்.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kambar_Kannagi
What are you worried of SP? Your progressive thoughts? Don't!
Increasingly there are more people with open minds. Thats the power of evolution. :lol:
:rotfl:Quote:
Originally Posted by P_R
Progressive thoughts? :huh:
Thanks to the "OPEN MINDS" they are able to digest ANYTHING pro or against culture. Not much diff in language of communication. Content varies though :D
"Oh dont judge the book by its cover" :lol2:
Sorry, I didn't get the joke... :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by joe
இது மாதிரி ஒரு மொக்கை கட்டுரையை படிக்கிறதால பொறுமை வளரும் .அது ஜனநாயகத்துக்கு நல்லது -ங்குறாரு 8-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kambar_Kannagi
அவரை விடுவோம். நீங்களும் அதனை 'மொக்கை' கட்டுரை என்குறீர்களா??? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by joe
The author is intentionally missing the point. He sees the courts' limited role and still expects courts to be the pronouncers of morality !Quote:
Originally Posted by Kambar_Kannagi
To paraphrase the exact sentence : "Just because something is not illegal does not mean people can do whatever they want. Or atleast such a notion should not be propogated". Whose job is that ? The courts ?
Then he proceeds to launch on all the all too familiar attack on Khushboo's locus standi to make such observations. (as if it will make a difference if the statement were made by a erudite social scientist who is the epitome of virtue !).
What exactly did you expect the court to have done in this case ?
If we really think the law should pronounce moral diktats, then we should strongly support the Taliban regime. They were enforcing morality and fighting western decadence. i.e. it was not left to the people to choose with their best judegment and institutions like the family acting as natural checks for guidance. Instead they said : "certain things are sacred and set in stone, they never ever change with time, we will lose our identity, so we have to be firm and enforce with a iron first. Pretty much put into the minds of the people the fear of transgression. Stoning of women who falter from their roles as kudumba kuthuviLakkus would be perfectly understandable. Honor killing of adulterous women who tarnish the institution of 'family' and promote debasement of values, should be welcomed wholehearrtedly. After all they all mean well. They wanted to protect institutions as we have known them all along, to remain unchanged.
This debate is not about whether something is right-or-wrong. It is about what should be dictated by law ? Where do we draw a line ?
Infact , ’மொக்கை’ -ன்னு அவர் சொல்லல .நானே உரிமையா சேர்த்துகிட்டது தான் . :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kambar_Kannagi
:exactly:Quote:
Originally Posted by P_R
எல்லா சட்டங்களும் தனிமனித ஒழுக்க நெறியிலும் அடங்கும் .ஆனால் எல்லா தனிமனித ஒழுக்க நெறிகளும் சட்டத்தினுள் அடங்க வேண்டுமென்ற அவசியம் இல்லை.
PR :thumbsup:
idhukku mela thelivaa inimEl solla mudiyaadhu
P_R and Joe - fair enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by joe
இந்த விசயத்தில் 'அது ஒரு கருத்து' என்ற பட்சத்தில் நீதிமன்றம் அந்த நடிகையை விட்டுவிட்டது.
அதுவே, குஷ்புவின் 'கருத்து' சமுதாயத்தில் கடுகளவு தாக்கத்தையாவது ஏற்படுத்துமானால், அது தவறல்லவோ...
இப்போ, சினிமாவில் புகைபிடிக்கும் காட்சி தவிர்க்கப் பட வேண்டும் என்று கோஷம் போடுகிறார்களே, அது போல ஆகிவிட்டது இதுவும்...
I read a very disgusting thing in the german newspapers yesterday and it is nagging me to hell.
A woman of 40 who is suffering from PVS(Permanent vegetative state, a sort of wake coma)and lying in this state for atleast 2 years was found 5 months pregnant. How can some one be so ruthless and heartless to rape a person in such state. Now the debate is going on whether the pregnancy should be terminated or not.
I simply wish that the culprit could be found through DNA analysis and castrated without any sort of anasthesia
I think all rapists should be castrated without any second thought.
I read through all the posts and somehow get this very funny feeling that pre-marital sex is OK, as long as we do not openly express support.
The typical Indian Culture in all its glory - it is OK to do, but not OK to talk about it.
:banghead: :banghead:
Rajan
Dont believe your feelings!They might be misguiding you! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by PatchyBoy
I think you and few others are getting a wrong perception (on purpose?) that people who disagree with Kushboo's statement are all supporting violent attack on her! That aint TRUE!Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
Really?Quote:
Originally Posted by P_R
What about the judgment/verdict by the judges?
Is that about right or worng or it is for having fun just like your posts here? :lol:
I thought the whole discussion started right from the judges' verdict as RIGHT or WRONG :lol:
I guess you got lost as you are having too much fun! :roll:
thamiz, the judgement meant: "the law has no business here. Pre-marital sex is not illegal". The law refused to dictate morality in this particular case.Quote:
Originally Posted by thamiz
This is as pertinent as it can be possibly get. Nevertheless I am having fun.
The debate on whether the judgement is RIGHT or WRONG - is for some reason being seen as whether pre-marital sex is right and wrong. Perhaps anyone who lauds the judgement is seen as a reckless libertine advocating for some universalization of debauchery. This leap is exactly what I find amusing :lol2:
If the court had stopped with just passing the judgement about the legality of the wonderful person's wonderful statements one would have had nothing to complain besides silently concluding the corrupt levels of money power. But the court went beyond limits of propriety, responsibility and dignity by wantonly, flippantly teasing, deriding the complainants with atrocious quotes and posers. Just unpardonable. The court has a dignity to maintain as a wing of the large country's governing body. It cannot afford to cast such careless, irresponsible, indecent comments. Utterly unjustifiable and shameful! Just as the blogger had rightly pointed out we care least about the acts of C.Sundar's family- wife, daughters and all- I can never forget my anger when I read very long ago in Kumudam about Gavaskar's interview of what a responsible parents he and his wife were by placing condoms in the shelf of their teenage son.
The glitterati is taking the general public as easy target for their fun games as some of the participants in this thread are doing! This is a serious matter that is being discussed and perverse arguments cannot change the seriousness of the issue or daunt the concerned members- be they called talibans, moral police or samooga aarvalarkaL- to back away from their strong convictions by all such diverting, deliberate shooting at a tangent techniques.
Today several bombs were detected from the Kannur graveyard North Kerala. They were concealed in the concrete tombs. :huh:
The police neutralized all except a couple of bombs.
What is happening to our people? :think:
app-engine!
You are right, it is not worth wasting my time with some people here.
I deleted the contents and keep off with some hubbers! :D
Well, time to unlock :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by app_engine
thamizh :shock:
என்னங்க இப்படி சூடாயிட்டீங்க, பொறுமை, பொறுமை!
நீங்கள் இப்படிப்பிரதிபலிப்பதன் மூலம் மறைமுகமாக உங்களுக்கே தாம் தீங்கு செய்கிறீர்கள் :-(
முதலாவது கேள்வி - இந்தக்குஷ்பு அம்மையார் எப்போது தமிழ்ப்பண்பாட்டின் "அதிகாரப்பூர்வ விமர்சகர்" ஆயித்தொலைந்தார்? ஏன் இவருக்கு இவ்வளவு முக்கியத்துவம்?
அவரது அரைவேக்காட்டுப்பிதற்றல்களுக்கு அதீத முக்கியத்துவம் கொடுத்து, அனாவசியமான பிரதிபலிப்புகள் செய்ததால் தானே? "அவ கெடக்கா வெத்து வேட்டு, நாம யாரு, நம்ம வரலாறு என்ன, பண்பு என்ன, ஒழுக்கம் என்ன"ன்னு நம்வழியில் போய்க்கொண்டிருந்தாலே போதுமாக இருந்தது.
அரசியலில் புகழ் பெறுவதற்காக சில விஷமிகள் செய்த வலைக்குள் பொதுமக்கள் ஏன் விழ வேண்டும்? (ஒரு விதத்தில் இவங்க எல்லோரும் இன்னும் இந்த அம்மையாருக்கு மனதில் ஒரு கோயில் வச்சிருக்காங்களோ?)
பச்சையாகச்சொல்லப்போனால், இந்த அம்மாவுக்குக்கோயில் கட்டுனவனுக்கும், இவுங்க கருத்தை எதிர்த்து சண்டை போடுறவுங்களுக்கும் ஒரு வித்தியாசமும் கிடையாது. ரெண்டு பேரும் தேவையில்லாமல் இவருக்கு முக்கியத்துவம் கொடுக்குறாங்க :-(
Please save your energy for more important things in life :-)
app-engine!
anyway, I deleted the contents of my last post and modified and am off to this thread! Thanks for your concern. I should care less about this issue and the open-minded kuhsboo worshippes! :D
நன்றி, தமிழ்!
அடுத்து, பவளமணி அவர்களின் கருத்தான
மிகச்சரியானது.Quote:
The court has a dignity to maintain as a wing of the large country's governing body. It cannot afford to cast such careless, irresponsible, indecent comments. Utterly unjustifiable and shameful!
ஏற்கனவே ஒரு கேனத்தனமான கேஸு (அதையெல்லாம் கீழேயே "நேரத்தைப்பாழாக்காதீர்கள்"ன்னு திட்டித்தூரப்போடாதது பெரிய அசிங்கம்.)
சரி, அவங்க பண்ணின தப்பை இவங்களாவது சரி செய்து, இந்த மாதிரி வேலையத்த காரியங்களை செய்ய வேண்டாம்னு சட்டுப்புட்டுன்னு தீர்மானிக்காமல் இன்னும் தள்ளிப்போட்டுக்கிட்டு இருக்காங்க.
செய்ய வேண்டிய வேலை அது தானே ஒழிய, திருமணத்துக்கு முன்னான பாலுறவு சட்டபூர்வமா இல்லையா கிருஷ்ணர் என்ன செய்தார் ராமர் என்ன செய்தார் எல்லாம் பேசுவது அல்ல - இவையெல்லாம் நீதிமன்றத்துக்கு வேண்டாத திண்ணைப்பேச்சு .:shock:
கேஸுகள் மலை போல் குவிந்து, பொது மக்களுக்கு நேரத்தில் நீதி கிடைக்காதிருக்க இந்த மாதிரி திண்ணைப்பேச்சுக்கோஷ்டிகள் தான் காரணம் :shock:
P_R,Quote:
Originally Posted by P_R
Out of curiosity, I just checked this news report :
http://beta.thehindu.com/news/nation...icle285361.ece
Actually, if one goes by this report, the SC has to focus on whether the ex-actress was correct or not in "stating her opinion" (on anything). Or whether the tons of "criminal cases" accepted against her in the various TN courts are idiotic or not!
That should be an open and shut case, regardless of the issue being discussed :-)
Neither the HC nor the SC has done that but keep focusing on an entirely different topic :?
(i.e. of the rights and wrongs of her original statement / effects of that on public etc. Come on, who is she, Indian president? Or wife of Gandhiji to take her comments on people's morals so seriously?)
I think I'll never understand our judicial system...These fellows simply enjoy wasting public money, while doing nothing worthwhile to real victims of various crimes in the society!
தள்ளிப்போடுறது / தள்ளி வைக்கிறது தான் இவங்களோட 99% நேரத்து வேலை :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by the hindu
Now, the whole media seems to get worked up on the "observation" aka thiNNaippEchchu but doesn't care about the lower courts / HC / SC wasting tons of time and resources on such a trivial matter as an individual opinion and protests to that from vested interests :-(
Tell me about it. I lost faith in our judicial system a while ago. I was the unfortunate victim of the irony of what is our judicial system.Quote:
Originally Posted by app_engine
One time, I travelled all the way from Bangalore to Hyderabad to appear in court and was told at 10:30 AM that the judge has decided to take the day off and was given another date. :banghead:
That date came, but I could not make it as I met with an accident and broke my leg.. and viola.. the judge issues a non-bailable warrant for my arrest for non-appearance :banghead:
So much for justice.
Rajan
Eh! Rajan, appo enna, Chanchalguda-ullernthu thaan post pannureengala!Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajan
:lol:
just kidding...light aa eduthukonga!
Hmmm, interesting. I thought the perception here was that people who agree Kushboo can make a statement are proponents of pre-marital sex.Quote:
Originally Posted by thamiz
Badri, :wave: !
:rotfl:
from making judgements on Kushboo, now we have descended to passing judgements on people posting in this thread.
nalla munnEtram! keep it up!
Athan yeppaiyo descend panniyache! :lol: :lol: :lol: You are late, NOV. :lol: :lol: :lol: