Shah Rukh Khan

**Deep_Secrets** · 21st April 2005, 12:28 PM

Originally Posted by sanju

Originally Posted by Deep_Secrets

Lata Mangeshkar's favorite actor is Amir Khan

...Anyway, I liked Shah's acting in K3G and Chaahat...he was super...

funny

, thanks for your kind information, as i wasnt aware of the fact that lata mangeshkar is the one who decides the best actor of the country. amir khan is a good actor, but please dont compare him to a leagend like kamal.

Oh!

I am not comparing him with Kamal or I am not even saying he is my favorite...Just found it funny that Lata's favorite is him. :P

How did Kamal come in here? I thought this was a thread on Shahrukh Khan? I didn't even read the posts before me :P

**Google Adsense** · 21st April 2005 12:28 PM

**sanju** · 21st April 2005, 12:34 PM

thats nice. i like amir, as the guy has great screen presence. i still believe that sharukhs best film is bazigar. by the way this thread is not about amir too.

**Deep_Secrets** · 22nd April 2005, 03:26 AM

People were discussing Kamal or Hritikh in here before I posted :P :P :P

**bambal_khan** · 23rd April 2005, 07:43 PM

please dont compare kamal hassan with aamir khan. there is no comparision. kamal hassan is an old fool who overacts and makes really crappy movies which are super flops. On the other hand aamir khan is the most versatile actor in India and has had so many hits to his credit. aamir khan also has the padmashee award, to inform the black tamil moron surya who think only the ugly egocentric flop actor kamal hassan has it.
face it, kamal hassan just overacts and uses the same expressions over and over again. except for tamil nadu no one gives a shit about kamal hassan anywhere in india, whereas aamir khan is very popular all over india.

**Surya** · 23rd April 2005, 11:43 PM

Bambal ji,
This obviously shows ur lack on knoledge in Kamal Hassan films!

Question: How come Kamal has won a Padmashree, being mainly a South Indian Actor, and Amir Kahn has not, being a northie??

**HindustaniLadka** · 24th April 2005, 08:50 AM

Guys, dont get into regional warfare in the movies forum. All actors have their strong and weak points. Anyway, comparing the Shahrukh and Kamal Hasan is like comparing apples and oranges.

Bambal, dont bring skin color into this. There are many Tamils with very fair skin and there are also many Northern Indians with dark skin...so the assumption that all Tamils have dark skin is idiotic. For example, Hema Malini is a Tamil...but she has fair skin and Abishek Bachan is from Northern India, but he has dark skin.

**sanju** · 24th April 2005, 12:11 PM

Originally Posted by bambal_khan

please dont compare kamal hassan with aamir khan. there is no comparision. kamal hassan is an old fool who overacts and makes really crappy movies which are super flops. On the other hand aamir khan is the most versatile actor in India and has had so many hits to his credit. aamir khan also has the padmashee award, to inform the black tamil moron surya who think only the ugly egocentric flop actor kamal hassan has it.
face it, kamal hassan just overacts and uses the same expressions over and over again. except for tamil nadu no one gives a **** about kamal hassan anywhere in india, whereas aamir khan is very popular all over india.

this is not the spirit. of course you can argue, but please mind your language.

**knightracer81** · 28th April 2005, 08:18 PM

Shah Rukh is certainly not a versatile actor!!!! If he is a great actor , he should get at least one National Award. Well its not the think abt the National Award . He always has the same image in all his movies - the same oh cho cute ...cho chweet stuff!!!!!!!!!!

The same romantic stuff in all his movies. He also tends to overact !!!! I was laughing when I saw him do the emotional and shocking scene when the boy dies -in ASHOKA.

His got attitude. thts all. The only outstanding movies I feel of his are
Darr, Bazzigar, Anjaam, DDLJ , Devdas, thts it. He has overacted to the core in Ram Jaane, Duplicate, Baadshah, the list is long. He BUYS his Filmfare awards.

For 2000 FilmFare awards, when Hritik Roshan got maximum awards.... Shah Rukh was given Critics award for PBDH OR SOME MOVIE EVEN WHEN SANJAY DUTT DESERVED IT 100% FOR HIS MINDBLOWING PERFORMANCES IN MISSION KASHMIR AND VAASTAV. ANIL KAPOOR FOR PUKAR. BUT ANIL WAS REWARDED THRU THE PROPER WAY WHEN HE GOT HIS NATIONAL AWARD FOR PUKAR.

FOR ZEE AWARDS 2003 , WHEN HRITIK GOT BEST ACTOR KMG , SHAH RUKH GOT SPECIAL WARD FOR KAL HO NA HO . THE THING IS EVEN WHEN BEST ACTOR PRIZES ARE GIVEN TO OTHER ACTORS , SHAH RUKH WILL ALWAYS GET SOME CONSOLATION!!!!! WHAT THE HELL IS THIS!!!! Salman was GOOD in TERE NAAM

FOR 2004 AGAIN SHAH RUKH IS GETTING AWARDS FOR MAIN HOON NAA , VEER ZARA , THE USUAL SAME STUFF. EVEN WHEN AMITABH Bachan GAVE EXPLOSIVE PERFORMANCES IN Khakee, Dev.
Akshay Kumar was excellent in Mujse Shaadi Karoge and Aitraaz and even Khakee.

Now I have understood one thing, even if any actor acts superbly in any movie , he will never get an award as long as Shah Rukh Khan has a release that year. Tch tch very bad. No wonder AAMIR KHAN DOES'NT BELIEVE IN AWARDS!!!!!!

**Surya** · 29th April 2005, 12:09 AM

I"m not a big SRK fan. But I saw Swadesh yesterday!

Excellent movie!! Not for SRK. I personally think that Hrithik would have been better in that role. But the movie was great. And SRK had very little to do with it. But excellent movie. MHN was a good movie, I liked SRK in that one.

**sanju** · 29th April 2005, 12:09 AM

filmfare, zee awards were always considers the popularity of the stars. and sharukh is the greatest star of hindi films. so how can be an award ceremony be complete without him. in 2004, actually it was amitabh who deserved the filmfare awards for his powerpacked perfomances in khakee and dev. so filmfare awards doesnt count towards the calibre of an actor. sharukh is a good actor but can never be compared with amitabh or naseruddin shah.