View Poll Results: Does the intention of the artist matter

Voters
4. You may not vote on this poll
  • Always

    1 25.00%
  • Never

    1 25.00%
  • It depends

    2 50.00%
Results 1 to 10 of 101

Thread: Intentional Fallacy

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Moderator Platinum Hubber P_R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    10,036
    Post Thanks / Like

    Intentional Fallacy

    Quote Originally Posted by [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_fallacy
    wikipedia[/url]]Intentional fallacy, in literary criticism, addresses the assumption that the meaning intended by the author of a literary work is of primary importance. By characterizing this assumption as a "fallacy," a critic suggests that the author's intention is not important. The term is an important principle of New Criticism and was first used by W.K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley in their essay "The Intentional Fallacy" (1946 rev. 1954): "the design or intention of the author is neither available nor desirable as a standard for judging the success of a work of literary art." The phrase "intentional fallacy" is somewhat ambiguous, but it means "a fallacy about intent" and not "a fallacy committed on purpose."
    What sayst thou ?
    மூவா? முதல்வா! இனியெம்மைச் சோரேலே

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •