Why stupidly postdate it?
Quote:
What is the use of Maraimalai predating to 3rd Cen CE
What is the stupid use of Krishnamoorthy dating it to 8th and 9th century? What is he trying to acheive? Did this man say why he could not accept Maraimalai AdigaL's date since it was written many years ago? Did he ever read Maraimalai's book?
Naan Marai is always Vedas
Dear Friends,
Mala earlier linked to a website dating Manickavasagar to 7th Century.
Maraimalai's book has been totally rejected and no Serious History oriented author regards the works of these authors such as Maraimalai, Appadurai, Pavanar on Linguistics. The Last two has written 1000 Page Commentaries for Tirukural. The Award winning Authors and articles on Kural are linked in Tamil Literature threads an None uses these meanining less false interprtations.
Your blabbering that Sanskrit words are Tamil and Mis reading Tholkappiam have been replied with Authors of Highest Authorities and you still repeat like a Drunken. A Donkey can be taken near Water, but has to Drink by itself.
Tho.Po.Mi. former Vice Chancelor's quote that Sangam is Sanskrit is given already.
The Word Computer is Pure tamil- Kaniththal + Puhuththal + tharavugal has brought Computer, if this is acceptablem then one can think of reading your Foolish brashings.
Vedam is from Sanskrit root Vid of Vidya, means Knowledge, and your foolish repeats dont make any meaning.
As for Kodungallore- Chennai University HOD of Archeological Dept, refers that they have received the Virgin Soil without Human Inhabitaion by 8th Century in all the surrounding areas of Kodungallore.
Mala's foolishness- I cant put a full article for Copyright issues and that I want friends to buy those books. Meaninglessly looking for Odd
hangover clearly tells you do not have any case.
Pavanar, Maraimalai, Tho.po.MI, Mathiwanan, Mu.va and Kalignar are few who have said Marai in Sangam and Kural are Vedas.
Re: Rigkrit and Sanskrit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bis_mala
Sanskrit is an invented hybrid language, for liturgical purposes.
Rigkrit differs basically from Sanskrit. The term Sanskrit is sometimes loosely applied to even language which pre-existed, e.g. Pali.
There is no evidence that Rigkrit was ever in ordinary speech. It was used in chanting. It was therefore a manthavathis' language. Sanskrit was also never in ordinary speech.
Sanskrit does not have its own lexical base, as more than half of its words are from Dravidian. According to Dr M Lahavery, more than 1/3.
It has also borrowed heavily from the Munda languages.
Today we are able to trace even those words of doubtful origin to be from Dravidian.
It is wrong to say that Sanskrit is Vadamozi or vadachol. Vadamizi or vadachol refers to vaduku. It can also mean "maraththadi " language. It is said that it was developed in KeraLa and Karnataka.
Vedavyasan was of fisherman descent. There is no evidence to claim that he lived before Tolkaapiyar.
The Tamils spread Sanskrit in South East Asia.
Sanskrit. as its name implies, is clearly an invented language.
Rigkrit and Sanskrit had no writing system. All was borrowed from Dravidian.
Please discuss.
Thanks for info, mala! :)
Re: Naan Marai is always Sangam
Quote:
Originally Posted by devapriya
Dear Dsath,
Sagnam. i.e., the presence of 3 Sangams all have no proofs, based on a Single song of Irayanar Agaporulurai, of 9th Cen, the names given for Pulavars of 2nd Sangam, majoritily are the names from the present collection belong to 200BCE- 200CE.
The origin of the word Sangam is Sanskrit, and Tholkappiyam (100CE) clearly tells Tamil word cannot start by Sa. Kural has hardly 4 Kurals starts with sa, i.e., the law is valid till 250CE., exception are Sanskrit words as Tholkappiyar tell, when you write Sanskrit- Vadasol- remove Vada Scripts and (Vadaezuththu voriye).
Those of us who have been put from roof tops about Legendry items such as Sangam or Meaningless predating of TholKappiyam and meaningless back dating of Vedas, it would be very difficult to accept the Scientific Truths.
The Sangam Lit. liberally uses Vedic Legends, such as Thiru Murugatrupadai for Muruga Birth or all the Avathars of Vishnu in Paripadal, and paripadal even names Samaveda. Mathurai Kanchi refers a Sanskrit Assembly in Kanchipuram. Mankmekhalai even makes it much more clear that Anthanars used Sanskrit.
Both Sanskrit and Tamil are One of the Oldest Languages of the world, and as per the Editor of Tami Lexicon from Chennai University Prof.Burrows.,RigVedas jave 20 Tamil words, other Speculate much more.
Prof. Hart is clear that Tamil has Burrowed more Sanskrit words than the other way round, but later Sanskrit burrowed Poetic Styles.
Chennai University has to employ Europeans only for this reason, that They cannot keep on bluffs against world Univesities such as theThani Tamil School. My quotes in Previous page in Tamil would help you much.
Wikipedia, is more of Secular and Trust worthy, but needs cross checking in rare cases.
Now i am no expert and don't know which words in Tamil and Sanskrit are borrowed from each other. But how can we dismiss something as a legend by quoting a highly questionable article. The reference given in the article actually invalidates its contents. I am still skeptic abt the article and its claims.
Abt wikipedia, i have come across some other articles (not related to the topic in discussion) which are way off mark.