Maybe Rajini of 70's and early 80's, but nowadays his inclination to make Normal characters into 'his vazhi' will go against normalization itself, no?
Maybe Rajini of 70's and early 80's, but nowadays his inclination to make Normal characters into 'his vazhi' will go against normalization itself, no?
எதுன்னு வெளக்கமா சொல்லுங்க! தெரிஞ்சிக்கிறேன்.Quote:
Originally Posted by tamizharasan
Stale discussion. pala muRai pEsiyAchu. Rajini acting skills, Kamal's stardom w.r.t Stardom vs Utilisation of Stardom for making good movies quotient, Simran is better actor than Rajini(Only One person I know in this whole world says that)...
ungaLai ellAm BPM sitela koNdu vudaNum
Honestly I am not going to say anything that would create all sorts of troubles for me. I just defended what PR said but not specifically for common man's role but for some possible roles. Anyway I insist one thing Kamal is the only hero who does not have any apparent weaknesses in Indian cinema whether it is drama, comedy, action and dance.Quote:
Originally Posted by venkkiram
But I'll give it to NOV - Jeeva is better than Rajini was new. As Softie pointed out "only...fossible" is a much abused phraseology. But i have to use it now....
Only NOV fossible!
Even "Kamal writing..Rajini acting:" has been covered before in detail. Something New please
Jeeva/Smiran >>> Rajini.
Hub is worse than BPM site..
Completely disagree. I have NEVER seen Kamal talk high of Rajini's acting skills. eppayumE, avar padangaL vERa, vERa sensibilities etc., even condescending at times. He just sees Rajini as a star. I am not being judgemental here, just what I have observed.Quote:
Originally Posted by tamizharasan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plum
How about they both are afflicted with AIDS, so they plan to do a Bucket List, one of which is to do Sree Devi, in a threesome. Then they die peacefully.
BPM says "Apisek is better than R and K and even NT as a Star-Actor package". Can anyone beat that, git?