Printable View
"I'd like to ask him just how he has managed to work so hard to stay at the top for so long and what advice he'd give other sportsmen."
The fastest man on earth, Usain Bolt, is a fan
http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine...ry/493569.html
More other quotes here/
Sachin Tendulkar's landmark ton
The best of the lot
Sachin Tendulkar's 50th century is another major statistical highlight of an already glorious Test career
Sachin Tendulkar added yet another record to his glittering Test career when he became the first batsman to score 50 centuries. At the end of his ninth match, when he scored his first century, he averaged just under 43. Thereafter, his 10th, 20th and 30th centuries came in intervals of 46, 47 and 52 innings respectively. Injuries and a form slump meant that it took him 93 innings to progress from his 30th and 40th century. A remarkable resurgence in performance since 2008 has meant his last ten centuries have come in just 34 innings.
[html:fdcd44c123]http://lh3.ggpht.com/_TXW9tFr0Qyo/TR...MbsmnsSY/1.jpg[/html:fdcd44c123]
Tendulkar's spurt of hundreds over the last few years has improved his innings-per-century figure considerably. At one stage, he had scored 39 hundreds in 250 innings, an average of 6.41 innings per hundred. Since then, he has notched up 11 in 36 to bring his overall innings-per-century average to 5.72. Among batsmen with at least 25 hundreds, only Don Bradman has a better average.
[html:fdcd44c123]http://lh4.ggpht.com/_TXW9tFr0Qyo/TR...QrPnm5DQ/2.jpg[/html:fdcd44c123]
In the 50 innings in which he scored hundreds, Tendulkar averages 214.26, though this number has been increased by the fact that he has remained not out 16 times. Jacques Kallis and Steve Waugh are the others who have averages of more than 200, and both have also remained not out on more than ten occasions - Kallis has 13 undefeated hundreds, while Waugh has 15.
[html:fdcd44c123]http://lh5.ggpht.com/_TXW9tFr0Qyo/TR...bPg0uhL4/3.jpg[/html:fdcd44c123]
Tendulkar's hallmark has been his consistency and ability to score in all conditions. He averages over 60 in England and Sri Lanka and nearly 59 in Australia. His record isn't as good in Pakistan, where he averages just over 40 with one century. Zimbabwe remains the only country where Tendulkar has not scored a century.
[html:fdcd44c123]http://lh4.ggpht.com/_TXW9tFr0Qyo/TR...G-kyCGHo/4.jpg[/html:fdcd44c123]
Tendulkar's batting has been remarkably effective across all four innings of a match. He is the top century scorer in the first, second and third innings, and is second only in the number of centuries scored in the fourth innings. The table lists the top century getters in each match innings in Tests.
[html:fdcd44c123]http://lh5.ggpht.com/_TXW9tFr0Qyo/TR...DWQVoTIc/5.jpg[/html:fdcd44c123]
Tendulkar :clap:
50 centuries :notworthy: :thumbsup:
Many records which he has will always be his :yes:
I think if there had been more 5 test series, Tendulkar will average higher.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gideon Haigh
Because, if you see, a 5 test series gives a batsman time to readjust technique and come out of a slump
Example1: Tendullar and 241 in 2004
Example2: Ponting in the current Ashes series - sure, he has scored only 83 runs in 6 inns but see what he is going to do in the next 4 innings!
If Tendulkar had that luxury of 5 test Ashes series like Ponting, his record will be much better
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...2300&AppName=1
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...2301&AppName=1
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...1902&AppName=1
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...1900&AppName=1
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...Mode=HTML&GZ=T
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...1903&AppName=1
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...2001&AppName=1
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...2000&AppName=1
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...2002&AppName=1
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...Mode=HTML&GZ=T
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...2200&AppName=1
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Defau...2201&AppName=1
Sourav :clap:
1992:Became the first player dismissed by television replays -- itha koodavaaya Sachin record'la saerpeenga..
Frozen at 18
There was a moment during the New Zealand series when Sachin Tendulkar chased a ball in the outfield. Watching him, it struck me that nothing had changed at all with him. He was still going earnestly after the ball, with the same speed and enthusiasm that he would have displayed 20 years or more ago. When you see ageing cricketers on the field, you don't see quite the same enthusiasm and agility as they had before. You can tell a veteran in the field from a distance.
Tendulkar seems to be frozen in time. It got me thinking: what is it about this guy that he can still look an integral part of a young cricketing outfit at the age of 37 and after 21 years in international cricket? People might say that he has kept himself physically fit and kept his interest in the game alive, but I know for a fact that Tendulkar was never a fitness fanatic.
I played alongside him until 1996, during his fundamental years and he didn't spend a lot of time in the gym. In fact, the Mumbai boys always prided themselves on this: it was more the culture of cricketers from north India, particularly Delhi, to hit the gym; we just batted and fielded. The senior Mumbai players, like Sunil Gavaskar, Dilip Vengsarkar and Ravi Shastri, helped instill in us the belief that cricketers should be on the field not in the gym. Tendulkar was very much a product of that culture. I am sure he spends a little more time in the gym now than he did earlier, and watches his diet, but I'd guess that's about it.
The key to his game is his enthusiasm for it. He is like an evergreen film hero, and that is possible only because of the mind. A young mind will find ways to keep the body young. His body may be 37 years old but his mind is still 18, the time when he established himself in international cricket.
In fact that is Tendulkar's nature: he's child-like. He still gets excited by things that excited him when he was 18. Most of us change as we grow old; our ways of relaxing, our choices of reading, the movies we watch, and even the friends we keep, change. Not so with Tendulkar. He still has the same friends with whom he enjoyed spending time back then. They crack the same kinds of jokes. That same masti (enjoyment) continues. That is the real secret to Tendulkar's longevity - his heart and mind are still those of a teenage boy. And teenage boys love to play sport, don't they?
Chandrakant Pandit, the director of the Mumbai Cricket Association's academy, says that when Tendulkar comes to practise there, boyish squeals of delight can be heard. In the early years, during the last few minutes of his batting session, Tendulkar would challenge the net bowlers: last four balls, 15 to win. Pandit tells me Tendulkar does that even today. He also still argues with the net bowlers about whether his shot was a four and whether he was dismissed or not. Most ageing batsmen I know tend to have almost sombre net sessions and leave. Not Tendulkar, it seems, from what we hear.
Everyone knows Tendulkar is a very private person. He opens up only around his close friends, in a secure environment. Once he steps out into the public domain, even if there are only a couple of people around, he is aware of them and is immediately on red alert. When he is out on the cricket field, in the public domain, be it a Ranji game or an exhibition match, he is aware he's being watched. And once that is the case, he wants to come out looking nothing but the best. That's innate to his nature and has been right through his career. I have never seen him go out and play silly or casual cricket, whatever the game. You cannot say the same about too many other great cricketers.
"I don't like getting out," he said somewhere after the 50th Test hundred. That's true with him for all cricket, all the time. He will bat with the same intent against Bangladesh on a flat track as he would against Australia in Brisbane. Or for that matter against Tamil Nadu in the odd Ranji game for Mumbai as in a benefit match for an ex-cricketer. Once Tendulkar is in the public view, he is not willing to look any less than what he is: a great performer and a competitor.
His sprinting after the ball on the field comes from the same mindset. People are watching. It may not be the most significant moment of the day but people are watching me. I cannot be seen not excelling. And that is the attitude when it comes to his fielding, bowling, and of course his batting.
I think these are the two fundamental reasons - the child-like enthusiasm and a fierce desire to look his best every time he is on stage - why he is able to have had the kind of run he has had. That he is still able to bring the same value and more to this Indian Test team that he did as an 18-year-old is truly remarkable, apart from being rare.
There is another factor that I would like to explain with the example of Imran Khan. As he grew older, Imran changed from being a fast-bowling allrounder to a leader of Pakistan cricket. Cricket to him had become more than just batting and bowling. Because he was educated at Oxford, and studied political science, politics held great interest for him. Towards the end of his career, the cancer hospital became his obsession. And now it is about trying to effect a social change in Pakistan.
Even after 21 years of cricket at the highest level, nothing appeals to Tendulkar more than cricket. Also, by remaining a pure batting performer, rather than being a long-term captain or a leader of thoughts in Indian cricket, he has been able to devote all his energies, skills and focus to one thing and one thing only - getting runs.
Getting those fifties and hundreds. That is his single-minded obsession, and has been for the last 25 years, since the time he started off playing official cricket at 12 for his school, Shardashram Vidyamandir.
Getting runs gives him the greatest joy. The other stuff - the fast cars, new electronic gadgets, good food and friends are passions, but the obsession is just one: batting and getting those centuries for India.
_____________________________
Good article :clap: :clap: Sanju Manju washes his sins of "white elephant" article with this one.
yellem, Sanjrekar has put banana needle:
adhAvadhu Indhiya veRRIkku pAdu padAma, tahnnOda centuryE kuRiyA iruppArAm.Quote:
just one: batting and getting those centuries for India.
idhu puriyAma nIngaLum...
plum,
centuries for india'nu dhane solraar...