Ramanuja is not accepted because he is a thamizh. And aryabhata is not criticized,because he is a non-tamil either. 8-)
I dont really understand what do you trying to imply here! :?
Printable View
Ramanuja is not accepted because he is a thamizh. And aryabhata is not criticized,because he is a non-tamil either. 8-)
I dont really understand what do you trying to imply here! :?
I think u missed my point. May be i was not clear. I had asked u will you accept if there are no tamil mathematicians. I knew there was Ramanujan or if u go beyond there was Padmanabhan Ramanujam,CVRaman or Chandrasekhar Subramanian and So on and so forth. But the thing was if you are ready to accept them then why not the other Vedic scholars?.
Now i dont want the reply from you that u accept vedic scholars because this was not evident from you or ur friends in this entire thread.
Wrong question! Better ask when did SRS not lie?Quote:
Originally Posted by indian224080
Idiotic Indian nummeral it is not at all so that A-F is representing numbers. In this case A-F are numbers. They could have also used idly, thosai, idiappam, puttu and rotty instead!
Because our counting system is decimal system and computing is using hexadecimal they need to use some characters for the numbers 10 to 15 ( base 10). Because 10 to 15 have too digits they could be easily mixed up with 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 in Hexadezimal system (would be 16,17, 18, 19, 21 in decimalsystem).
ABCD in hexadecimal system means A*16*16*16 + B*16*16 + C*16 + D*1 = 10*4096 + 11*256 + 12*16 + 13*1 = 40960 + 2816 + 192 + 13 = 43981 in decimal system.
I think you are missing the point here Indian. Ramanujam's work is undisputed and his theorems are unambiguous. That unfortunately is not the case with the verses posted in this thread. All the copy and paste material are open to different interpretations, which is not mathematics.Quote:
Originally Posted by indian224080
Idiotic SRS,
can you please write more on BNF? It seems you don't have a single idea about it. This BNF or EBNF is one of the first things you learn in computings along with dual (binary), octal, decimal and hexa decimal systems. So keep the ball flat if you want to play a good football match.
Can anyone tell me something or anything at all about Subramaniyan Chandrashekar? Was/is he a Tamil?
Well Said Kannan.
Be it Sanskrit or Mathematics both can be understood by people in their own field. People here creating foul and raising cry over the verses is similar to Simpson crying foul over Mathematics theorems. I am glad you vouch for Ramanujans theorems, and so in similar fashion Hindu Geometry scholars attest and vouch for Shulba sutras which is exactly reproduced.
Well, CV Raman and Chandrashekhar published their work in Nature and PRL and their work was reviewed by experts and accepted for publication after careful analysis.Quote:
Originally Posted by indian224080
Journasl in which your Vedic Scholars published their work????:?:
Exactly what kind of background you have Indian????
:idea:Quote:
Originally Posted by stranger
He was using letters instead of numbers. Superb!
But which letter is defined for which number? :roll:
If only hindu geometric scholars attest for the verses here, then what is the point of this discussion. Mathematics is about universal approval. Can someone start his learning of mathematics with the 'sutras' and understand the intricacies of the subject with only that? No way. And I wonder what other 'treasures' are buried in the vedic text, that the ignorant billions spending mathematics researchers are not aware of!! Can anyone post them here. That could be a breakthrough!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by indian224080