Printable View
You should have been given an academy award for repeating opinions which were rejected all over the shop!!
Keep it up Devapriya!!
Sanskrit is dated to 4c ACE. Nothing came from Sanskrit.
Sanskrit was made up from elements of many languages. Invented for prayers. I am not saying that the language is not good. You may do your prayers in Sanskrit if you like.
Dear Bismala,
You attack unnecessarily, Can you quote or link which University tells your lies.
What then is your dating for Rig Veda and Tholkappiyam and please link with Acceptable Authorities.
It is an ongoing dialogue between some old hubbers in this forum. You have not read all the posts obviously. Please do not come in between at the tal end and jump to your own conclusions as to whether any reply is an attack or not and whether it is necessary or not. Mine is a necessary comment.Quote:
You attack unnecessarily
As to the linguistic query you raised, please read all the old posts in this thread and all connected threads. I do not intend to repeat evidence so far brought up and explained..
Thank you.
The trick of accusing a poster or writer in any forum of lying and getting her to spring into action to produce more references and links for you... it is a way of getting someone to be your workhorse!! One may want more references or data for some specific purpose or because of some general interest in the subject under discussion. For all I know, this person may be herself doing a thesis or writing a book. Then accusing someone who has been writing on the topic of telling lies is a good trick. You can expect this person to go on her bended knees and beg to be cleared of the accusation of lying... by producing materials, which you can use in your own book or thesis....
I have already come across two books in which some of the materials discussed in forums have been made use of. I have also been informed that programmes in broadcasting stations have made use of such materials. We are aware of what is going on.......!!
If you think what we are saying is not correct, YOU PRODUCE YOUR REFERENCES AND PUBLISH YOUR RESEARCH FOR US TO EXAMINE.
iF YOU HAVE NONE TO PRODUCE, then you are not entitled to get your materials from us by levelling an accusation against us.
:shock: Mala, that's news to me. If that has indeed happened, it is severe academic plagiarism (if they haven't acknowledged the source). Can you name the books here?Quote:
Originally Posted by bis_mala
Lawyers have advised me not to give the names of these books until they come to a conclusion Kannan.
I can give you a bunch of book names. The one I am currently working through is called "Plagiarism - The Principles of Vedic Philosophy"
Mala,
I should send you a soft copy of this great book and you can comment and quote from there.
Please do. Thanks in advance.
Do not talk gibberish and converge your route through atrocity.
Samskrith was not made up like dravidian languages, it is the language of the gods(dEvaBASA) and has no specific period of existence as against tamil which is not more than 3000 years old and that is not just my view but view of all the learned ones.
And as far as praying is concerned, Samskrith is still using the same gods right from its existence unlike tamil which changed the name of its gods(ofcourse after Samskrith names) from whatever to whatever. Lastly even Kannada has more antiquity in this regard as Maathus existed before thevarams and prabandhams(one more point here- prabandham itself is a Samskrith word as against knowledge of some peanut brains).
And where are these gods from? Were the gods bored that much that the invented the dEvapAsai? I only wonder why they did not invented the telephone!Quote:
Originally Posted by shoyonika