hmm... I remember Brangan pointing this out in one of his latest articles. He was praising Sivaji for remaining as a protagonist in these family entertainers.Quote:
Conclusion: nalla kudumba pada paarththa thirupththi
Here it is
Between Reviews: Sex and violence, for the whole family
APR 27, 2008 - AS TWO RECENT RELEASES OFFER AMPLE PROOF, there are some things in Tamil cinema that will never change - the fact, for instance, that the hero isn’t a hero until he flexes his muscles. Santhosh Subramaniam and Yaaradi Nee Mohini are both what are known as “family” films, and that genre (if it can be called that) has come a long way from what families used to watch in the black-and-white era - the melodramas of P Bhimsingh, say. I can’t recall a single one of those films where Sivaji Ganesan - who moped and monologued his way through a goodish number of them - raised a hand. He’d raise his voice, yes, that lion’s roar that defined declamatory acting for an entire generation - but if he raised a hand, it was, at best, to direct a slap at a scheming co-star’s cheek (or, perhaps, a series of why-God-why blows at his own forehead), and never to have a go at a henchman’s solar plexus. But then Sivaji Ganesan, and others like him, were merely the protagonists of those films, while today, the likes of Jayam Ravi (in Santhosh Subramaniam) and Dhanush (in Yaaradi Nee Mohini) are heroes. And where there is a hero, there is, by definition, a villain, and where there is a villain, there is an angry confrontation, and where is angry confrontation, there is a fight sequence