Printable View
Dear Idiappam,
Ignore this frustrated and helpless "zoossanoooo" (C.J.SRS), he has no idea about the absolute validity of my proofs. My work has drawn incredible attention among intellectuals and thinkers. Regarding publishing my work, there is no problem and I am right on track, slowly but steadily, there is no hurry at all.
The worried people have to just hold their breath and wait. :poke:
Thanks for the compliments. :)
SRS, you are right in saying that most a hindus here. And hinduism is not a single religion - based on the fact that it has Advaita, Dwaita etc, contrasting and contradicting concepts. So what is the point of preaching Advaita here. Rohit not only raised some questions, but punctured some concepts of Advaita, etc.
That was interesting!
Pradheep, method is not suitable. He is never straight to the point, his stories could bore even a new born, - the 'no smoke without fire' type.
Rohit's posts are clear and focused. Pradheep's - never. Before he makes a conclusion on any issue - he will beat-around-the-bushes - going off track, sometimes -- hoping to confuse the openents. Rohit, pulls him back on track - I have seen that many times on this thread..
Anyway let this unique thread stay. It is a masterpiece -- NOT the "I" Vedanta thing (I don't care a penny for that), but the manner which the opponents fought (even the personal attacks were decent). Well done!
Yet another three perfectly normalised reactions, in a "zoossanoooo" way, exactly as expected. :thumbsup:
2N+166 :notworthy:
Yes, it's a hopping one and already in momentum. :thumbsup: :lol: :)
The philosophy of Advaita is only difficult for those who are incapable of spotting and understanding the utter flaws in the entire philosophy of Advaita Vedanta; simply because the Advaita is a thoughtless and heedless construction of countless contradictions and inconsistencies. The Advaita being founded on the Buddhist philosophical sophistication of Nirvana - a Buddhism in disguise - and as Brahman of Advaita and Nirvana of Buddhism are mutually exclusive to each other; the inherent inability of Advaitin to spot the mutually exclusiveness, renders the Advaita completely self-defeating, proving Brahman nothing but a non-entity when placed under the critical philosophical scrutiny.
Not even a single time, no one has ever succeeded in refuting my arguments so far; neither in the new hub nor in the old hub, just a few arguments and implications shatter the whole Advaita. Otherwise Pradheep and his crewmembers wouldn’t be so disoriented, flabbergasted and frustrated here as they are.
What is very few???Quote:
Originally Posted by SRS
And how many understands your "loads and loads of crap"???
When did you do an opinion poll???
How did you know that if u did not do that???
You and few more clowns are the only few who is living in your "maya world". You better understand that before it is getting too late! :twisted:
So you speak for all the Hindus???Quote:
Pradheep, on the other hand, is explaining Advaita. As most here are Hindus, such explanations serve a practical purpose, especially since Advaita is difficult to comprehend on a conceptual level.
I am a Hindu too. I think you and Pradheep are pouring worthless trashes. Pouring filth in the name of Hinduism. :twisted:
On the other hand, Rohit, another sensible hindu, trying to bring the world a better place to live. Save the world from fanatics and senseless idiots.
Dont you ever speak for any Hindu besides yourself if at all u r a Hindu. :twisted:
Nobody is representing you or Pradheep besides Surya. you better know that. :twisted: :twisted:
Thank you stranger for your appreciation and compliments. I feel greatly honoured. Thank you! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by stranger
Now you are beyond senility! If your work has indeed been published , and you can prove it, I will be the first one to apologize to you. Of course this is not the case. On a prior occassion when I mentioned this, you said Forumhub is a testing ground. Now let me count the number of scientists/mathematicians who use Forumhub as a testing ground. :wink: Anyone can have theories, fine! But passing off the theory as accepted scientific fact is decietful, as per your desperate attempt to distort the Hawkins/Hartle hypothesis.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohit
I am not vouching for the thread on the basis of Advaita. It is one thing to have a debate; however, Rohit has made his point clear: Brahman is an illusory concept and any God-believer is suffering from delusions. This is atheism, not Hinduism. You will notice with Rohit, he does not even leave open the possibility of a Creator God. Even *modern* science leaves open that possibility. Furthermore, I have seen Rohit making these same arguments for several yrs now, with different people. All of these people were convinced Rohit's theory was flawed, but Rohit never admitted that. Basically, Rohit is drawing circles. That is not debating, that is sterilized dogmatism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Idiappam
Yet two more perfectly normalised reactions, in a "zoossanoooo" way, exactly as expected. :thumbsup:
2N+168 :notworthy:
Yes, it's hopping and spinning, marking its own circles while in motion. :thumbsup: :lol: :)