Super Star in & as LINGAA ♠Anushka ♠ARR ♠KS Ravikumar

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vithagan

That fool distributor said Endhiran Lifetime collection is $7 crores, then what made him to buy at this price?? just for 10% returns??, banks giving that interest rate if not 10% close to that but he want the profit within a week then you won't call that as greedy but poor distributor.. haan??
Agreed Vendhar movies is greedy else they would not bought from EROS more than the face value.. somewhere I read even they had 15C loss but they take the loss as risk in investment.. Greedy ratio is reverse from what you said.. Local Dist > Vendhar > Eros

Yaarukku inga risk adhigamoe avanga dhaan greedy.. simple.

---

Greedy:
Local Dist < Vendhar < Eros < Producers..

yaarukku risk adhigamo avunga thaan greedy'a? what a statement?
munnerathukaaga risk edukuravan athana perum greedya?..
risk eduthu nilatha adamaanam vachi education loana pottu padikuravan greedya?
risk eduthu nilatha vithu business panravan greedya?

Kastapadranu nagaiya adagu vaika pora edathula,vattikku kaasu vaanga pora edathula kasta padraanga namma kaasu kodutha thaan ivanukku lifenu situationa use panni adhiga vattiku kaasu kodukuravan greedya?
sollunga sir..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saai

You should tell as you quoted my posts and replied to it. How would I know your intentions behind quoting my posts?

---

I don't have any "intentions" but only posting what is the fact...you need to know what one says read it grasp it rather than saying on top of Mt.Kilimanjaro that the distributors/theatre owners should be compensated because of their foolishness etc etc

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dilbert

go back and read your unjumbled post again!! and what you said about Thalaivar's salary. For one movie , which he acted after 4 years people are shitting in their pants :lol: about what will happen their futures if he continues ...My god..

---

So you mean Rajni doesn't have any hand on profit shares. He only gets paycheck and Rockline venkatesh has the complete share as the producer. Rajni is the most powerful figure in TN cinema. When he brings in a producer on his own, and you think he doesn't get the share of profits :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saai

Why only me? Isn't the case with everyone? Including genius like you :)



Check my reply to vithagan. It has the reply to your post too

---

thanks..let me be humble enough to say that I am not genius but I would like to learn a lot to be like one...

still you didn't answer clearly...you are vague...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leosimha

I don't have any "intentions" but only posting what is the fact...you need to know what one says read it grasp it rather than saying on top of Mt.Kilimanjaro that the distributors/theatre owners should be compensated because of their foolishness etc etc

---

when did I say that! Show one post! Just one post...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saai

ada raamaa!

This line will suit only if the risk-taker is proportionately rewarded for his risk. In any usual business models, the higher the risk , higher the profits. In this case, the producers have shifted the risks to distributors and doesn't proportionately reward them. Thats why they are greedy..

---

Why the distributors agreed to this model then?? If the same model happened for Vishal movie(just an example) would the distributor agreed to the model and put lumpsum amount?? he wouldn't do that.. just because its Rajini he hoped that he would recover the cost within short time but that didn't happened..Thats why I'm saying he is greeedy..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leosimha

still you didn't answer clearly...you are vague...

---

What is vague here?

In any usual business models, the higher the risk , higher the profits (directly proportinate). In this case, the producers have shifted the risks to distributors and doesn't proportionately reward them. Thats why they are greedy.."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leosimha

first you give me the proofs of chickening...

then I will give you lessons in Psychology so that you can understand the events Psychologically... :)

---

Chicken. Don't just blabber just like that, especially when you will play jumble words when asked to stand by it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vithagan

Why the distributors agreed to this model then?? If the same model happened for Vishal movie(just an example) would the distributor agreed to the model and put lumpsum amount?? he wouldn't do that.. just because its Rajini he hoped that he would recover the cost within short time but that didn't happened..Thats why I'm saying he is greeedy..

---

How would that be greedy, because anyway their profit share is meagre. The producer is going to take 90% of the remaining profits too. Its because they just blindly believe the "brand" rajni,which din't work this time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saai

ada raamaa!

This line will suit only if the risk-taker is proportionately rewarded for his risk. In any usual business models, the higher the risk , higher the profits. In this case, the producers have shifted the risks to distributors and doesn't proportionately reward them. Thats why they are greedy..

---

I have been reading past few pages of the discussion and seen people make sweeping statement.
Since i do not know the nit-ty-gritty of contractual agreements, it is unfair/stupid to make generalized conclusion. it looks to me the pay off will be asymmetrical since the local distributor takes only 10% of profit as he claims then we got assume he takes less risk...If he still takes 100% risk and 10% profit, then the hidden agenda in the contractual agreement is completely different than making profit. As many distributors / theatre owners thinks releasing rajinkanth movie is one of the proven/time tested path to establish themselves in the industry. So might had a long term strategic plan to be in the industry....