Printable View
Shoyonika,Quote:
Originally Posted by shoyonika
This is the crux of their argument. Baseless argument which is seated in their brains as professed by their Politicians....
They will demean you,your name and the state from which u come from and then say that Their language is the goddess from which all languages came. Carry on with ur good work.
"Laton kein Booth Baathon se nahi mantein"
Best wishes from my side
regards
Indian224080
I guess the moderaotor is not seeing this thread anymore! What is going on here! Directly against the rules
Dear Shayanika(Shoyonika-the Bengali accemt of Shayanika)! Please come out of htese kind of thread! Wise people will not participate in such foolish Tharkas!
Have you ever seen Samskrith scholars, fighting for the supremacy of Samskritham. The have never, for they know, it is useless sepnding valuable time in proving 1+1 = 2.
Instead, if you go deep in to Samskritham and develop you knowldege, it will help you in every way!
Hi Srivatsanvr awesome words buddy
And you participate so what does that mean ?Quote:
Please come out of htese kind of thread! Wise people will not participate in such foolish Tharkas!
Thanks for declaring that those sanskrit fans that participate here by claiming sanskrit supremacy are not scholars.Quote:
Have you ever seen Samskrith scholars, fighting for the supremacy of Samskritham
Absolutely true drink soma and dancing aroung a bon fire is for more happier thing to do !Quote:
Instead, if you go deep in to Samskritham and develop you knowldege, it will help you in every way!
How about crow poaching with lungis mahadevan?
:rotfl:Quote:
Originally Posted by srivatsanvr
What do you think you are doing here?! :lol:
These kinds of tricks wont work anymore! :lol:
Upanishad means the inner or mystic teaching. The term Upanishad is derived from upa (near), ni (down) and s(h)ad (to sit), i.e., sitting down near. Groups of pupils sit near the teacher to learn from him the secret doctrine. In the quietude of the forest hermitages the Upanishad thinkers pondered on the problems of deepest concerns and communicated their knowledge to fit pupils near them. Samkara derives the word Upanishad as a substitute from the root sad, 'to loosen.,' 'to reach' or 'to destroy' with Upa and ni as prefixes and kvip as termination. If this determination is accepted, upanishad means brahma-knowledge by which ignorance is loosened or destroyed. The treatises that deal with brahma-knowledge are called the Upanishads and so pass for the Vedanta. The different derivations together make out that the Upanishads give us both spiritual vision and philosophical argument. There is a core of certainty which is essentially incommunicable except by a way of life. It is by a strictly personal effort that one can reach the truth.
The Upanishads more clearly set forth the prime Vedic doctrines like Self-realization, yoga and meditation, karma and reincarnation, which were hidden or kept veiled under the symbols of the older mystery religion. The older Upanishads are usually affixed to a particularly Veda, through a Brahmana or Aranyaka. The more recent ones are not. The Upanishads became prevalent some centuries before the time of Krishna and Buddha.
The main figure in the Upanishads, though not present in many of them, is the sage Yajnavalkya. Most of the great teachings of later Hindu and Buddhist philosophy derive from him. He taught the great doctrine of "neti-neti", the view that truth can be found only through the negation of all thoughts about it. Other important Upanishadic sages are Uddalaka Aruni, Shwetaketu, Shandilya, Aitareya, Pippalada, Sanat Kumara. Many earlier Vedic teachers like Manu, Brihaspati, Ayasya and Narada are also found in the Upanishads.
In the Upanishads the spiritual meanings of the Vedic texts are brought out and emphasized in their own right.
This is all a waste until you wont recognize what is right and what is wrong, because some people laugh without any meaning and such people who laugh without any reason to, are nothing but mads and that too not ordinary but very cunningly mad because they just turn the meaning of a word into a meaningless word according to their stunted brains.
Thank you for the kindness and support. You are right, it is senseless to explain truth as it is very difficult to understand especially to peanut brains. Moreover scholars never needed to uphold the supremacy of Samskrith as it was never low at all. Thanks for the support, it is always welcome.
Samskrith is suitable for Scholarly people and many tamilians also were for Samskrith, but wonder why these people are acting in such a weird fashion?
Yeah, Is that why vacuum head like you come and bs something SO IRRELEVANT to the thread which was intended for discussing, The elderliness of thamizh!????Quote:
Originally Posted by shoyonika
Why has so called elderliness of thamizh is to be proved by bashing another classical language? You mean to say u have no other ways to prove the elderliness of a language? Or may be is it this way that Vaccuum heads like you know to prove?Quote:
Originally Posted by stranger
You can go on start a thread for the classical language and BS, I would say?! :twisted:
You are driving in the left side in America, tiny-brain! :twisted:
Should I have to spell out everything to you????? :twisted: