From this truth unrevealed MSV > IR certainly.
Printable View
From this truth unrevealed MSV > IR certainly.
nalla irukkunga unga neutral biasuQuote:
Originally Posted by Scale
Stomp be biased, no problem. I am moving to the next. No further responses on this topic.
Scale, a kind request before you move on - irukkara vaarthaigala use pannunga, please
Reg BGM: Oh, Scale, 80s ku munnadi BGM irundhucha? Sathiyama enga yaarukkume theriyaadhunga. Thanks for unearthing this ariya unmai
Sanjeevi,Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanjeevi
:notthatway: idhellam avar "lift" nu solra eraalamaana post-gal range la eduthukkanum (vitranum)
Though, personally, I'm so not into the question of bias (I come from the school of thought that asks, "why bother?"), let me put the central question that comes up in my mind in this sort of a scenario. The notion of bias means one expects some sort of objectivity from the opiner, not to be confused with the notion that there's one universal truth about the topic that's being discussed. (To be more precise, not that there's a single way to access art, but that the opiner has to be sincere in accessing it the way he or she chooses to.)
So here's the question: What's the scope for anyone to express their opinion (say, that Raaja is the best!) without it being identified as a biased one? Falsifiability, that's the key.
I'd argue that it is precisely this fear (of being called biased) that makes many people strongly insist that MSV, Raaja and Rahman are all, indeed, equally great. Which is merely another opinion, but never identified thus.
Very well said, equa. But inge MSV=IR=ARR nu solradhu is the SCALE for objectivity pOla.Quote:
Originally Posted by equanimus
Ninaikkumbodhae sirippai adakka mudiyala :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by AudazJay
enga ponaalum indha meesic sandaiya viduratha illai. Cycle gap kidaichcha lorrya vittuduraangappa.