but a normal person with religious inclination towards a particular god will think it was a divine intervention enacted via Balram Naidu, and KH the writer doesnt refute that openly as what he does with Hindu beliefs. In fact, the writer KH overtly supports that by making nagesh mouth that particular dialogue to kalifullah.Quote:
Originally Posted by sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar
earlier on the same night (Christmas!) Poovaragan hands over his gold chain with a cross to P Vasu's son, who is shown to be celebrating his birthday. the next morning, during tsunami, the boy is saved (since he is wearing the cross) but Poovaragan dies in the process of saving the child (since he is NOT wearing the cross)[ analogous to Karnan's kavacha-kundalam and Samson's uncut hair]. so the message conveyed is that the person wearing the cross is saved.
so KH is offering fringe benefits to non hindus by extending his covert (often overt) support, in the name of atheism :lol: