MAKKAL THILAGAM MGR !!!

Hi,

How do you define romance? Tamizharasan said Kamal is the best romantic hero. Kamal was a handsome hero, for eg. in vazhve maayam, he looked great as a romantic hero. But not any more. Now, he mixes romance/love with something else. West may accept his concept, but not TN.
IMO, for romance, your eyes should talk with a girl, talk softly, almost seduce her. Gemini was the best here, he could love a girl without touching her. Eg. Then nilavu/Kalyana Parisu. If you watch Sivaji's V.Maaligai/Ooty V uravu/Puthiya paravai, you will see his love scene performance definitely exceeds Kamal's. The issue is Kamal's tamil pronunciation, it sounds somewhat artificial (in love scenes) when compared to gemini/sivaji. Just to illustrate more, watch a scene in VMaaligai, when sivaji takes Vanisree to his Palace and goes for a lengthy dialogue...though it may not happen in real life, but it was a great scene to watch!!

Thirumaran talked about history movies and said Kamal's Marudanayagam will show case his talent. Let Marudanayagam come first and i wish a big success for Kamalji. Even then, I bet Kamal or anyone cannot beat VPKattabomman. Over 40 years have been passed since Kattabomman release, no tamil actor has beaten his performance. So, it won't happen for another 40-50 years.

Sivaji had limitations too: action movies. MGR was good in editing, direction. Kamal is a total package, he does everything. Kamal is one of the best we got now!!

tacinema,

Kamal is one of the best we got now??

When it comes to total package, Kamal is THE BEST we've got now! :D

MGR acts for his fans and for soceiety, like
En Annan, Nam Naadu, Nadodi Manan
Shivaji acts for himself, and his fans, hes a bit worldclass
Theivamaghan, VP KB, etc

Shivaji tried some mass flicks, doenst do well like Patkati Bhairavan

Thamizharasan , Excellent post ! I agree with every word of urs !
I sincerely feel like laughing when someone says Shivaji beat Kamal in romantic roles :lol: ..............

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vasanth_luv

Thamizharasan , Excellent post ! I agree with every word of urs !
I sincerely feel like laughing when someone says Shivaji beat Kamal in romantic roles :lol: ..............

---

:banghead:

Quote:

---

In my opinion no one did action better than Super Star. The main reason he is easily faster than any one else. He lits up the screen with fast movements. All his movies are very fast paced and at present point of time he is the most successful actor in India. He is far more successful than even Amitabh bachchan man. Amitabh movies reach almost all states in India where as rajini movies reach only few states but rajini gets paid four times of what amitabh bachchan gets. This itself an example of how successful.

---

Tamil,
Ellam correct-a sollittu vandheenga. ana kadaisila sodhappi vittenghala....

What do you mean Action?

kaiyala car-i stop panradhu..
parandhu parandhu fight panradhu...

idhu dhan action-a...?

Action means Actors should show their Individual power.

for example.
MGR's all kathi and silambam fights.
kamal's some action movies like Vetrivizha(Beach fight),MMKR(Toilet fight),Mahanadhi(Jail fight),kuruthi punal,Alavandhan(climax fight) and somany...

adhu dhan action...

Quote:

---

I have noted one strange thing guys who were fans of MGR became fans of Kamal

---

[b]Because both of them are multi talented and Unique person in Tamil film industry.

rachel,

Edhume post panna maatiyappa..

onnu sirikkire.... illatti muttikire...

oomaya..?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RajaRam

rachel,

Edhume post panna maatiyappa..

onnu sirikkire.... illatti muttikire...

oomaya..?

---

:oops:

//I have noted one strange thing guys who were fans of MGR became fans of Kamal //

This is nothing strange..Most of my friends who are sivaji fans are Rajini fans .And Many of my friends who are MGR fans are mostly Kamal Fans..(I am exception)

I think,basically it is because they don't like somebody with a same pettern of their favourite and they don't want somebody to be compared with their favourite or filling the place.

So Many sivaji fans became rajini fans and MGR fans became Kamal fans.

(But mostly this applies to only educated fans)

Quote:

---

I think,basically it is because they don't like somebody with a same pettern of their favourite and they don't want somebody to be compared with their favourite or filling the place.

---

I don't know whether it is correct or not. But I am different.

Reasons.

1.Both are multi talented.(I became fan of MGR after seeing NM,AP and USV and I became fan of KAMAL after seeing NI,GURU,SO,SKV.)

2.Both are interested to maintain the body(I am also).

3.Both are handsome.

4.Both are kind hearted.(MGR spent all his earned money to others.KAMAL is spending all his earned money in cinema only).

Vadivelu anna...ungalukku body maintain panrathula romba intrestaa :rotfl: :clap:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rachel

:banghead:

---

Rachel, henceforth, care to explain what were u trying to convey by using some words too !

Quote:

---

kamal's some action movies like Vetrivizha(Beach fight),MMKR(Toilet fight),Mahanadhi(Jail fight),kuruthi punal,Alavandhan(climax fight) and somany...

---

can anyone educate annE that action is not confined to *fights* :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kasi_sce

Quote:

---

kamal's some action movies like Vetrivizha(Beach fight),MMKR(Toilet fight),Mahanadhi(Jail fight),kuruthi punal,Alavandhan(climax fight) and somany...

---

can anyone educate annE that action is not confined to *fights* :lol:

---

but fight is the main aspect of action!..right?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RajaRam

rachel,

Edhume post panna maatiyappa..

onnu sirikkire.... illatti muttikire...

oomaya..?

---

avangalukku kannu theriyadhu :lol: :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kasi_sce

Quote:

---

kamal's some action movies like Vetrivizha(Beach fight),MMKR(Toilet fight),Mahanadhi(Jail fight),kuruthi punal,Alavandhan(climax fight) and somany...

---

can anyone educate annE that action is not confined to *fights* :lol:

---

but fight is the main aspect of action!..right?

---

Not necessary!!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joe

Thirumaran,
Everybody knows that MGR is better in action compare to Nadigar thilagam ..But my point is Nadigar Thilagam has tried MGR type action movies and succeed most of them ,if not all .whereas Makkal Thilagam tried few Sivaji type movies and miserably failed..that is the difference..hope you understand

//I did not say anything like Shivaji is Zero in acting, Shivaji is pathetic in acting like that//

Don't be too smart and sarcastic .If you have said so,no body would have argued with you and treat you as a .......

---

So if shivaji succeeded in some action roles means that he is on par with MGR in action? If MGR succeeded in charater roles you would have said MGR is on Par with Shivaji in character roles? Is that what you are arguing?

People said i was bashing shivaji. Can you point out some of my words which you feels like bashing? But some people mentioned the words like zero in acting, pathetic, etc.. for MGR which is what is called bashing? That is what i said.

Is that now everybody treating them as a ..... ? as per your words.

But you people are praising them for their bashing like this.

I am not acting too smart. It is what some of you trying to be smart?

:(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RajaRam

Quote:

---

I think,basically it is because they don't like somebody with a same pettern of their favourite and they don't want somebody to be compared with their favourite or filling the place.

---

I don't know whether it is correct or not. But I am different.

Reasons.

1.Both are multi talented.(I became fan of MGR after seeing NM,AP and USV and I became fan of KAMAL after seeing NI,GURU,SO,SKV.)

2.Both are interested to maintain the body(I am also).

3.Both are handsome.

4.Both are kind hearted.(MGR spent all his earned money to others.KAMAL is spending all his earned money in cinema only).

---

Same here. Other than that i feel
1) both of them are disciplined.
2) Both were intersted in the uplifting of the society.

Some of Kamal's talents and Achivements

1. A great actor who excelled in all the roles he played. Almost 95 percent of movies had natural performances. We can list several
movies to show his versatility in acting department alone.
2. Since He is great in Dance(any kind of dance. Even if he dont know some he can learn within few weeks) he can do roles related to dance talents.
3. Great in action sequences. Knows many of the categories of fights also(Karate, Silambam,etc)
4. Acted in many languages and have given silver jubilee hits in 5 languages. No other actor can dream about this.
5. Only Tamil/ South indian actor who is most known and well respected among non tamilians including north indians also.
6. Got Lots of state/ national / international acclaims which no actor can dream of. Dont come and say that everything he got
with political influene. He is nothing to do with politics.
7. Great Technician.
8. Good Singer (once he came closer to getting national award). Once Yesudass said in an interview that many people called him
and wished him for the song "Sundari neeyum, Sundaran naanu" actually sung by kamal.
9. Good story and screenplay writer. Got recognition for those.
10. Good Dialogue writer too. Got recognition for this too.
11. Great in Direction department. Though he directed only 3 movies. Got recognition for this too.
12. He can fit into many kind of characters than any other actor in India.
13. And lot more.

If we take Versatility in all the aspects of cine industry then he is the king. No one can come near him.
Dont you think that Kamal has reached more heights than shivaji.
Other than that he still has more years in cine industry. So more achivements and more talents will be shown.

Water from many sources forms an ocean. Lots of talents in many departments forms Kamal.
So he is the Ocean.

Finally in a single word. Kamal is the most talented cine personality India had ever produced. Even in the
future no one can come near his talents.

Thanks all for accepting this and stopping the argument.

Friend Joe
thanks for your compliment. You know what I meant by he did not look like karnan. I meant he did not look like a warrior. Believe me if he had maintained the physique and had acted under right director he would have got the fame that no one had ever achieved in the world cinema.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joe

tamizharasan,
Good post.

but
// he did not look like Karnan at all in that movie.//

Looks like you have Karnan's photo..he he

---

Kasi
very well said. I talked about the Rajini's screen presence. Very good example is Baasha. No one in India would have done that role better than Rajini. His fast movements in that movie is a treat to watch. Most of the kamal fans will also accept that I believe.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kasi_sce

Quote:

---

kamal's some action movies like Vetrivizha(Beach fight),MMKR(Toilet fight),Mahanadhi(Jail fight),kuruthi punal,Alavandhan(climax fight) and somany...

---

can anyone educate annE that action is not confined to *fights* :lol:

---

Hey tacinema,

Quote:

---

How do you define romance? Tamizharasan said Kamal is the best romantic hero. Kamal was a handsome hero, for eg. in vazhve maayam, he looked great as a romantic hero. But not any more. Now, he mixes romance/love with something else. West may accept his concept, but not TN.

---

So you want kamal to do more romantic roles at the age of 50. Did shivaji excelled in romantic roles at the later ages. I remember shivaji doing romance with Sridevi in some movie which looks pathetic. But even at this age if Kamal do some romance it wont be pathetic.
By the way I was not refering to kissing alone when we talk of romance.

Quote:

---

IMO, for romance, your eyes should talk with a girl, talk softly, almost seduce her. Gemini was the best here, he could love a girl without touching her. Eg. Then nilavu/Kalyana Parisu. If you watch Sivaji's V.Maaligai/Ooty V uravu/Puthiya paravai, you will see his love scene performance definitely exceeds Kamal's. The issue is Kamal's tamil pronunciation, it sounds somewhat artificial (in love scenes) when compared to gemini/sivaji.

---

I also can give some definitions on romance. So what? Have you not seen 'Ek dujhe ke liye' or 'Telugu version' of that.
Is that not good enough to say Kamal is great in romance. Of course the phenomenal box office success of those movies can say that. Tamil dialogues of Kamal looks artificial in romance scenes.
:lol: Very sad that he did some great romance movie in different language but could not do well in his mother tongue.

Quote:

---

Just to illustrate more, watch a scene in VMaaligai, when sivaji takes Vanisree to his Palace and goes for a lengthy dialogue...though it may not happen in real life, but it was a great scene to watch!!

---

Cool. Yes. You accepted one thing. The lengthy dialogues which shivaji talks in allmost all his movies will never happen in real life. That is why we say shivaji over does many of his character including the one you mentioned. That is why one of the reasons he could not get any national award for best actor in his period.

Quote:

---

Sivaji had limitations too: action movies. MGR was good in editing, direction. Kamal is a total package, he does everything. Kamal is one of the best we got now!!

---

Quote:

---

Thirumaran talked about history movies and said Kamal's Marudanayagam will show case his talent. Let Marudanayagam come first and i wish a big success for Kamalji. Even then, I bet Kamal or anyone cannot beat VPKattabomman. Over 40 years have been passed since Kattabomman release, no tamil actor has beaten his performance. So, it won't happen for another 40-50 years.

---

what do you want to say. Kamal has to do VPKattabomman and has to show that he is better than Shivaji. Even i also feel that Marudhanaayagam may not come. That may not prove that he cannot excel in historic roles. It is all to do with people's current taste and budget. But if Marudhanaayagam come without any doubt it will be a milestone. Let us hope kamal gets the money needed for making that movie.

Every body talks about VPkattabomman. I however did not watch the full movie. Seen only in parts. Without any doubt he did a great performance with body language and dialogue delivery. I was not sure on one thing. If we talk VPkattaomman as a character then definetly there should be some action scenes like fighting with the sword,etc. Did those scenes there in the movie? If yes, did shivaji did a good show in those scenes. I dont know as i did not see the full movie. Can anybody clear me on this? If he did not do well in those scenes then that movie is incomplete as per my opinion.

Quote:

---

Sivaji had limitations too: action movies. MGR was good in editing, direction. Kamal is a total package, he does everything. Kamal is one of the best we got now!!

---

You started accepting more things. Good.
:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thirumaran

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joe

Thirumaran,
Everybody knows that MGR is better in action compare to Nadigar thilagam ..But my point is Nadigar Thilagam has tried MGR type action movies and succeed most of them ,if not all .whereas Makkal Thilagam tried few Sivaji type movies and miserably failed..that is the difference..hope you understand

//I did not say anything like Shivaji is Zero in acting, Shivaji is pathetic in acting like that//

Don't be too smart and sarcastic .If you have said so,no body would have argued with you and treat you as a .......

---

So if shivaji succeeded in some action roles means that he is on par with MGR in action? If MGR succeeded in charater roles you would have said MGR is on Par with Shivaji in character roles? Is that what you are arguing?

People said i was bashing shivaji. Can you point out some of my words which you feels like bashing? But some people mentioned the words like zero in acting, pathetic, etc.. for MGR which is what is called bashing? That is what i said.

Is that now everybody treating them as a ..... ? as per your words.

But you people are praising them for their bashing like this.

I am not acting too smart. It is what some of you trying to be smart?

:(

---

ThiruMaran,

Are you really have any eye sight problem?

My first line
// Everybody knows that MGR is better in action compare to Nadigar thilagam //

You are asking me
//So if shivaji succeeded in some action roles means that he is on par with MGR in action?//

How to argue with you?

Anyway ,For a last try ,let me tell you..pls read it before jumping.

You tried to prove sivaji is big zero in action as if he never attempt or succeed in action..That is why I have mentioned that atleast sivaji have tried action ,which is not his cup of tea,and succeed too in some movies ,where as MGR tried some sivaji type of movies ,but he failed miserably in all his movies .

So the truth is ,even though MGR is superior in action compare to sivaji ,sivaji also proved he can do action and people accepted in some movies ..but MGR was rejected by audience whenever he tried to do sivaji type of movies.

Aala viduppa..ithukku mela vilakkam solla mudiyathu

Thirumaran,

You are too emotional; cool off man. You are mixing the forum topic, this topic was originally a MGR thread. You, as a single person, virtually changed it to Sivaji vs Kamal fight. You need to go back to original topic and come out with a convincing list of MGR movies that every member of this forum will like. Please keep in mind that this is a public forum, so every member will jump in and praise or hate your statement. Be prepared to accept it. When you come out with a list of MGR movies, just do not stop with Madurai veeran, Kanchi thalaivan,NM, AP, USV (last three were made by MGR himself); you need to provide more movies and details to convince other forum members.

I like good cinema. I am a sivaji fan. I did not have any difficulty to give this forum a list of movies (16 movies) to show case Nadigar thilagam's versatility and also I added that many more can be given. I could continue that list, but it will be endless. That was Sivaji's power and I also mentioned his limit in doing action roles. As Joe and others highlighted, Sivaji acted in some very successful action movies, egs: Raja, Engal thanga raaja, thirisoolam. I heard Thirisoolam collection was so huge that Government of TN under MGR had to change the rule to collect the tax. That show cases his power and only after a very long time, Bhagyaraj movie (mundhanai mudichi) beat that collection. Even his movie Sandhipoo (dual role, one acted with Sridevi, as you were mentioning above) of Sivaji Productions was a super hit movie and it ran silver jubilee in every major centers.

You need to keep in mind, for Sivaji, there was no body before him to be compared. But, you have got a base line for Kamal, you are comparing Kamal with Sivaji. Kamal is a good actor/director/dancer, but according to my view, the comparison of sivaji vs kamal does not have any merit. Just one point: All Sivaji movies (in 50/60s and partly 70s) were kind of experimentation movies. He succeded in a big way including commercially, and his success rate was so big that was never witnessed before in tamil cinema (Read Randor guy's article in The Hindu, most of his articles still available in Hindu's archives). Some of his movies were way ahead of time, example: Andha Naal, Thooku Thooki, Uthmaa Puthiran, Puthiya Paravai. Kamal experimentation movies lack something. Some of his movies, though quality movies, fail at the BO collection, example: aalavandhan, hey raam, AS, MXpress,Raja Paarvai etc. I like Kamal's good movies, like Devar Magan was great, almost a classic (sivaji and revathy role in the movie made a big difference, that is entirely a different story).

In my last post, I was not asking you to show me an actor who can make VPKattabomman. I was challenging you whether any other actor can beat SIVAJI's PERFORMANCE, not to make the kattabomman again. Let me reiterate my point: Sivaji is UNIQUE in acting, his success cannot be repeated and that is why I said earlier that Sivaji is a genius in his own way. This opinion was concurred by many great actors, like Bollywood's Dilip Kumar and Hollywood's Marlyn Brando. Sivaji's presence was so powerful that he virtually defined what an acting is and people accepted that definition. TN agreed that "nadipirkku illakkanam Sivaji" and no body can come close to that. IMO, Kamal is a good actor; to bring more out of Kamal, he should act under very talented directors. There was always some rumour that Kamal does not go well with most of directors; i dont know how far it is true.

Any way, I want to stop sivaji vs kamal argument. I am expecting some good writing about MGR movies from Thiru.

I have to go now and have a great and prosperous tamilzhar tirunaal PONGAL.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thirumaran

Hey tacinema,

Quote:

---

How do you define romance? Tamizharasan said Kamal is the best romantic hero. Kamal was a handsome hero, for eg. in vazhve maayam, he looked great as a romantic hero. But not any more. Now, he mixes romance/love with something else. West may accept his concept, but not TN.

---

So you want kamal to do more romantic roles at the age of 50. Did shivaji excelled in romantic roles at the later ages. I remember shivaji doing romance with Sridevi in some movie which looks pathetic. But even at this age if Kamal do some romance it wont be pathetic.
By the way I was not refering to kissing alone when we talk of romance.

Quote:

---

IMO, for romance, your eyes should talk with a girl, talk softly, almost seduce her. Gemini was the best here, he could love a girl without touching her. Eg. Then nilavu/Kalyana Parisu. If you watch Sivaji's V.Maaligai/Ooty V uravu/Puthiya paravai, you will see his love scene performance definitely exceeds Kamal's. The issue is Kamal's tamil pronunciation, it sounds somewhat artificial (in love scenes) when compared to gemini/sivaji.

---

I also can give some definitions on romance. So what? Have you not seen 'Ek dujhe ke liye' or 'Telugu version' of that.
Is that not good enough to say Kamal is great in romance. Of course the phenomenal box office success of those movies can say that. Tamil dialogues of Kamal looks artificial in romance scenes.
:lol: Very sad that he did some great romance movie in different language but could not do well in his mother tongue.

Quote:

---

Just to illustrate more, watch a scene in VMaaligai, when sivaji takes Vanisree to his Palace and goes for a lengthy dialogue...though it may not happen in real life, but it was a great scene to watch!!

---

Cool. Yes. You accepted one thing. The lengthy dialogues which shivaji talks in allmost all his movies will never happen in real life. That is why we say shivaji over does many of his character including the one you mentioned. That is why one of the reasons he could not get any national award for best actor in his period.

Quote:

---

Sivaji had limitations too: action movies. MGR was good in editing, direction. Kamal is a total package, he does everything. Kamal is one of the best we got now!!

---

Quote:

---

Thirumaran talked about history movies and said Kamal's Marudanayagam will show case his talent. Let Marudanayagam come first and i wish a big success for Kamalji. Even then, I bet Kamal or anyone cannot beat VPKattabomman. Over 40 years have been passed since Kattabomman release, no tamil actor has beaten his performance. So, it won't happen for another 40-50 years.

---

what do you want to say. Kamal has to do VPKattabomman and has to show that he is better than Shivaji. Even i also feel that Marudhanaayagam may not come. That may not prove that he cannot excel in historic roles. It is all to do with people's current taste and budget. But if Marudhanaayagam come without any doubt it will be a milestone. Let us hope kamal gets the money needed for making that movie.

Every body talks about VPkattabomman. I however did not watch the full movie. Seen only in parts. Without any doubt he did a great performance with body language and dialogue delivery. I was not sure on one thing. If we talk VPkattaomman as a character then definetly there should be some action scenes like fighting with the sword,etc. Did those scenes there in the movie? If yes, did shivaji did a good show in those scenes. I dont know as i did not see the full movie. Can anybody clear me on this? If he did not do well in those scenes then that movie is incomplete as per my opinion.

Quote:

---

Sivaji had limitations too: action movies. MGR was good in editing, direction. Kamal is a total package, he does everything. Kamal is one of the best we got now!!

---

You started accepting more things. Good.
:)

---

good one

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tacinema

I like Kamal's good movies, like Devar Magan was great, almost a classic (sivaji and revathy role in the movie made a big difference, that is entirely a different story).

---

tacinema,
If Dhevar Magan is not a true classic, then I would say there never was a classic in Tamil cinema ! :huh:
U sound like, u don't really want to appreciate Kamal ! :huh: I think u didn't know that Dhevar Magan was written by Kamal ! Which means Shivaji's role, revathy's role & everything else was written by Kamal .
8-)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vasanth_luv

tacinema,
If Dhevar Magan is not a true classic, then I would say there never was a classic in Tamil cinema ! :huh:
U sound like, u don't really want to appreciate Kamal ! :huh: I think u didn't know that Dhevar Magan was written by Kamal ! Which means Shivaji's role, revathy's role & everything else was written by Kamal .
8-)

---

I noticed it many times................................. :roll:

Tacinema,
Great write up!
Thamizhar ThiruNaal Vazhthukkal to you too!

:lol2:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joe

ThiruMaran,

Are you really have any eye sight problem?

My first line
// Everybody knows that MGR is better in action compare to Nadigar thilagam //

You are asking me
//So if shivaji succeeded in some action roles means that he is on par with MGR in action?//

How to argue with you?

Anyway ,For a last try ,let me tell you..pls read it before jumping.

You tried to prove sivaji is big zero in action as if he never attempt or succeed in action..That is why I have mentioned that atleast sivaji have tried action ,which is not his cup of tea,and succeed too in some movies ,where as MGR tried some sivaji type of movies ,but he failed miserably in all his movies .

So the truth is ,even though MGR is superior in action compare to sivaji ,sivaji also proved he can do action and people accepted in some movies ..but MGR was rejected by audience whenever he tried to do sivaji type of movies.

Aala viduppa..ithukku mela vilakkam solla mudiyathu

---

My goodness. ?When did i say Shivaji is Zero in action scenes or anything menas the same.
:cry:
I think i said when it comes to action scene MGR and Kamal are better. Ok. Leave it. I accept that i have a sight problem.
But i can show that people said MGR is zero / pathetic in character roles? If the movies which MGR did character roles failing does not mean that he is pathetic/Zero in character roles. The reason may be people are not interested in MGR doing that role as people always kept MGR as something above all human. When others were saying that why you people are not coming forward to condemn that iy you guys are neutral fans. That is my point.
But I am not sure whether all the movies where MGR did the character roles failed in box office as i am not the one from past generation.

I initially said one thing for which some people started jumping. Definetly i am not jumping.
Mr Tacinema,
Just only one thing for you. You have said that i started the argument. If you go back and see you can understand that i was never interested in any kind of comparisions/ argument. The other only started that and i also continued

I said only one statement. I said that, not in the meaning you people thought and i explained the same in other of my posts too.
For that very general statement people started comparision for which i also continued.
Now everybody asking me to cool thinking that they were really cool.

Everything My bad.
Once again i feel sorry if i have hurted anyone.

Quote:

---

But i can show that people said MGR is zero / pathetic in character roles? If the movies which MGR did character roles failing does not mean that he is pathetic/Zero in character roles. The reason may be people are not interested in MGR doing that role as people always kept MGR as something above all human. When others were saying that why you people are not coming forward to condemn that iy you guys are neutral fans. That is my point.

---

excellent

Quote:

---

Now everybody asking me to cool thinking that they were really cool.

---

:thumbsup:

Thirumaran,

Cool down friend! Cheers!

//But I am not sure whether all the movies where MGR did the character roles failed in box office as i am not the one from past generation. //

He he..neither me..Just because I am sivaji fan ,don't think I am a oldy..I may be the same age group,if not may be 2 or 3 older than you ,I guess.

Sorry for the digression.

Quote:

---

can anyone educate annE that action is not confined to *fights*

---

Kasi,

Unga vazhikke naan varren..

Have you seen Nayagan,Sathya,Guna,Kuruthipunal and Alavandhan????

Enakku onnume puriyaleppa... ella Rajini fans-m Baasha...Baahsa-nu en solreengha??

Oru dhadava sonna nooru dhadava sonna madhiri-nu dialogue vitta udane super movie-a??

It may be the best Rajini's action movie. but not one of the best action movies like Nayagan,Sathya,Guna and Kuruthipunal.

Even Vadivelu-kku black color-la coat-m,Black color-la glass-m matti vittu, pinnadi oru 5 perai nippatti vacha
He also will looks like Action hero..

Rajaram ....

Endraya mathaapu koluthi vitaachaa !!

Beyond doubt, Basha is Basha....noone can come near him.....
Please dont ever degrade the Basha character by inserting Vaigaipuyal.....
Basha is one of the top5 roles of RK....

Neenga sonna Kuruthipunal was much better in Hindi compared to Tamil version as Ompuri and Naseeruddin shah's acting was far more NATURAL ...
The Hindi version of Satya....SUnny deol did extremely well....

Bye

Quote:

---

Neenga sonna Kuruthipunal was much better in Hindi compared to Tamil version as Ompuri and Naseeruddin shah's acting was far more NATURAL ...

---

But Kuruthi punal(Tamil version)only went to OSCAR NOMINEE.:lol:

//Neenga sonna Kuruthipunal was much better in Hindi compared to Tamil version//

Really?

I heard that Govind Nihalini acknowledged that Kuruthipunal is better version in all aspects compared to it's original Thurookal.

What do you guys think about MGR's double role especially in Kudierundha koil,Naalai namadhe in which he changed the face to black color?

In Maatukara velan....MG did well in dual role....the one that of a maatukaran and another a lawyer...

Another one should be Enga veetu pillai...

one very strong and energetic and another romba bayandhaangulli

At 35, Kamal released Aboorva Sagodharargal(1989)
At 35, Rajini released Nallavanakku Nallavan(1984)
At 35, Sivaji released Aalayamani(1962)
At 35, Vaathiyar released Andaman Kaidhi(1952)
At 35, Thala will release Naan, Kadavul(2006)

At 25, Kamal released Kalyanaraman(1979)
At 25, Sivaji released Barasakthi(1952)
At 25, Vaathiyar released Dhasippen(1942)
At 25, Thala released Kadhal Kottai(1996)

:thumbsup:

MGR.........is he better than shivaji ...i always thought ...he used to act in such a manner .such tht it wins the hearts of the people ..whu end up bleving he is some god or somethign and then one day he ll make it to the legislatives