Sivamalaji
Thanks for your explanation too.Will ask you more questions when i have doubts :-)
Printable View
Sivamalaji
Thanks for your explanation too.Will ask you more questions when i have doubts :-)
Viggopji, thank you and best regards.
. .
homam: The Sans root `juh` allegedly meaning "offer to fire". is fabricated from thamiz "°ú" (verb).
°ú (verb) > °úò¾ø = pouring as for example pouring onto fire. (one of the meanings of this word).
°ú (¾Á¢ú) > ƒ¤ (ºÁò¸¢Õ¾õ).
°ú/°üÚ ±ýÀÉ ´§Ã ãÄòÐî ¦º¡ü¸û. Would not digress into that.
compare: ¯Â¢÷ > ¢÷ > ƒ¢ù (>ƒ£Åý).
ºÁò¸¢Õ¾õ ±ÎòÐ즸¡ñ¼ Àøġ¢Ãõ ¾¢Ã¡Å¢¼î ¦º¡ü¸Ç¢ø °ú ±ýÀÐõ ´ýÚ.
°ú > (°{ú}Áõ) > µÁõ > §†¡Á¡ (Skrt).
casting clarified butter into the fire.
compare: À¡ú > (À¡{ú}Åõ) > À¡Åõ.
Brahman pre-existed the Vedas (per Gilbert Slater) and similar god has been found in Egyptian culture. But the word Brahman is from À¢È(/Ã)+õ+«ý or ÀÃ+õ+«ý. Ancient Egypt had trade relationships with Tamiz states.
Shoyonika,Quote:
Originally Posted by shoyonika
you know that some ilks here are just like Frogs in well. Frogs in a well think that their well is the deepest and its croaking sound is the sweetest in the world. Little they realize what lies outside. Thats what is being done here....
And Indianxxxx is the biggest frog of all :lol: :lol: :lol:
:rotfl:
To confirm that "homa" is a Dravidian word from Tamil root:
1. Sans is/was an Indo-Euro language. 1/3 of its lexical base is clearly Indo-Euro in origin. (proven fact.) 2/3 of it: Dravidian largely, Munda and other lingos too. (proven fact).
2. Homa has no Indo-European homonym.
3. It can be directly connected to the Tamil word uuzththal. (as shown above). (using rules on word corruption patterns and rules on interchangeability between Dravidian and Indo-Euro).
4. The basic meaning ("casting" (clarified butter into fire) of the words: is strikingly similar between roots °(úò¾ø) and juh.
5. To me, the homa practice does not seem to be Indo-Euro in origin. There is practice of casting things into fire as a ritual in Chinese taoism. More research may be needed on this speicific point.
The Chinese word "uu" "°" means "present" or "have" and is a Íð¼Êî ¦º¡ø (demonstrative) and has a meaning similar to Tamil "uL" ¯û (¯ûÇÐ). A remote connection cannot be ruled out on the etymology of these two words °ú(ò¾ø) and Chinese °. I will conclude that homa is not Indo-Euro practice unless I come across further evidence later.
6. Homa < µÁõ is therefore a Tamil word.
Hi mahadevan, nice try but without any luck. Samskrith never requires any advantage over tamil to prove its supremacy, or dominance over roots and words. Fabrications are used by recent languages to just try to compare themselves with Samskrith, in which they have lost the true meaning they want to convey. Samskrith is so dignified that no need has of late been found to reverse engineer anything to form a word or to discuss anything intellectual. Samskrith, and use words from other languages, for that you need to be given a 1st prize in joking. Lastly there is no need of definitive advantages for a language whose writing and word expression itself is incomplete. Just try to write the word Samskrith as it is pronounced in tamil and you can yourself find its so called efficiency against Samskrith.Quote:
Hi Shoyonika, since Tamil lit clearly states what it wants to state, we can discuss the intellectual content of it any language, this is a definitive advantage of Tamil over sanskrit, sanskrit requires a great degree of fabrication/reverse engineering to derive something sensible. Since such fabrications in sanskrit often uses the inefficiencies of the language it makes sense to treat sanskrit lit in sanskrit only.
Inian is right!! There were many who saw the truth......Quote:
Originally Posted by inian
They (Sanskritists ) had no name for the religion. The Iranians gave the name!
They (Sanskritists ) had no name for their holy books. The Tamils gave the names.
Such is the plight of the frogs in the well.
That explains the plight of people saying Samskrith is derived from Irani or persian. :lol:
Easiest thing to escape is if you cannot prove tamil older, just say Samskrith is a derivative of persian. But they are not even of the same grammatical setup. Irani or farsi or persian is just the language branch of Indo european language, whereas Samskrith is the head for all the Indo-european language, though has a number of, needs no proofs.
What about Bharatha`s religion`s name? well even a small boy with minimum knowledge would tell the reason for it. There was no need for a religion until the advent of the westerners as the people lived peacefully following Varnashrama systems, and the name if required would be given Vedic religion. So, name of religion was needed only to distinguish between Bharathiyas and pashchatyas. Now what was that about tamil names for Samskrith works? :lol: try to find tamil roots for manimekhalai and silpadhikaram, as joining diphthongs as ai in the end wont tamilise Samskrith.
Lastly people are becoming cultured using Samskrith phrases like frog in the well that is, `koopa manduka`. Sorry for puncturing feelings. Better luck next time.