correct cr.. it was subroto banerjee.. he bowled well in that match.. he moved the ball both the ways, as against srinath who was bowling only inswingers
Printable View
correct cr.. it was subroto banerjee.. he bowled well in that match.. he moved the ball both the ways, as against srinath who was bowling only inswingers
Oh Cummins-A....atleast Patterson was the non-strikernu ninaikkarEn.Quote:
Originally Posted by mgb
last over ..I meant last over of the match (happAdA ! eppidiyO samALichAchchu).
How come they didn't use Ravi Shasthri ? I remember he played the match..and made 120 ball 30 something :-)
CR, adhE adhE.
i think ambrose got the man of the match in that tied one dayer for his 2 for 9 and 35 odd run partnership with cummins.. appaadi some thing relevant to this thread..
Cummins was the non-striker. Kapil Dev Flitnoff-Lee vaidhyam-lam koduthaaru Cummins-kuQuote:
Originally Posted by Prabhu Ram
(Avainga apdi thaan establish paNNa try pannuvanga, namma othukka padadhu, muthirai kuthiduvainga:lol:)
:rotfl: :rotfl2:Quote:
Originally Posted by crajkumar_be
(CR, sema form-la irukkeenga pola!)
Banerjee was hard done by. Nalla thaan pottan. Epdiyo kazhatti vuttutainga.Quote:
Originally Posted by mgb
In the 92 World Cup, India had a close match against England. Banerjee and Srinath brought India to the brink of victory thanks to the former's big hits. And he was doing it calmly. Srinath was a nervous wreck meanwhile.
Vazhakkam pOla, last over-la, thevai illama non-striker end-lerundhu vegama Odi poyi run out aayi we lost by 9 runs. When they were returning to the pavilion, you could see Banerjee calmly walking back and Srinath berating him as though it was Banerjee's fault
1. Banerjee was the one who was hitting big, so he had to be on strike even if there was a run in that shot it had to be ignored since that would bring Srinath on strike
2. There was no run for that shot!
3. Our daddhi still ran and got run out - for what, I ask?
4. And then made a big show of berating Banerjee
That day, I learnt the value of CYA. Thappu nadandha parava illai, adhai mathavanga mela pazhi podum thiramai vENum. Appo dhaan pozhaikka mudiyum-nu naan katRa naal adhu.
Srinath-kum mela dhaddhi na adhu raju dhaan. In the same world cup, with 4 to win, Srinath hits a trademark vertical sixer (i.e.) huge height - actually, the batsmen could have easily ran 3 for that shot. But our Raju is paraaaku parthufying as Steve Waugh drops the catch but throws back the ball. By the time Raju completes the second run, Srinath has caught up with him at the non strikers crease for his third run :rotfl:
Indha dhaddhi paraaakku parthundu run out aayi we lost by one run. Ozhunga Odi irundha tie aayirukkum. Enna Kodumaiyana kaalangaL avai.
:rotfl2: :rotfl2:Quote:
Originally Posted by crajkumar_be
Over lollu !!! :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by crajkumar_be
Plum,
Banerjee was eased off because he was thoroughly unfit for a fast bowler. If he bowls a dozen overs, you could expect him to stay off the ground for the next couple of days. Case in point is the sydney test in australia 91-92. We badly needed a bowler to finish off Aussies and our man was quietly recovering in the hut.
Ironically Shastri was a match winner in that game, 30-odd of 110 balls or so. No other player could last half the time on that perfect fast bowling pitch.
I still recollect Srinath bowling a beauty to clean Arthurton first ball.
Then there was that Ambrose six off Kapil towards the end. If I remember right, Cummins survived a confident shout for lbw one ball before he edged to Azhar.
The video of the game is floating somewhere on the net I think..