61.4
Bracewell to Lyon, no run
appeal for lbw, the umpire rules it not out and Taylor has called for a review.
Tension! Tension! Tension!
Printable View
61.4
Bracewell to Lyon, no run
appeal for lbw, the umpire rules it not out and Taylor has called for a review.
Tension! Tension! Tension!
Whattay Test Match! Bracewell :clap: Warner :clap: :bow:
This is why I LOVE Test Matches!
Unbelievable test match. Tie should have been the fair result. Lyon and Warner were batting so well, anyway very good win for NZ. :clap: Well deserved.
Master, have they employed DRS in our series?
:clap: NZ's
Southee: "That was too close to comfort. A nail-biting finish. It's the first time we've done that since some of us have been alive. It was a great innings right through from Warner. We've got a great fielding side, we believe in our fielders, and we did a great job in the slips."
பேட்டிங், பௌலிங் இவைகள் அவ்வப்போது செத்துப் பிழைத்தாலும் இந்த ஒரு டிபார்ட்மென்ட் மட்டுமே இன்னும் நியுசிலாந்திற்கு வரம்.
Bracewell...what a bowling figure! :notworthy:
MiddleOrder : Ricky, Clarke, Hussey,
Tail : Pattinson, Starc, Lyon
Both these sections failed against Bracewell!!
Newzeland :clap: :clap: :clap:
super match....It could auger well for test cricket if this standard is kept up for every match....already exited for the border gavaskar series.....
No DRS please! In India matches, it is solely used to refer close decisions in favour of India(and overturn them) while india's referrals will not be favoured. If employed correctly it can be useful for India but ICC umpires and match officials go through"anti-india" training so we have no use for DRS. When we place our Bansals and Singhals in the elite panel, then we can opt for DRS.
Yes. And it added more drama during the final hour.Quote:
Originally Posted by sathya_1979