Feddy, indha threadaiyum konjam Adharichu vaLarththu kudunga. We have only two weeks to close everything.
IPL mudinjavuNE Test Team ArambikalAm.
Printable View
Feddy, indha threadaiyum konjam Adharichu vaLarththu kudunga. We have only two weeks to close everything.
IPL mudinjavuNE Test Team ArambikalAm.
Shane Keith Warne 8-) Saqlain is a good choice too.
Choices so far
Warne
Murali
Saqlain
That is all?
Anyone interested in Harby, Dan the man or the KSCA president?
How about Hauritz?
Or CSK Fans: Ashwin?
Take my 2 other NOM's plum
Daniel Vettori
Anil Kumble
3 options nominate seiyalaam la.. so here you go..
Murali
Warne
last option to be added later :mrgreen:
:shock: :shock:Quote:
Originally Posted by Plum
Hauritz ah? :roll: A Giles eh thevalam..Quote:
Originally Posted by Plum
Some other options people might consider
Brad Hogg
Stuart MacGill
Saqlain Mushtaq
Mushtaq Ahmed
Daniel Vettori
H Singh
My nominations:
Shane Warne & Murali, to compare these two legends, I always prefer Warne ahead of Murali.
If we take the Aus team during Warne's prime period, it had a very good pace bowling attack in the name of McGra, Fleming, Gillespie.. Most of the time, they had their fair share of top order wickets in their initial spells.So warne had to tackle only the middle order or lower middle order. So out of say 6 wickets, he was stil able to pick up 3 wickets avg. He was very effective there in NOT only picking up wickets regularly but also containing the runs. Warne even dominated whenever their pacers failed and also his performance in crunch games like 99 SF was invaluable for Aus to win the world Cup.
In case of Murali, he had almost been given the whole 10 wickets since the only effective bowler was Vaas. This is one of the main reasons for Murali's better stats than Warne. Of course, NOT taking any credit away from Murali, he is still a legend but his match winning performance on crucial matches are still questionable compared to Warne.
apart from Murali & Warne, I would nominate Saqlain simply because the way he bowls in the slog overs. That was the time where spin bowlers were NOT at all given a bowl in the slog.