Quote:
Originally Posted by jaiganes
IF someone says anything wrong about IR's singing, I just tell them one word - 'Thiruvasagam' - In my opinion the best playback singer in the industry - Balu sir also would not have sung it that well. Bhaava is the most important aspect when it comes to film singing and devotional singing more than ability to sing complex aalaaps and intricate bruhas. In this aspect he is right up there. I did not think much of his singing 'romantic' songs till i heard 'Thendral vandhu' and 'Saamak kozhi'. So he is a complete singer with great deal of knowledge - verenna vendum unakku? :-)
Yes, the best thing he did with Thiruvasagam was to sing the songs himself.
I wanted to touch upon this point, or allegation rather - the stress on his bhava and an implication of his alleged technical weaknesses and imperfections. Being someone whose interest and passion for music is not matched by sound theory or practice, i'm still going to stick my neck out and say that too much is made of his so-called technical inadequacies, unfairly. He has handled brihas, gamakams and many ragas as good as any other singer. I think the problem is with his voice (he has a deep 'bass' voice and hence it is natural) in higher octaves but that does not mean he is all bhava and technically inadequate . Are there issues apart from pitching or sounding awkward at high pitches? Experts may clarify.