Negative shades on the real HEROES

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar

Negative Side of Kamal - http://tjshome.com/images/userfilter...24P_negate.jpg

---

:rotfl3:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sunil_M88

Kamal ji in Indian

The corrupt son (Chandu) of Senapathy can be considered as a negative role

---

Sunil

IMHO, I dont think Kamal can be as menancing as Raghuvaran, Rajni, Sathyaraj and Prakashraj alike, it just does not work for him.

Param - Have you seen Sigappu RojakkaL or Aalavandhan?

+1. Aalavandhan for sure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RC

Param - Have you seen Sigappu RojakkaL or Aalavandhan?

---

Ofcourse RC, infact I have seen SR many times, Alavandhan he was good in that Mottai Getup. But others were not that good. I have seen Most of kamal films .

Like I said , these are just my views that is all :)

negative roles which stays put and hence I recall easily

Sivaji : andha naaL :bow:
kamalhassan : sigappu rojakkaL
rajnikant: avargaL, chitti robo,
sivakumar: bhuvana oru keLvikkuri
sathyaraj: amaidhip padai
Prakashraj: ghilli

thats all, rest of them comes after second consideration.

Sivakumar in -ve roles , that would have been hilarious :rotfl: He only suits for soft hearted Character .

Sorry SP akka did not mean to be rude :)

SP akka

Rajni was far more menancing in Moondru Mudichu than Avargal :)

And how come the Great Raghuvaran is misiing in ur list :x

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN

Ofcourse RC, infact I have seen SR many times, Alavandhan he was good in that Mottai Getup. But others were not that good. I have seen Most of kamal films .

Like I said , these are just my views that is all :)

---

When you said "I dont think Kamal can be as menancing as Raghuvaran, Rajni, Sathyaraj and Prakashraj alike, it just does not work for him.", I dont know what more you expect... :)
If aalavandhan's nandhu isnt menacing enough, I'm not sure what/where your expectations lie.
I forgot to add Dasavatharam's Fletcher...

raghu,

have u seen bhuvana :roll:
negative role does not NECESSARILY mean "motta boss" roles or gangster and cheapo villains. Role of avargaL in rajni was a saddistic char. Sivakumar was a selfish char. Negative neverthless. He underplayed his role and definitely convincing. May be since rajni was playing along, sivakumar couldn't shine :D

somehow "avargaL" is the first movie which I recollect, yeah moondru mudichu was great too. May be I believe real villains are too choclatey and sweet grinning right next to u and doing all possible jobs which motta bosses cannot do :) I consider such roles REALISITIC.

ennathu rude aa.... when do I ever take any movie indifferences to heart.
neekku neevu
naaku naanu :D

raghuvaran...hmm...yes.... baasha was good :)