Shah Rukh Khan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alwarpet_andavan

Hyderabadi,
Rajni is originally from AP? Thanks for enlightening me. and where is Shah Rukh from, huh? Nagaland?????
Get your facts right. We don't need certificates from the West-aping Bollywood industry. Try this excercise - Capture your wedding (if you aren't married yet) in a decent format. Mix some songs and absolutely pathetic rerecording (if you know what that means) taken from "Ramayana" serial and make sure you were only designer clothes - Sherwani or western. Have a big Bollywood gun as a producer and distribute it through Sahara entertainment and you have a Bollywood hit there.

And DLaxmi or whoever it was, comparing SRK and Rajni - don't take the "holier-than-thou" stand, siding with Bollywood. The very idea that Bollywood is superior smacks of an arrogant attitude bordering on color discrimination.

---

And where is Rajini originally from then? Based on his full name, i am 100% sure he is not originally from TN. And, i am sorry if you are in denial that bollywood is the greatest film industry in India...i can't help you with that issue. I haven't found one non-bollywood film in India that comes anywhere close to a good bollywood film...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dlaxmi16

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hyderbadi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dlaxmi16

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MADDY

mani needs to have SRK in his unit if he intends to get back some money....... :D

---

if he need money he can make rajni to do that role.other than money the film must come out to be a classic.thats important

---

Maniratnam's thalapathy with Rajni, was not a great hit !! May be he doesn't want to take a second chance.. :)

---

WHAT HAPPENED TO DIL SE?UTTER FLOP.BUT THALAPATHI IS A HIT.
NAME ONE SHARUK MOVIE WHICH GAINED AS MUCH AS CHANDRAMUKHI?

---

Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayeng
Veer-Zaara
Kuch Kuch Hota Hai

---

Dil to pagal hain
Baazigar
Karan Arjun


:)

---

do u know the collection of chandramukhi is an all time record in india.nearing 100 crores.may reach it.if sharuk is all india star he should have done it.but rajni a regional super star does it easily.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dlaxmi16

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hyderbadi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alwarpet_andavan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hyderbadi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MADDY

mani needs to have SRK in his unit if he intends to get back some money....... :D

---

if he need money he can make rajni to do that role.other than money the film must come out to be a classic.thats important

---

If he replaces SRK with Rajini, his film will be a complete flop. Almost no one outside of TN even knows who Rajini is...

---

RAJINI IS WELL-KNOWN IN SOUTH INDIA.ARE U AWARE OF CHANDRAMUKHI'S HIT IN SOUTH INDIA?

---

Nilavu,
For our Hyderabadi friend, anything to do with TN & AP is not good enough and no matter how hard you try to drill facts into him, he won't budge. He suffers from cognitive dissonance.
BTW, is Shah Rukh dancing in anybody's wedding this month? And any new wedding/college galatta from the Karan Johar camp?

---

Rajini is known in AP(since he is originally from there)....in a bad way though. People look at him as a terrible actor and regularly laugh him. No one respects him in AP.

---

Pls lets stop comparing Sharukh & Rajni..Rajni is no way close to Sharukh..
Rajni may be superstar of Tamil Movies...Lets compare him with his own competitors in tamil industry..Till now not even one actor from Tamil Industry could make it big in Hindi Industry..What do you say about that..
:)

---

why should a tamil actor should make it big in hindi industry.can u name one hindi actor made a name in tamil industry.our kamal haasan gave many blockbusters in hindi
ekduje keliye
saagar
chachi 420
saadma etc

one hindi actor shined in tamil industry?no
if they dont want to shine in tamil why must we?
we are getting world importance here itself.ok?

Hyderabadi,
Your ignorance is so much that its stopped irritating me and its started humoring me :) In fact, i owe you entertainment tax!
Rajni is a Maharshtrian (Shivaji Rao Gaekwad) by birth, brought up in Bangalore (and practically a Kannadiga in that sense). Yeah, he's not from TN. So what?
Which state do you associate Bollywood with? Maharashtra? If so, most of the blokes are not from Maharashtra. It doesn't prove anything right?
And just because you haven't seen any S.Indian movie not good enough for your bollywood standards doesn't mean there aren't better non-Bollywood movies. Get it? Or do you need subtitles in Hindi???? (Poornima, thanks for the phrase :))
Of course there are great S.Indian movies just like there are great Bollywood movies. Accept that or bury your head in the sand like an Ostrich.

Coming back to the topic, in my book, SRK had(s) a lot of promise but somehow he hasn't broken out of his stereotype. Movies like Swades would be a welcome change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

why should a tamil actor should make it big in hindi industry.can u name one hindi actor made a name in tamil industry.our kamal haasan gave many blockbusters in hindi
ekduje keliye
saagar
chachi 420
saadma etc

one hindi actor shined in tamil industry?no
if they dont want to shine in tamil why must we?
we are getting world importance here itself.ok?

---

Right said Fred :thumbsup: :clap: :thumbsup:
Nethi adi!
And moreover, if people like DLaxmi and HyderaBADi speak one more word about S.Indian actors color etc. (even if they don't use that word, you dont need to be Einsteen to infer what they imply) they should be transported to places like S.Africa where apartheid is still believed to be practiced under the hood

[quote="dlaxmi16"]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sanju

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dlaxmi16

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sanju

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sanju

ok laxmi, lets not talk about kamal, lal, mammootty. still there are a lot of good actors in hindi commercial cinema. srk is the most saleable star in hindi cinema. but its ajay devgan who can be called as a versatile actor. nana patekar, amir khan are also good actors. now dont speak ajay isn't a part of hindi commercial cinema. he has already bagged 2 national awards. he is a fantastic performer, and certainly a better actor than srk.

---

But here in this thread we aren't discussing about ajay devgan or aamir khan for that matter ..This thread is about Shahrukh khan, so lets discuss why he is a better actor..not discussing why he is not??
Maybe we should open another thread discussing about other actors like aamir or nana patekar or mammooty..

Just convincing that there are better actors than Shahrukh is not going to end this discussion..gone are the days of aamir or nana patekar or ajay devgan..

Shahrukh has given commendable performances consequetively in his recent movies like Kal ho na ho, Main Hoon Na, Veer Zaara , Swades & he will in future too..no one can challenge that . :)

---

next sharukh film will be a mixture of kuch kuch hota hai, mohabatein, dil to pagal hai and ddlj. after all he need a hit now. he is a perfect example of a steriotype actor.

for your kind information, ajay devgan is 100 times better actor than srk. srk must learn to perform versatile roles.

---

I think you have still not seen swades , veerzaara, main hoon na...pls watch all those movies & then give your statement ..
Shahrukh is a versatile actor ..he is proving it ..He has maintained himself the best actor over the past 15 yrs..that itself is a big challenge for a Splendid actor like Shahrukh..

:)

---

i hve seen all the 3 films you mentioned. swades is a better film and i think its one of his finest performances. but still he cant be termed as a versatile actor. a good actor without any versatility.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alwarpet_andavan

Hyderabadi,
Rajni is originally from AP? Thanks for enlightening me. and where is Shah Rukh from, huh? Nagaland?????
Get your facts right. We don't need certificates from the West-aping Bollywood industry. Try this excercise - Capture your wedding (if you aren't married yet) in a decent format. Mix some songs and absolutely pathetic rerecording (if you know what that means) taken from "Ramayana" serial and make sure you were only designer clothes - Sherwani or western. Have a big Bollywood gun as a producer and distribute it through Sahara entertainment and you have a Bollywood hit there.

And DLaxmi or whoever it was, comparing SRK and Rajni - don't take the "holier-than-thou" stand, siding with Bollywood. The very idea that Bollywood is superior smacks of an arrogant attitude bordering on color discrimination.

---

then what do u say about tamil movies....they are full of emotional melodrama, trying to catch the sentimental part of any mother, sister, daughter , son or dad in any family..Life is only a big problem in a tamil movie, there is sorrows& sadness all around...There is always a villain who wants to take revenge & then there is a hero , who has no muscles , no great body build up too..but he is ever ready to fight the enemies off..totally unbelievable..to watch a tamil movie..you only need some paper tissues or cloth towel..thats it..the amount of tears ..will show the number of days the movie will run.. :D :D
But a hindi movie is betteroff , they give you entertainment , we go to watch a movie , to enjoy ourselves ..not to spoil our hoilday..its high time..tamil movies try to change their method & trend..
:) :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dlaxmi16

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hyderbadi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dlaxmi16

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MADDY

mani needs to have SRK in his unit if he intends to get back some money....... :D

---

if he need money he can make rajni to do that role.other than money the film must come out to be a classic.thats important

---

Maniratnam's thalapathy with Rajni, was not a great hit !! May be he doesn't want to take a second chance.. :)

---

WHAT HAPPENED TO DIL SE?UTTER FLOP.BUT THALAPATHI IS A HIT.
NAME ONE SHARUK MOVIE WHICH GAINED AS MUCH AS CHANDRAMUKHI?

---

Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayeng
Veer-Zaara
Kuch Kuch Hota Hai

---

Dil to pagal hain
Baazigar
Karan Arjun


:)

---

do u know the collection of chandramukhi is an all time record in india.nearing 100 crores.may reach it.if sharuk is all india star he should have done it.but rajni a regional super star does it easily.

---

the earnings of chandramukhi is only expected that it will cross 100 crores..but it has not really achieved it.. :)

[quote="sanju"]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dlaxmi16

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sanju

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dlaxmi16

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sanju

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sanju

ok laxmi, lets not talk about kamal, lal, mammootty. still there are a lot of good actors in hindi commercial cinema. srk is the most saleable star in hindi cinema. but its ajay devgan who can be called as a versatile actor. nana patekar, amir khan are also good actors. now dont speak ajay isn't a part of hindi commercial cinema. he has already bagged 2 national awards. he is a fantastic performer, and certainly a better actor than srk.

---

But here in this thread we aren't discussing about ajay devgan or aamir khan for that matter ..This thread is about Shahrukh khan, so lets discuss why he is a better actor..not discussing why he is not??
Maybe we should open another thread discussing about other actors like aamir or nana patekar or mammooty..

Just convincing that there are better actors than Shahrukh is not going to end this discussion..gone are the days of aamir or nana patekar or ajay devgan..

Shahrukh has given commendable performances consequetively in his recent movies like Kal ho na ho, Main Hoon Na, Veer Zaara , Swades & he will in future too..no one can challenge that . :)

---

next sharukh film will be a mixture of kuch kuch hota hai, mohabatein, dil to pagal hai and ddlj. after all he need a hit now. he is a perfect example of a steriotype actor.

for your kind information, ajay devgan is 100 times better actor than srk. srk must learn to perform versatile roles.

---

I think you have still not seen swades , veerzaara, main hoon na...pls watch all those movies & then give your statement ..
Shahrukh is a versatile actor ..he is proving it ..He has maintained himself the best actor over the past 15 yrs..that itself is a big challenge for a Splendid actor like Shahrukh..

:)

---

i hve seen all the 3 films you mentioned. swades is a better film and i think its one of his finest performances. but still he cant be termed as a versatile actor. a good actor without any versatility.

---

you have liked shahrukh for his performances in Swades..that itself speaks volumes... :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nilavupriyan

Pls lets stop comparing Sharukh & Rajni..Rajni is no way close to Sharukh..
Rajni may be superstar of Tamil Movies...Lets compare him with his own competitors in tamil industry..Till now not even one actor from Tamil Industry could make it big in Hindi Industry..What do you say about that..
:)

---

why should a tamil actor should make it big in hindi industry.can u name one hindi actor made a name in tamil industry.our kamal haasan gave many blockbusters in hindi
ekduje keliye
saagar
chachi 420
saadma etc

one hindi actor shined in tamil industry?no
if they dont want to shine in tamil why must we?
we are getting world importance here itself.ok?[/quote]

Inspite of giving blockbusters kamal could not sustain himself in hindi movies...not bec kamal did not want to shine in hindi movies.:)
bec he was too south indianish..which is why he couldn't make it big in hindi movies..definitely hindi actors will not come to tamil movies to make it big..bec they are already doing it good in bollywood..all actresses & actors who were a big flop in hindi industry , come down to tamil industry..like kushboo, abbas, jyothika, nagma, asin, kiran, natasha,bhoomika,nagma,heera,trisha,reema sen, roopini, madhavan and many many more..

Only Sridevi could maintain her position in bollywood for many yrs who was from tamil industry.. :D