^no-ball+a run=target...whatever happens after that is irrelevant.. Sehwag was denied a 100 when Ramdiv overstepped for the same reason.
Printable View
^no-ball+a run=target...whatever happens after that is irrelevant.. Sehwag was denied a 100 when Ramdiv overstepped for the same reason.
sehwag was denied a hundred because the match was over the moment no-ball was bowled, in this case, a no-ball would result in level scores. when SA chased 434, they hit a 4 when scores were level, it was considered 438 and not 435 right?Quote:
Originally Posted by wizzy
^In the 434 match Boucher hit a 4 when the scores were level of a legal delivery and the batsman didn't cross whilst the ball reached the boundary..If Boucher had crossed the non-striker it would have constituted a run resulting in the ball being dead with the target reached and the four wouldn't be credited to him and final tally would have read 435. Hope this explains :)
perfect!! mikka nandri!!Quote:
Originally Posted by wizzy
Bresnan ruled out of Test series
nenjula yeri midhile, velaa-vula kuthule :redjump:.
Somebody pliss to open a thread for Pak-Eng series. kandippa hit aavum.
^with the bout of injuries to pacers looks like Monty Python will get to play :redjump:
will they seek the holy grail?? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by wizzy
Kallighan and Amalan are miliking the Zree Langans bowlers :rotfl:
Zouth Apreeka top beat Zree Langa again by an Innings, this time in ODI ! :lol2:
Please do the honors 8-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Puliyan_Biryani
Sri Lanka getting humiliated.. 13/5 now