Edhukku kEttEnnA, I have seen every other big name discussed in this forum. namakku idhu theriyadhunnu edhir katchi kaaranga nenachuda koodadhOlliyO? :-)
Printable View
Edhukku kEttEnnA, I have seen every other big name discussed in this forum. namakku idhu theriyadhunnu edhir katchi kaaranga nenachuda koodadhOlliyO? :-)
:D Chinatown definitely recommended, plus he cameos as one of the henchmen and cuts Jack Nicholson's nose.
Personal life? Google the news, eppadi patta tillalanggadinu puriyum.
Nerd....my worst fear. Anway...appidiyE maindain paNNuvOm. thodarndhu muyalvOm. Anderson gaali. Next Robert Bresson :lol2:
Is the nose rip real ? Seems very much so. I was slightly taken aback when I saw that. They show the face as it happens and blood squirt etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by groucho070
I suppose prosthetics was involved. Imagine if they can show shooting of a guys eye through spectacle (Godfather) then, then this is kid-s play for them. Either that or we have actual reason why Polanski ran away from USA.Quote:
Originally Posted by P_R
PR,
Uncharacteristic reading of the film, strictly rudimentary by your standards. I don't know if it's a bit of indifferent approach to watching the film or because this particular film requires multiple viewings, a much disappointed take on this film. :(
Thilak..trust me I am disappointed about my disappointment.
I was just sending a PM to equa. better to post here.
I will ignore a this is "just one reading bit. This reading seems to make all the difference. So it can be argued to be central to the movie experience. I am now not sure what alternative ways are there to liking this film. There sure would be 'additional' vignettes. Not denying that. But the core - I now feel - has to draw a lot from the appreciation of the Biblical parallel drawn.Quote:
Originally Posted by equanimus
I can imagine how thrilled I would have been to have figured that out when watching. Things would have fallen into place and the movie would have - in my evaluation - scaled great aesthetic heights.
It did not. Now I can react to that two ways:
a) I could say "I didn't watch with the attention it deserved."
But who am I kidding... :P
From Seinfeld
George: Why ??
Girl: It's not you it's me
George: Don't you say that to me...I invented that line
b) The movie didn't engage me enough.
This is 'fine' because it allows the 'each to his own' and people can live happily ever after.
Just that b doesn't go down well with someone like me with ambitions of gluttony.
<I am in a self-obsessive flow. So don't mind...>
The continuous misfire of 'masters of the medium' has me this close to giving up trying to watch great films (பாக்காட்டி போ..இந்த இழப்பை இந்தியா தாங்கிக்காதா).
நிறைய try பண்ணியாச்சு. நிறைய மாதிரி try பண்ணியாச்சு.
(consciously subtracting the anxiety of wanting to enjoy what I am watching etc.).
சில சமயம் அரிசியை கடிச்சு துப்புறோமோ 'ங்க்ற சந்தேகம் இருக்கத்தான் செய்யுது. ஆனா அதுக்காக என்ன பண்றது. இதெல்லாம் அப்பிடியே வரவேண்டியதாச்சே.
மக்களைக் கேட்டா.. "Don't give up, keep searching, you will find someone who speaks to you" அப்பிடின்னு எம்.டி.வி. லௌ டாக்டர் மாதிரி சொல்றாங்க :lol2:
என்னவோ போங்க...
Enna PR ippadi sollipteenga :(
[ella combination layum nadakkudhu. Majidi, Kubrick, Dark Knight, Bergman etc :lol: ]
Thanks for the link PR!
Welcome. Result of bewildered googling last night.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
I am actually curious to know if the film has been liked without this parallel.
Only in Kamal films that has been possible for me thus far.
எல்லாருக்கும் ஏதாவது வச்சிருப்பாப்ல. "Subtext பிடிபடலைனா straight அதலபாதாள ஏமாற்றம் தான்" அப்பிடிங்கிற பயம் இல்லாம படம் பார்க்கலாம். I guess I have been pampered.
I was reading back issues of a Tamil lit magazine which had an interview of director John Boorman. He said something to the effect that he was annoyed that "people were reluctant to place their ideas in a film. As if it was not a place for them to do so". Troublesome quote for me. ''உனக்கு என்ன தோணுதுன்னு
கேக்க இது என்ன inkblot test-A ?"[/url]