Dear Walrus,
Please, don't be serious... I also do not want any serous discussions (I am the one of the few guys who refused to attend the grand new year party given by my company).
This is just casual posting...becuase I have long holidays, nothing else to do except sitting at home alone....
When you refereed that in other threed, skeptcis didn't believe, I thought I can ask "Can you believe this?" thats all... Please don't think I am making any kind of challange here (in this thread..)!!! I will not make any arguement in this thread. I will be just a listener here...
Let me give more details about the reincarnation documentary aired in Discovery channel.
In that documentary, a reincarnation case about Thusitha, a girl from Sri lanka was reported in detail. This girl, born in 1981, described at about the age of three, how she had lived in a place called Kataragama (at a distance of 230 km from her village) where she drowned in a river. She stated that her father was a flower vendor and that one of her brothers could not speak. In Kataragama, the researchers Ian.Stevenson and Samararatne (1988) found a family of flower vendors that had a son that could not speak and a daughter that had drowned in a river in 1974. Of the 30 statements that Thusitha had made, only two turned out to be wrong, and three unverifiable. In other words, all the other 25 statements were right. The two families in question had never met at all and had never heard of each other. Dr. Ian Stevenson, who did the verification for discovery channel, is a former head of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Virginia, and presently Director of the Division of Personality Studies at the University of Virginia.
Sonu,Quote:
Originally Posted by sonu gopi
“Netrikan thirapinum….” Meaning… (it seems you haven’t seen the movie Thiru vilai adal)
This statement was made by a Sangam period tamil poet Nakiran when he made an argument on a subject, in which he contradicts with God. The god got angry with the irritating statements made by Nakiran and decided to burn him with the fire from his third eye. When the God opens his third eye, Nakiran understood the opponent is God but still he argue and say that you can be God, you can burn me with the fire but at this moment also I say that you are wrong. I also have similar questions and want to argue with God even if God burns me with fire… Don’t ask him whether I believe of not… but I am very much inspired with the Nakiran’s courage.