Printable View
padam pArkkala, so can't comment. But I don't think Complicateur is suggesting that the film is passable, but that even in such a bad film, there's some kind of "voice." If the argument is that Perarasu's films too have a distinct voice, I'd not disagree at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Plum
yeah, equa, I get that Compli is suggesting not that it is passable but some vision is there. And I say that is worse :-)
Enakku idhu therinjE aagaNum. Enna methodology use paNNi ipdi conculde pandreenga?
Yes. But is it his? It is a sort of borrowed voice. Not that there is anything wrong with it of course. I find Perarasu's honesty acceptable. He is one of the "ennAla ithu thAn mudiyum" people I mentioned in my earlier post. They aren't really an issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by equanimus
There isnt any methodology in specific. What I took away from Luck was "yEthO try paNNirukkAnga. pAvam execute paNNa mudiyala". The difference is when I watch some local movies I dont even feel like the director is trying. That is it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Plum
compli, inge dhaan konjam idikkudhu. Luck is so obviously an attempted indianisation of some hollywood movie(?) so obviously "edho try paNNi irukkAnga". How is that a vision?
How does it make it better than thirupachi?
I think this is where I somehow feel, sarNA has a point. I am all with you when you praise a Maqbool and even Dev D(though I couldnt appreciate it). But I dont think the averageg bolly movie has any great vision going for it - trying to replicate a DVD they saw, yes. Pointless rambling, yes. This is on the Luck types
I dont buy the Luck By Chances as well.
http://dailythanthi.com/article.asp?...sdate=9/9/2009
Mammootty concedes many things (in favor of TF)
1. TF gets huge sale val in KL
2. TF technically superior over other lang
3. MF getting less realistic while TF the other way around
avaraa sollala...they made his answer that way...Quote:
Originally Posted by app_engine
yes or no questions kekurainga interviewla :lol:
yes :xQuote:
Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
Ive heard abt the "gnana cherukku" of ammooty..it seems he is not humble like lal..
wht if he had answered "evan sonnadhu"
kekurainga paru kelviya....kooruketta kuppanuga
<Aside>
Plum,
I saw it in another thread also about your query on the 300th film of NR and Prabhu answering you there, like he has done it here. In actual terms it is very difficult to pinpoint the 300th movie because certain movies where he he had done guest roles are not included in the list in the chronlogical order whereas certain films have found place.
For eg, the film that you mentioned "Kuzhaindhaigal Kanda Kudiyarasu" and movies like Cinema Paithiyam, Natchathiram and Uruvangal Maralaam are not included in the chronlogical order whereas Thaye Unakkaaga and Dharthi are included.
But for calculation purposes they have zeroed on Once More as the 300th movie and logic is as Prabhu explained.
<end Aside>
Regards
PS: 1.Thanks Appu but the credit goes to Malayalam press who do a clinical job when it comes to such issues.
2. Vig, it is very sad that you pass on such comments about stalwarts without knowing the exact nature of them. Mammootty is one person who is so straightforward that he will not hesitate to call a spade a spade. He always speaks his mind and he will say it in the face even if the person happens to be the CM of Kerala. If such a nature is called as serukku, then it cannot be helped.
Murali sir,
Well,I was mentioning it in a positive tone...we say ilayaraja,kamal haasan has that "gnana serukku" or "vidhya garvam"
that was not to degrade them...aint it!
What I menat was mammooty is not a person who was known for being false "humbleness" or false "courtesy"