Quote:
Originally Posted by crajkumar_be
7. Yes, i also wonder why the Arundhatis dont talk about Kashmiri Pundits.
They do talk about Kashmiri Pundits. If they seem not to, it's because they don't think the Pundits' plight has any bearing on the question of whether Kashmiris have a right to "azadi". Here's a quote from Roy's Outlook article:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arundhati Roy
Those who wish to turn to the Quran for guidance will no doubt find guidance there. But what of those who do not wish to do that, or for whom the Quran does not make place? Do the Hindus of Jammu and other minorities also have the right to self-determination? Will the hundreds of thousands of Kashmiri Pandits living in exile, many of them in terrible poverty, have the right to return? Will they be paid reparations for the terrible losses they have suffered? Or will a free Kashmir do to its minorities what India has done to Kashmiris for 61 years? What will happen to homosexuals and adulterers and blasphemers? What of thieves and lafangas and writers who do not agree with the "complete social and moral code"?
(...)
However, none of these fears of what the future holds can justify the continued military occupation of a nation and a people. No more than the old colonial argument about how the natives were not ready for freedom justified the colonial project.
i.e., what's happened to the Kashmiri pundits is bad, and it is is one of the questions an independent Kashmir will have to resolve. But it cannot be an excuse to hold on to Kashmir.
Incidentally, the impression I get is that she believes Jagmohan is equally responsible for the exodus of Kashmiri Pundits, I'll have to search for where she said that and why.