RGV and GVM have a point to prove and settle scores. but RGV acting indifferently out of minds is nothing new to us. :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by thamiz
Printable View
RGV and GVM have a point to prove and settle scores. but RGV acting indifferently out of minds is nothing new to us. :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by thamiz
RGV is like what Chaaru is. Anyway, he may be right about I. Let us wait and see. Not sure why he is going against Rajini suddenly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who is Chaaru?
whats the score?Quote:
Originally Posted by leosimha
Nothing like that,RGV has this habbit of tweeting something which will garner attention...he has done many so in Past like commenting on Chiranjeevi,Hindi Gods,etc now shiftd to Current hot topicQuote:
Originally Posted by leosimha
New age porn story writer in tamil.Quote:
Originally Posted by leosimha
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is I trailer that impressive? It is like a collage of colorful images. Most part of it are from songs.
hardwork, dedication ellam pannikiraaru vikram. ippidi kochai paduthathinga broQuote:
Originally Posted by Saai
I don't understand why an artist would undergo that much stress for a Shankar movie. At the end of the day, it is going to be a very ordinary story, which has no strong charecterization, with no depth whatsoever. So far, there are only two charecters from a shankar's movie with flesh and blood. Both happened because of a terrific artist in Manorama - in Gentleman and Indian. yes, the movie can become a blokbuster. but there is no incentive for an actor to dive such depths in a shankar movie, by his current track record.Quote:
Originally Posted by paranitharan
I is touted to be a love story. Interestingly, shankar has not made a "single" good love scene in his movie. Not a single scene. Let alone directors like Mahendran, Balumahrendra, Maniratnam.There is not a single scene that matches with the magic of what pandiyarajan made in aan pavam when pandiyan mistakenly goes to seetha's home as a groom. All his love scenes has been so plastic. If I is a love story, sutham!!!!
true bro. Shankar and Vikram are made for each other. Show ponies. You will forget about their work a few days later. There is more to acting than putting on weight and looking weird.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saai
I movie is about love betrayal revenge...watch it...another magnum epic by Shankar :-)
which was the previous one?Quote:
Originally Posted by leosimha
The last magnum opus from Shankar factory was nanban unfortunately a remake of Hindi 3 idiots. I am watching anniyan as I am replying here; guess I has some similarities with anniyan..hope not but am guessing imagination....Quote:
Originally Posted by Saai
As long as Shankar's 'I' does what it should, everyone(?) will be happy....
It looks like 'I' already started doing what it is supposed to do! :D
well said Saai.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saai
அந்நியன் அம்பி, சியான், சித்தன், ஆறுச்சாமி போன்ற பாத்திரங்கள் நினைவில் நிற்பவை என நினைக்கிறென். மற்றபடி ஷங்கரின் நீர்த்துபோன படைப்பாற்றல் மீதான விமர்சனத்தில் சாய் மற்றும் உங்களோடு ஒத்துப் போகிறேன். ஜென்டில்மேன் பிளாஷ்பேக் கொடுத்த எதிர்பார்ப்புகளை அதற்கு அடுத்துவந்த எந்தப் படத்திலும் ஈடுகொடுக்க முடியல. ஜீன்ஸ் படத்திலும் பிளாஷ்பேக் நன்றாக வந்திருக்கும். மற்றபடி, பிரமாண்டங்களை அகற்றிவிட்டு பார்த்தால் ஷங்கர் காலிப் பெருங்காய டப்பாதான்.Quote:
Originally Posted by paranitharan
:shaking: jai hind movie director was Shankar in which action king arjun was the hero? Oh I didn't know this.
oops, I meant to say gentleman. Corrected it :)Quote:
Originally Posted by leosimha
Enthiran was good. However, I like Indian very much. I can watch it anytime for the old man
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ambi aarusaamy sithan right wokayQuote:
Originally Posted by venkkiram
RGV's half-baked statements are not going to help I. They are going to indirectly hurt I opening. Shankar and Rajni have respects for each other. This moron's statement is annoying to everybody! Why cant his big twitter-mouth shut! I guess he is a big loser these days! All he does is writing some nonsense in twitter!
now thats the symbol of a humble person ! :clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by balaajee
Below is a close-up still from movie I, the other Vikram. I am aware some don't want to see it, its for others :
Spoiler:
This explains why "I" was given U/A certificate.
-deleted with warning-
-deleted with warning-
-deleted with warning-
-deleted with warning-
'I' Hindi Audio Launch Stills
http://www.chiyaanvikramfans.in/2015...ch-stills.html
'Bigg Boss 8': Vikram Promotes 'I', Makes Salman Khan Speak in Tamil
Vikram promoted his forthcoming film "I" on reality TV show "Bigg Boss 8". While the Kollywood star preferred to speak in English, he made Salman Khan speak in Tamil.
http://data1.ibtimes.co.in/en/full/5...han-vikram.jpg
A photo from Vikram's special "I" promotional episode on "Bigg Boss 8".IB Times IndiaA photo from Vikram's special "I" promotional episode on "Bigg Boss 8".IB Times India
Chiyaan's special episode was aired on Monday, 29 December and Salman introduced the "Anniyan" star to the audience by heaping praises on the movie and its quality.
Salman wondered how Vikram manages to look different every time he meets him. It is a known fact that the Tamil star keeps changing his physique every now and then for his films.
Responding to Salman's comment, Vikram jovially said that his wife keeps telling him: "Look at Salman, why can't u become like him!" Chiyaan added that he loves Salman's confidence and attitude.
Vikram compared Salman to Rajinikanth and said that both the stars rise above their scripts. Adding to the fun, Chiyaan even made Salman mouth a few words in Tamil.
This eventually became a debating topic among Tamil cine-goers on social media and his fans praised the actor for the same. Later, Salman claimed that he has seen the promos of the film and he is highly impressed.
Upen Patel, one of the contestants of "Bigg Boss 8", also has a role in "I". The movie will release worldwide on 14 January in Tamil, Telugu and Hindi languages.
"I", which has Amy Jackson in the female lead role, is made with a huge budget and is produced by Aascar Ravichandran. The movie is directed by Shankar. The audio of the Hindi version of the movie has been released on 30 December.
I am not able to see the pic. Is it deleted?Quote:
Originally Posted by mappi
No, the picture is still present, maybe the site is restricted for you. I have sent another link thru private message, check PM and let me know.
Thanks Maapi. I am unable to view it because it is restricted, as you guessed. Will see it after I get home and let you know.
Really scary and disgusting. The hard work of Vikram shouldn't go wastage from here. Hope the story is as gripping and the direction, screenplay to be top notch by Shankar.Quote:
Originally Posted by mappi
Saw it. Thanks! Not sure whether they will get a U......
This is what I also mentioned some days back. Hopefully this image won't stay in the movie for longer duration and no close-up shots.Quote:
Originally Posted by leosimha
Its too early for me to talk much about anything related to the movie "I", keeping in mind not to judge a book by its cover. Everyone puts hardwork in one way or the other - so a hardwork alone is not the button pusher here. In whichever way you look at, the script is what thats going to win. How the script is adapted as a play for the screen is what really matters, be it about ugliness or beauty. To explain this, I take 3 exemples, strictly not on a comparitive note :
1/ The Paris Bell Ringer & the gypsy spy
The Quasimodo story became a hit in whichever format it was published. The gruesome attire of Quasimodo is what lifted the story. Plus, it was well coupled with interesting subplots, that by the end Quasimodo becomes the hero. You forget his appearence but go with his beauty at heart. Thats what was acheived by 'The Hunchback of Notre-Dame'. You also have Dracula & Frankestein (Orginal Version), where at a point of time the ugliness becomes just a screen and what you take back beyond is emotion.
2/ Animal Kingdom - Australian Movie
The film does not have any abnormal makeups, but its about ugly people. You follow a crime family, and somewhere inbetween you start feeling for the bad ones and detesting the worst ones. Purely is not about morals, its basically the experience you get that is induced in the script and transformed into a play.
3/ Alavandhan
The fierce Nandu has always been my exemple of an extraordinary character. He is the snake. And the final episodes, it was filmed in such a way that he can jump out from the screen - he is really scary. But the emotional quoitient is completely lost. The script failed to take into consideration to register anything, positive or negative, about Nandu and the general experience you get is just like coming out of a circus. Eventhough it had some base elements to justify certain aspects in the film, the script did not have enough space to accomodate the interaction between the audience and Nandu, thus the screenplay lacked to establish it.
So, you see, it all about how the character is potrayed and utilised. Sub plots are very important that can get the core of the character out. Shankar should have done something with this other Vikram character for us all to cheerish, but it can be other wise too. That's why I cannot say anything more about these pictures which are increasing my curiosity, but I have to see the film to see what beauty Shankar wants to speak about.