Only hope Chennaistan next ban is not on Australian players :lol2:
sare sare continue..
Printable View
Murali wouldn't have been a problem at all for CSK. They have played him very well in the past, may be because they played him more in the nets for the first 3 years. And he is not menacing these days. Check his performance this season.
Could have!! would have!
Well a top class spinner to struggling batsmen in middle would have made a difference. Having all out pace attack during 15-18th over changed the game.
I am sure CSK fans will have good justifications for Delhi Daredevils and Mumbai Indians as well.
I am still in shock, how on earth they allowed Chennai(TN) to impose some f*@#ed ban in Republic of India and people in TN feel its the rite thing to do in sports?? Shame on them.
CSK won all their home games in 2011 when all the SL players played here in Chennai. Similarly MI this season won against CSK without the services of Malinga. So the contribution of SL players for win/loss is negligible to say the least. There are no impact players like a Gayle or Warner from SL this moment. Mahela may be an exception but not in the same ranks of the players mentioned above.
And the ban on SL players is only for their own good. Especially when the impact of hunger strike of students among general public was huge. And the franchise owner will not risk the team's image to take a hit by playing SL players, whether at home or away.
1) Its a shame we can't guarantee safety for someone in our country (just a reminder TN is part of India Still).
2) If they truly have such huge sentimental wave ! Stop broadcasting all matches which has SL players in TN. Why not extend the Ban?
Whatever man ! Rational thinking is out of the picture. Let me see how many more seasons this drama will continue.
Gemini TV have a chase on their hands tonite.
Gounders one :lol:
:rotfl:
Royals on top now ...