The only big problem I see with the film is the tonal change in the gaudy denouement, apart from which, I thoroughly enjoy watching it.
Printable View
The only big problem I see with the film is the tonal change in the gaudy denouement, apart from which, I thoroughly enjoy watching it.
I felt Ramesh Aravind was the weakest link in the film. Another thing that brought the film down is Kamal-Manisha relationship. Could have been handled better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
:exactly: Avinasi is his best role after Virumaandi :yes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
:huh: Press F1Quote:
Originally Posted by kid-glove
அதாவது tonal change தெளிவா புரிஞ்சிருச்சு 'ன்றீங்க.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
Momento madhiri.. kadaisilirundhu varuvOm
The conclusion was set up with exuberant carnival tone, felt out-of-place to the relative laid-back style until that point, which it managed to achieve in spite of farcical twists.
Ah yeah I remember now. That was not the most important praavlum. As B(K) put it: the conspicous absence of a rug was felt.
The rug was peed over, and made out a farce. All while presenting it in a jazzy laid-back style.
அது ஒரு கருத்துQuote:
Originally Posted by kid-glove