World Cricket II

Ulaga nadippu continues. If you want how the veto was used, cricket history has enough tales. I am not going to educate you. The very fact that they created a veto should tell you something? No? AF invoked Godwin's law let me extend it in 1945, you'd have said "do we have enough evidence on conc camos? Oru latycham pEru saagattum appuRam action edukkalaam.. Again a very distinct sothula poosanikkai maRaikkum Ebglish behaviour.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ajithfederer

What the devil that has got to do with the discussion here? :banghead:


Of course you wouldn't.



Australia kaaran Odhaipaan :lol2:
No sir. They are NOT. Commonwealth-nnu irundhaalum they are seperate COUNTRIES.

---

my 2 paise...
england and wales are eli and poonai... most welsh ppl does not support the england team ina match...

Michael Clarke ku 4 wicket kudutha mundakalapa west indies ku :clap: :clap: :hammer:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ajithfederer

Collingwood eellam exceptional cases-nga. Talk about the rule(normal scenario) here. India-la kooda than Raina, Kohli etc are good fielders. Adhukaaga all Indians are good fielders eh?? :huh:

---

Who ever said all England are good fielders.
You said Eng have upped their fielding skills by importing fielders. i.e. something from the outside 'locals' can imbibe.
I don't see a convincing case of that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ajithfederer

Whole world knows an Indigenous England side is a good for nothing side

---

Thorpe, Stewart, Lamb, Botham, Gooch, Goughie - ivaingaLai ellAm good-for-nothing-nu sonneengannA naan enna seyya mudiyin.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by =ajithfederer

Ulloorla irukaradhu peru than talent pool. Velinaatula irukaradhu talent pool Allaa.

---

Rejeetted. I invoked America, neenga suvaththula muttikkitteenga.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ajithfederer

It will look odd.

It is not like the old times(0f 80's and 90's). Every thing is being scrutinized and talked about.

---

What is being odd, got to do with scrutiny Feddy?
If someone born in Dorset plays for Australia, nothing is odd. This kind of thing happens all the time outside cricket.
Whereas if he plays for India, it would be odd.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wizzy

P_R Khadoos-ness isn't limited to mattai/kattai podrathu :lol: it extends to being a clutch player/scoring daddy 100s/to be a batsman for all seasons..

---

Khadoos is IIUC about no-quarter-given style. They had someone or the other kicking in. Batsmen for all seasons - yes it's taken a while to come. In the last couple of years do you think the difference between KP/Trott and MaNi/Cook is a whole lot?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wizzy

not to be perturbed by kin/kith vallakappu/kadhu kutthu/depression et all..

---

This has nothing to do with anything.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wizzy

for all their doggedness Nass/Thorpe couldn't convert those into numbers and Trott/KP have succeeded in this regard which is very un-English is my opinion.

---

I don't think it is un-English. But one qn for you, as much as someone who thinks it is un-English, do you think it is SAfrican. yaaru prototype? Amala, Kallis, McKenzie-A?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

Ulaga nadippu continues.

---

Refusal to back-up loose allegation that Ireland is ready for test cricket and Eng is suppressing them continues.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

If you want how the veto was used, cricket history has enough tales. I am not going to educate you.

---

ezhudha sOmbalA irundhA, link edhunA kudunga. nEthulErndhu...cricket, ECB, veto-nu google paNNittu irukkEn.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

The very fact that they created a veto should tell you something? No?

---

India Security Council permanent membership, range-A?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

Oru latycham pEru saagattum appuRam action edukkalaam.. Again a very distinct sothula poosanikkai maRaikkum Ebglish behaviour.

---

solradhukku edhunA irundhA sollunga. summA Nazi, racism sollittE irukkeengaLE thaviRa, oNNumE varaliyE. veRum kAththu dhaan'nga varudhu.

England support paNNAdhavan kooda, Plum kitta anju nimisham pEsinA pOdhum :lol2:

Quote:

---

Khadoos is IIUC about no-quarter-given style. They had someone or the other kicking in. Batsmen for all seasons - yes it's taken a while to come. In the last couple of years do you think the difference between KP/Trott and MaNi/Cook is a whole lot?

---

imo Nohit/ATG are the antithesis for the Khadoos-ness so I take it as whatever they aren't :lol2: Cook has so many of those low troughs in batting to be bracketed to this..Mani is always seen as a guy who gets those soft runs/joining the chorus/sharing the limelight after the job is done by others.

Quote:

---

This has nothing to do with anything.

---

athu my needle at soft English cricketers in Tresco/Vaughn/Flintoff who promised a lot but delivered less thanks to their uttar pradesh.

Quote:

---

I don't think it is un-English. But one qn for you, as much as someone who thinks it is un-English, do you think it is SAfrican. yaaru prototype? Amala, Kallis, McKenzie-A?

---

Mckenzie/Grame Smith went to the same school so you could map their untidiness in batting style to that..Amala <=> Trott..both didn't have a competent offside play when they started and their technique is based on tiring the bowlers out and making them bowl to their strength.

The problem is your weird "tradition" reasoning. It is just diverting of the issue. It is from the very British template of diverting the plane of the argument to gain a foothold. Must say you outdid your masters there - even they haven't resorted to such specious reasoning.

ThozhargaLE, here's a conversation from the 19th century:
Scene: one day in Thosar, Rajasthan, in 19th century: :
raja ram mohan roy : pommannaattiya udankattai ERa solRadhu nallallai. NEkku manasu thAngAdhu kEttELA,

Ram Prabhu Menaria, Village chief : dhE, idhellAm enga oorla sarva sAdhAraNAm. KaNdukkAma pOviyA? NeekEnti abbayi? Idhu unga oorA?

RRM Roy apdiyellAm solla padAdhu, enna dhaan pArambariyamnAlum nyaayam dharmam manidhAbimAnam ellAm oNNu irukkungaLE?

PR Menaria adhellAm engaLukku theriyAdhu. Naanga pala varushamA ipdi thAn paNdrom. Nee yaaru kekkaRadhukku?

RRM Roy: EnglandlalAm ipdi illeenga....
PRM: dei adhu avanga kalchardA! IngE poNNu udankattai ERinA evlo naturalA irukku pAkka? IdhuvE veLLakAri gown pOttukittu udankattai ERinA pAkka kaNdrAviyA irukkAdhu?

***RRM Roy jumps into the pyre himself. 20th century governments urgently order revision of history textbooks***