World Cricket II

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

No, you clearly are refusing to acknowledge a valid point. Ia m not going to leave you just like that - first be honest - then we can call truces.

---

naanum thaayaaru.

Quote:

---

Sewnarines, Ragoonaths

---

infact, good idea. Ravi Rampaul is struggling to nail down a place in the Windies XI - thanks to Darren Saamynaadhan being a captain and an automatic choice.


WIZZY _ kaamaaan, get me Seenu maama's mail-id please. This seems too good an idea to not implement. avaru test cricketlAm kavalai pada mAttArungaRIngaLA? ada, CSK-ku oru indian fast bowler kedaippAnnu dhoobam pOdalAm. kamaanyA, ivLO argue paNNadhula, feeyarE namakku oru nalla practical idea koduthirukkAr.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

Why are you misrepresenting?

---

19th century-la naan oppressionai adharippEnnu sollittu, ennaiyA misrepresent 'ngreenga. :lol2:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

My point is against your arbitrary definition of "natural" immigration. It exists nowhere but your mind - not even the ingenious Englishmen who fruit-eating-seed-throwers in such obfuscation have thought of your (admittedly) pre-emptive strike.

---

oru arbitrary-yum illai. History-ai paarunga. Who has come to India for work? 'Let this be a start' 'ngreenga. No 'ngREn. That is all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

Your adamancy in the face of logic is commendably English.

---

neenga solradhu dhaan logic
adhai oththukkalainnA English-nu thittuveenga

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

You keep protesting that I call you Englishman of India - well, you have every quality to be called an Englishman. So, even if you protest that you are supporting Test Cricket not British monarchy, you have exhibited sufficient mule-headed fancy (il)logic with arbitary definitions of concepts to suit your current position.

---

Oh Englishman was shorthand for this-A? Then fine.
But adhu makkaLukku puriyAdhillaiyA. avunga ennai yEdhO anglophile-nu thappA ninaichchuttA. adhukku dhaan theLivupaduththuREn.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

Evne the stand that you keep flaunting as "munnamEyE sollittEn" is cleraly a well-thought out pre-emptive defence - which is a very English trait.

---

I don't know if it is an exclusively English trait. You think it is a 'bad' thing and thus like to call it English. That's all.
But I need to keep reminding you because you ask the questions which I have already answered, seek acknowledgement for something I have already acknowledged.
padikkAma pEsureengaLonnu oru davuttu.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

You shouldnt feel insulted to be called as one with English attributes, should you?

---

Again, a mischeivous suggestion.
This suggests that I would happy to be associated with all English attributes, even 'bad' ones - when I have been crying hoarse in protestation, which Plum pretends to acknowledge. So you have got it in your head that there is a heavy dose of aspirational Anglophilia in all this. Else you will NOT be making such a statement.

[QUOTE=Plum;855292]What kind of idiotic argument is this? If an Englishman has to qualify for India, he has to stay in India 183 days for 4 consecutive years. That's what the ICC requires - ofcourse, they'll relax it for themselves but surely when they see reverse-brain=drain, they'll uphold this law to the word - which means if an Englishman qualifies per ICC requirements for India, he'd have soaked India in him sufficiently. That should be enough, Ofcourse, except in your mind - which is just your personal idiosyncracy. I have my own idiosyncrasies - atleast, i dont argue that those idiosyncratic beliefs are "national character" or "natural trait".

Quote:

---

Mark Tully is an odd case working in India - before and after him, no British journalist has made India his home. Per your logic, he should never have been allowed to stay on in India and make India his home.

---

You are clearly NOT reading ANYTHING I am writing. I have no prob with Tullys and Dalrymples. India for Indians-nu sonna maadhiri solreenga?? I made the most extreme case that I am fine with Sonia becoming the PM of India - something that'll make a good part of the nation foam in the mouth. I just don't want to see a veLLaikkaara mercenary open the Indian attack. Of course there will be exceptions (been in India since I was a kid etc.) but as a rule, going out and hiring the gen-next from SA,Aus is not something India should do, just because Aus/NZ/Eng do it. They are different, they have people flitting across borders always. It will be novel for us.

It's about time we also did -nu ninaikkureenga pOla. I don't think so.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plum

Reviving the Dr Vijay analogy, I dont like Vijay movies, I wish a flop for him every time he releases a movie but if a DMK government resorted to unfair means to prevent release of his movie, my sympthies would be with him. I wouldnt crow and celebrtate that releasing a Vijay movie was prevented evne if by unfair means.

That is how it should be - infact, I believe you are also fair enough in that manner. It is just that you are resorting to vidhandavaadham in this issue and are unwilling to back off.

---

I answered this already (ippadi sonnA vERa ungaLukku kOvam vandhurudhu). You are more democratic and tolerant than I am in certain things. When something painfully ugly and egregious happening will have me cheer when something is done to prevent it.

Members of parliament are banned from playing T20-nu BJP oru arbitrary rule koNdu vandhA, aduththa election avaingaLukku kooda vote pOduvEn :lol2:

Does your logic apply to this forum? enna dakalti vENA paNNi enakku pidikkAdha vishayangaL indha forumla nadakkAdha mAdhiri paNNalAmA? unga kattupAttula irukkaRA indha kOttaila, nAnga enga convenience, enga beliefskERpa ellai meeralamA? ada, assume it suits your preferencesnyu vechukkunga - appO naan enna dakalti vENA paNNAlAma indha forumla?

puriyAdhavanaLaukku - suppose some dakalti I do in this forum suits Feeyar's belief and suits his vision of things, will he turn a blind eye to my dakalti, naadhari velais here? (romba sootchumamA kEkkaREn, yOsichu badhil sollunga)
oru vAtti commit paNNittIngnnA, nAn roadu pOtturuven

ellaam saaljaappu. You have just obfuscated - you havent answered.

P_R unga colour matching theory is devoid of any logic and Robin Singh was a Trini who happen to play for TN/India..avaru ok-na Rampaul ok thane

Plum. naan yenna mail id vechikinna vanjagam pandraen :lol:..pliss to dial-Satish for these delikate matters

Quote:

---

India - something that'll make a good part of the nation foam in the mouth. I just don't want to see a veLLaikkaara mercenary open the Indian attack. Of course there will be exceptions (been in India since I was a kid etc.) but as a rule, going out and hiring the gen-next from SA,Aus is not something India should do, just because Aus/NZ/Eng do it. They are different, they have people flitting across borders always. It will be novel for us.

---

indha dakalti dhAnE vENAmgaRadhu, idhukku dhAN ding example sonNEn. You are defining what is natural and what is not natural for a subsection of people. DINGsum adhE dhAn senjAnga - presuming on behalf of the natural order. You cleverly misrepresented my position and issued an hollow rebuttal of a point I didnt make....


You stop misrepresenting first - appuRam I will stop

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wizzy

P_R unga colour matching theory is devoid of any logic and Robin Singh was a Trini who happen to play for TN/India..avaru ok-na Rampaul ok thane

Plum. naan yenna mail id vechikinna vanjagam pandraen :lol:..pliss to dial-Satish for these delikate matters

---

Robin Singh came when he was a kid it seems :lol: - I am 100% sure he made that knowing fully well that it is not the case. I am 100% sure that he just made it up as he goes just becuase it seemed like a good rebuttal :rotfl:

yOv wizzy - TNCA circlesla neRaiya influence irukkumE umakku? illaiyA?

SatissharE - nIngaLavadhu konjam help paNNunga. Indian cricket-ai thala keezha puratti pOttudalAm.