+2
definitely :rotfl3:
92.7 BIG FM's BEST OF TAKE IT EASY WITH BALAJI - TAMIL CINEMA - JAN MUDHAL JUNE VARAI !!!!
http://soundcloud.com/balajipatturaj...best-of-take-8
Villain.
Finally. Good entertainment. Ajith was good in both roles.
:smile: vanthA, chess vilayattukku koopiduvEn. (or a game of gin rummy ala Konigsberg's short story).
aftrAll K.S. Ravikumar padam, remba serious-A treat pannapdAthu...
eesan...
angangE konjam thoyvu irundhAlum, nice masAlA!
I'm wondering how it would have turned out if Sasikumar himself played the Sangaiah role...
Pass marks, without question!
eesan...
viralai vidu, vAndhi varum
:rotfl:
+1 for Vivek.
Vivek asks :"evvlo poda pora" to a man in a bank and that guy replies"noothi oru rooba sir" ...
Vivek : Enna bank-ku moi vaikka poriya :lol:
He asks Dhanush
Vivek: "Enna padichirukka?"
Dhanush :"Needhi, Nerma..."
Vivek :"Yen! Sathyam, Dharmam ellam arrears vachrukia?" :rotfl: :thumbsup:
The way he turns casual after getting back the lost money from Dhanush was super.
I think eesan was commercially a flop. The major mistake by Sasikumar was "not using familiar faces" on-screen for a masAlA.
His earlier movies (Subramanyapuram as director / nAdOdikaL as producer) didn't need familiar faces because both had some novelty in the storyline (i.e. to TF watchers) and not just the presentation layer.
OTOH, eesan has nothing new in the storyline (age old pazhivAngal business), though the presentation layer is slightly different from the standard masAlA template.
Being a revenge masAlA, the movie could have been a big hit if Sasikumar used stars who are familiar to the masses. Even his face has become familiar (post subramaniapuram / nadOdikaL) and that's why I wondered how it would have fared had he done the cop role.