Intha gumbalai ellaam kadathi koottittu poi, 80sla vantha "pallu veLaukkura" art film pottu kaattaNum. Ulagatharam baainga :banghead:
Intha gumbalai ellaam kadathi koottittu poi, 80sla vantha "pallu veLaukkura" art film pottu kaattaNum. Ulagatharam baainga :banghead:
"masala-naalum oru nyAya dharmam vENdAmA" 'nRadhu admissible question 'ngREn.Quote:
Originally Posted by ajithfederer
Naan E was decidedly outrageous in concept and executed well, which makes it palatable. This cannot simply be extended to say every sloppily made film, hiding under the pretext of being a 'masala' and demanding it be cut some slack, should be equally liked. That's all milord.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajithfederer
Nothing too particular.
But I was interested in knowing whether Rajamouli gaaru had seen it. The fly hatching out as a prelude to BB's bottle episode (best of all time?) 'The Fly', and the whole mechanics of Fly vs Walt in the episode, the setups, like a one act play in one set-up, I initially thought it was not CG. But it is..
http://www.fxguide.com/featured/Breaking_Bad_Entity_FX/
Mighty impressive. Actually I like the fact that in BB, there's no silly closeups of Fly's mass pose, dancing etc (rubbing of Tarsus after Walt's fall, the only exception). The initial parts of Fly hatching out is not CG (in Walt's place? The first and last shot are from his room.)
It's impressive to do this in Television.
Coming to Naan-E, I don't think it's as simple as people make out. To make a series of set-up's work purely on the psychology plane was impressive. Sudeep was impressive. The threat of the Fly seemed very real, with combination of shot-making and his acting. It is make-believe. But it was mostly make-believe without slapstick nonsense. To add CG Fly later in to the frame, would mean they had specifically storyboarded it. There's a vision and imagination in most of the shots. It's praiseworthy to my mind.
idhai romba naaLaa romba pEr sollittu irukkAn...last and finalA idhai pEsi theeththuraNum.Quote:
Originally Posted by sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar
pallu viLakkura art film thamizh-la edhu..sollunga. Talk me. Talk. Talk.
The point is, everyone likes well made entertainers. But terrible, sloppy films trying to use being 'entertainers' as an excuse for being sloppy, needs to be called out. Every time.
michcha nadiharhaL paththi vENdAm.
Dasa is a sloppy film. VV is a big bore.
idhai sonnA udanE Mahanadhi dhaan pudikkum, pretentious-nu kaththappadaadhu.
Aboorva SagodargaL ellAm pArkkAma kaNNai moodikkittOmA enna?
Feddy, Flu,
He'd be here in US timings. The guy's a thoroughbred Yank.
that pallu velakkura padam is Veedu, i think, Baalumahendra film. pallu velakking shown for few minits non stop, closeup (thats the shot, paste closeup aa kObaal palpodiyaa theriyala)
ungalukku ee pudiche aaganumnu avasiyam illa. pidichirukku nnu rasikkiravangalai yen kurai solreenga?!? It has(to an extent) bounced the recent film which got great obening.
Naanga, antha imagination ai, creativity ai rasikkirom. enna thappu?!? Ellaathukkum Abbusago va kondu vanthu compare panni, pass panninaa thaan ullaara viduveengaLaa?!?
Hey Sakku, P_R liked EEEEE man..
OTOH KG2 :lol2: 'Find him, Kill him'
Quote:
Originally Posted by P_R
nEthu thaan Docter ai meet panninen. ugalukku 80s padamlaam vONaam. avarta aafanavar vittaa pothum.
Enakku Mahanadhiyum pudikkum, Dasa, VV, Naan EE ithugaLum pidikkum. of course ellaam ore type vehicle illa, athu vera. ithu enna maathiriyaana rasanai nnu neengaLe mudivu pannikkonga.
Sahala, I like ee very much yA.
Selva, ee pudicchchA, podhuvA masalakkaL pudikkaNumnu conditionA sonnAr (nu purinjikittEn. I may have misunderstood, indha debate-Oda history thellEdhu). adhai thaan edhirththEn. I consider most of the so called masala films just an excuse to make terrible films.
As I have written earlier, even the much celebrated Ghilli, Ko, Dhool and all are quite ho-hum.
Ayan - exland. udanE Surya padam 'nRadhaala solRadhA sollappadaadhu :notthatway:
Adhavan-laam kaalakkodumai. TV-la pOttappOvE pAkka sahikkalai.