already, there is a lot of people here to point out the positives of ARR.. so only i am bringing out the negative side of him.. Cover-up panna yaaravathu try pannaa, naan vanthu matter-a open pannuven.. :PQuote:
Originally Posted by thineshan54321
Printable View
already, there is a lot of people here to point out the positives of ARR.. so only i am bringing out the negative side of him.. Cover-up panna yaaravathu try pannaa, naan vanthu matter-a open pannuven.. :PQuote:
Originally Posted by thineshan54321
But you must remember there are also more negative sides with kamal and ilayaraja. 8-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Devar Magan
please see their respective threads.. we are discussing that too..Quote:
Originally Posted by prasana84
At times, kamal's -ves are discussed in ARR section too (If I am not wrong) :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Devar Magan
in the same length as Ajith fans discuss abt Bala's -ves and IR's fans discuss abt Mani's -ves in their threads........its all natural....infact i wud call ARR fans as most subdued in showing their dissent....... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by selvakumar
but i still wud like to see discussions abt ARR and his music/films only here........bcos, many ppl. satisfy their long burning ARR hatred by bashing ARR under the pretext that some ARR fans spoke negatively abt kamal......
Yes Maddy. You are quite right reg the highlighted.Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
I disagree with the later part though :)
yeah, u r right........2 wrongs dont make one right :D .....bashing kamal here is unneccessary and is out of context........but if someone discusses abt kamal here, they are not neccesarily ARR fans always or they do it out of ARR fanatism........the last arguement on kamal we had here had nuthing to do with ARR fanatism........but u never seem to spare a chance to police ARR fans.......i dont think if u say the truth 100 times it doesnt bcome all the more correctQuote:
Originally Posted by selvakumar
Yes. Maddy. Those two wrongs doesn't make this one right. Most of the time, kamal will be brought whether it is within the context (films) or out of context (anything not related to films). Again, everyone has the right to discuss on films since it will be their MD who is going to work with him.Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
Yes, It has nothing to do with fanatism. Only thing is that, fanatism triggered it and remained silent. I never police people. There are many 'chosen' ones here for those jobs. I just pointed out that even kamal -ves were discussed in this section without restricting them to TF section aloneQuote:
the last arguement on kamal we had here had nuthing to do with ARR fanatism........but u never seem to spare a moment to police ARR fans.......
if i remember correctly, the arguement started betn thilak and RS or someone - no way it was related to ARR fans.........pala mugam sulikkum sambavangal vaarthaigal koora pattullana, aanal, adhai marupadiyum, maupadiyum kilara vendaame :D .......also that doesent give license for ppl. to come here unneccessarily and talk crap here......... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by selvakumar
Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
:o I thought I didn't brought them once again. I just said that even kamal was not spared in this section and his -ves were also analysed. When kamal's -ves can be discussed in Arr section, then why not the same can't be done for ARR in his section. Even if it a crap comment, Arr fans can post against the craps just like kamal fans once did in this section. Am I right ?
Quote:
.
Sure. It doesn't give license. It is just that many discuss on other areas as wellQuote:
......also that doesent give license for ppl. to come here unneccessarily and talk crap here......... :D