Progressive thoughts? :huh:
Printable View
Progressive thoughts? :huh:
Thanks to the "OPEN MINDS" they are able to digest ANYTHING pro or against culture. Not much diff in language of communication. Content varies though :D
"Oh dont judge the book by its cover" :lol2:
Sorry, I didn't get the joke... :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by joe
இது மாதிரி ஒரு மொக்கை கட்டுரையை படிக்கிறதால பொறுமை வளரும் .அது ஜனநாயகத்துக்கு நல்லது -ங்குறாரு 8-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kambar_Kannagi
அவரை விடுவோம். நீங்களும் அதனை 'மொக்கை' கட்டுரை என்குறீர்களா??? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by joe
The author is intentionally missing the point. He sees the courts' limited role and still expects courts to be the pronouncers of morality !Quote:
Originally Posted by Kambar_Kannagi
To paraphrase the exact sentence : "Just because something is not illegal does not mean people can do whatever they want. Or atleast such a notion should not be propogated". Whose job is that ? The courts ?
Then he proceeds to launch on all the all too familiar attack on Khushboo's locus standi to make such observations. (as if it will make a difference if the statement were made by a erudite social scientist who is the epitome of virtue !).
What exactly did you expect the court to have done in this case ?
If we really think the law should pronounce moral diktats, then we should strongly support the Taliban regime. They were enforcing morality and fighting western decadence. i.e. it was not left to the people to choose with their best judegment and institutions like the family acting as natural checks for guidance. Instead they said : "certain things are sacred and set in stone, they never ever change with time, we will lose our identity, so we have to be firm and enforce with a iron first. Pretty much put into the minds of the people the fear of transgression. Stoning of women who falter from their roles as kudumba kuthuviLakkus would be perfectly understandable. Honor killing of adulterous women who tarnish the institution of 'family' and promote debasement of values, should be welcomed wholehearrtedly. After all they all mean well. They wanted to protect institutions as we have known them all along, to remain unchanged.
This debate is not about whether something is right-or-wrong. It is about what should be dictated by law ? Where do we draw a line ?
Infact , ’மொக்கை’ -ன்னு அவர் சொல்லல .நானே உரிமையா சேர்த்துகிட்டது தான் . :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kambar_Kannagi
:exactly:Quote:
Originally Posted by P_R
எல்லா சட்டங்களும் தனிமனித ஒழுக்க நெறியிலும் அடங்கும் .ஆனால் எல்லா தனிமனித ஒழுக்க நெறிகளும் சட்டத்தினுள் அடங்க வேண்டுமென்ற அவசியம் இல்லை.
PR :thumbsup:
idhukku mela thelivaa inimEl solla mudiyaadhu
P_R and Joe - fair enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by joe
இந்த விசயத்தில் 'அது ஒரு கருத்து' என்ற பட்சத்தில் நீதிமன்றம் அந்த நடிகையை விட்டுவிட்டது.
அதுவே, குஷ்புவின் 'கருத்து' சமுதாயத்தில் கடுகளவு தாக்கத்தையாவது ஏற்படுத்துமானால், அது தவறல்லவோ...
இப்போ, சினிமாவில் புகைபிடிக்கும் காட்சி தவிர்க்கப் பட வேண்டும் என்று கோஷம் போடுகிறார்களே, அது போல ஆகிவிட்டது இதுவும்...