@plum naanga justify panlingo,neenga solra kuttrasaattra naanga defend pandrom.adhukku kooda indha ulagathula urimai illaiya,ennamo naanga kolai kuttram senjamaadhiri solreenga.
Printable View
@plum naanga justify panlingo,neenga solra kuttrasaattra naanga defend pandrom.adhukku kooda indha ulagathula urimai illaiya,ennamo naanga kolai kuttram senjamaadhiri solreenga.
Long before he became a star, MGR was active in politics as a Congress member till '53. And after he became a star he joined the DMK and had participated in various rallies and demonstrations for the cause of the people. Then he went on to start his party the ADMK and eventually became CM.
And also he did not enter politics for silly reasons like his films were not allowed to be screened by the ruling establishment.
So there is a huge difference between the two, that even comparison is an atrocity.
Answer the second part - tamizh makkaL nalanukkAga dhAnE ArambichAr? Futurela CM AgaNumnu Asai irukkulla? (ofcourse Vijay eppO idhai en kitta sonNArnu coutner paNNalAm - sila vishayangaLai maRaikka mudiyAdhu - idhu illainu nInga pretend paNNinA :shakehands:). Sari ok, giving the benefit of doubt, nALaikku ivar business interests affect Agadha issuekku kural kuduthA appO ivarOda agenda/self-interests/pretence-ai othukkuvIngaLA? Will he remain silent on political issues in future for all issues? apdi nadandhA tamizhnAdu thappichudhu!
@punnaimaran, opinion differs,if mgr was in the same situation as vijay he might have reacted the same way.
politician:a person who is active in party politics,will u call vadivelu a politician? he campaigned thats all.vijay adhukooda pannalai.how can u say he is a politician.screen panna vidathathu mattumdhan kaaranamnu ungalukku eppdi theriyum,are u from that ground?vera enna prachanainu naama yaarukkumae theriyathu.mediala podrathu ellam unmaiyum alla.some are true and some are not true.idha naandhan sollanuma?
Plum, unga point a naan fullaa accept pannikkuren. vijay is a pretender. athula enakku entha doubt um illai. aanaa ippo athai thirumba thirumba ovvoru issue varum pothum highlight panni enna use?!?
just now i read an interview, which dinamalar interviewed Cho Ramasamy about Sasikala Issue. Athula paarunga, makkaLai direct aa affect pannitrukkum issues - Paal vilai, bus fare rise and the planned Min KattaNa uyarvu. ithai pathi oru vaarthai antha nirubarum kekkalai, Cho vum pesalai.
So fourth pillar aana ivagaLukku kooda akkarai illai. Athai vittuttu oru political drama pathi thaan interest kaatturaanga. AvangaLoda ore intention ennanna, Jayalalitha ippo nallavanga aagittaanga appadinnu portray pannanum, thatsall.
Ippadi akkarai ilaama poli vesham podum mediakku munnaadi, vijay ellaam very very lesser animal. So absolutely no use of discussing this!
avar pannalainga....aana avar fans panninaanga.... prachaaram panninaanga...poster ottinaanga etc., etc., avar thatti ketkave illiyae... Ajith fans intha maathiri panninappa Ajith fans club aiye disband pannittaare..ivar atleast oru warning kooda kodukkala (koduthatha therila...may be internal ah warn pannirukkalam..appadi irunthiruntha i dont know)
but benefit of doubt Vijay ku kodukkanum...... most of the things that is being done in the name of Vijay (anna hazara, neyveli kootam, makkal iyakkam) all directed by SAC i suppose........ on the belief that his son will be a successful hero in politics as well
aana inga niraya peru unmai nu therinjum (business interests decide whether to make a protest, even if it is token, or not) vittu kodukkama pesittu irukkanga.... but ok....athuvum oru vagai la healthy than..as long as they only defend their favorite against the supposed attackers and dont start believing that themselves.....