A shame

haiyoooooo :lol:

I sound like some priest and u sound like a person asking opinions :lol: (kidding)


ok here are MY opinions.

1. yes, marriage is just a social commitment. A person should stick to ONE PERSON with or without marriage. pre-marital sex or post-marital is SAME, if its with SAME PERSON.

2. I suppose hinduism support this. (Please lets not bring in religion here though.) It is not a wrong thing, if BOTH THE PARTNER agrees on this.

If one person wants love, THEN he or she gets hurt if sex is resorted to MORE AS A DUTY.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha

If one person wants love, THEN he or she gets hurt if sex is resorted to MORE AS A DUTY.

---

But love, as u once stated, need not nec. mean sex at all, rite.....?! :?

This might interest the participants of this discussion

http://www.ashleymadison.com/

Of course, the cake really goes to the mission statement.

“Freedom of speech and expression does not mean the freedom to be shameless.”

“The difference between animals and humans is a moral code. That’s why it’s okay for dogs to copulate on the street, not humans.”

This is from Pratiba Naitthani, 35-year old Mumbai college professor who says most of her salary goes into PILs(public interest litigations) against obscenity and vulgar content in the media.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pavalamani pragasam

most of her salary goes into PILs(public interest litigations) against obscenity and vulgar content in the media.

---

So is this PIL sum kind of a committee against obscenity in the media?? This is the 1st time I'm hearing of such a thing...... :?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lambretta

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha

If one person wants love, THEN he or she gets hurt if sex is resorted to MORE AS A DUTY.

---

But love, as u once stated, need not nec. mean sex at all, rite.....?! :?

---

love need not mean sex. I said WHEN BOTH PARTNERS AGREE its fine to indulge more as a duty for procreation.

If LOVE MEANS (ALSO) SEX to one of them, its the duty of the other to offer the same to him or her, WHEN THEY ARE COMMITTED.

Also the question asked was,

CAN SEX BE RESORTED TO WITHOUT LOVE, for procreation sake?!?!?

So its SEX AS A DUTY WITHOUT LOVE...which is being spoken about and not vice versa!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha

love need not mean sex. I said WHEN BOTH PARTNERS AGREE its fine to indulge more as a duty for procreation.

If LOVE MEANS (ALSO) SEX to one of them, its the duty of the other to offer the same to him or her, WHEN THEY ARE COMMITTED.

---

I agree, but not if it happens to be beyond the other's capability/feasibility, in which case the partner shud try & understand & not seek it w/ desperation/as a TOP priority! :)

Quote:

---

So its SEX AS A DUTY WITHOUT LOVE...which is being spoken about and not vice versa!!

---

Hmm.....ok, got tat! :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lambretta

I agree, but not if it happens to be beyond the other's capability/feasibility, in which case the partner shud try & understand & not seek it w/ desperation/as a TOP priority! :)

---

I agree with u. True. Priority should always be affection and care towards partner and NOT otherwise. :smile:

Sadly lambretta, the world is not the same anymore. Not many share these ideas :sad:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha

Sadly lambretta, the world is not the same anymore. Not many share these ideas :sad:

---

Yea, saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadly true!! COLD HARD reality!! :( :cry: :evil:
I've incidentally nearly lost wat all hope I had even in Indian marriages......! :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lambretta

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha

Sadly lambretta, the world is not the same anymore. Not many share these ideas :sad:

---

Yea, saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadly true!! COLD HARD reality!! :( :cry: :evil:
I've incidentally nearly lost wat all hope I had even in Indian marriages......! :(

---

Get married and worry then that you are married - the other alternative!

Bob Marley once sang "No woman no cry" - He was damn right, lamby. Believe me!