geno (@ 61.2*) on: Thu Oct 21 14:50:46 EDT 2004
¸Å¢¨¾ ±ýÀÐ communication-¾¡ý.
¦¸¡ïºõ ¾¡ÊÁ£¨º¦ÂøÄ¡õ Ó¨ÇòÐ, þÕÀò¨¾ó¨¾ ¸¼ó¾ ÅÂШ¼Â ¬ñ - ¾ý §º¡¸ò¾¢Öõ ܼ ¦À¡Ð þ¼í¸Ç¢ø «Øžü¸¡É ºã¸ «ÛÁ¾¢ þø¨Ä ±ýÀ¾¡ø - øº¢ÂÁ¡ö þÃ×ò ¾¨Ä¨½¨Â ¿¨ÉòÐì ¦¸¡ñ§¼ ÀÎò¾¢ÕôÀÐ §À¡Ä - º¢Ä ¸Å¢¨¾¸û §À¡÷¨ÅìÌû «Ø¨¸ þÕì¸ìÜÎõ...º¢ÄÅüÈ¢ø ¬üÈ¡¨Á - º¢ÄÅüÈ¢ø §ÅÚ ÅÊÅí¸Ç¢ø þý¦É¡ÕŧáΠÀ¸¢÷ý†¤ ¦¸¡ûÇÅ¢ÂÄ¡ ¯½÷Ũĸû, º¢ÄÅüÈ¢ø ºã¸ì §¸¡Àõ...ÁüÈÅüÈ¢ø ¾ñ½£÷ ¦¾¡ðÊìÌû ̾¢òÐ ¬ð¼õ §À¡Î¸¢È º¢ÚÅÉ¢ý þÁ¡Ä ÌÚõÒî ºó§¾¡„õ...
¬É¡ø ±øÄ¡ì ¸Å¢¨¾Ôõ - ²§¾¡ ´Õ ¦¾¡É¢Â¢ø, ¦Á¡Æ¢Â¢ø ºí¸¾¢¸¨Ç communicate ¦ºö§Š¦ºö¸¢ýÈÉ.
SETI project ¬ð¸û §À¡Ä "¨†Â¡ ÅóÐÕîÍ ²Ä¢Âý º¢ìÉø" - ±ýÚ ²¾¡ùÐ ÀØÐÀð¼ º¡ðʨÄðÊý ÌÇÚÀÊ ´Ä¢¨Âì §¸ðΠ̾¢ì¸¢ÈÐõ ¿¼ìÌõ!
À¨¼ôÒò¾¡ý - «ó¾ ±ØòÐ ²üÀÎòи¢È Á¡Â ¯½÷Ũĸû¾¡ý Ó츢Âõ; À¨¼ôÀ¡Ç¢ ܼ ¦ÅÚõ ´Õ ¸ÕÅ¢¾¡ý!
þó¾ ¬¾¡Ã Å¢„Âõ ÒâóÐÅ¢ð¼¡ø - "¦Á¡Æ¢ìÌ Å¡º¨É ¯ñ¦¼ýÀÐõ, ±ØòÐì¸Ù¼ý ÌÊò¾Éõ ¿¼ò¾ þÂÖõ ±ýÀÐõ" - ¨ÅÃÓòÐ ¦º¡ýÉÐ §À¡Ä - ÒâóÐÅ¢Îõ!
±ýÉ Àì¸ò¾¢ø þÕôÀÅ÷¸û - ¦¸¡ïºõ ´ÕÁ¡¾¢Ã¢ô À¡÷òÐ ¾ûÇ¢ô§À¡öÅ¢ÎÅ¡÷¸û!!!
Cygnus (@ pcp0*) on: Thu Oct 21 16:58:46 EDT 2004
Hello Shakthi, after a long time :-) I've been around but never got a chance to say hi. I like both the versions.
I can't venture an elaborate review like geno but I think the second version shows more of melancholic undercurrent buried in graphic imagery whilst the first one was more strightforward yet pithy.
malligai (@ 63-2*) on: Thu Oct 21 17:20:56 EDT 2004
þô§À¡ ¿¡ý ±ýÉ §¸ð§¼ýÛ þò¾¨É explanation??
«Ð×õ þó¾ tone-la??
//±ýÉ «Îò¾ º¢ñÎ ÓʾÖìÌò ¾Â¡Ã¡¸¢È£÷¸Ç¡?!! //--«Îò¾
º¢ñÎ Óʾø???...so when was my first one??...u think i dont have anything else to do??
casual-a comments eludiyathuku thevai thaan enaku!!
geno (@ 61.2*) on: Thu Oct 21 17:52:49 EDT 2004
ayyo!
pOchA!!
neenga - antha kavithaikkum, en vimarsanathukkum - enna thodarbunnu - nakaichuvaiyAka kEttathu pOla thOnriyathAL - nAnum - adutha 'sindu mudithalA' enRu nakaichuvaiyAkak kuRippittEn!! (munthi idhu pOla neengaL Arambikkavillai! AnAl maRRavarkaL seithirukkiRArkaL!)
en viLakkathukum ippadi ethirvinaiyA!!!
:=)))
geno (@ 61.2*) on: Thu Oct 21 18:04:46 EDT 2004
´Øí¸¡ ¾Á¢Æ¢ø ±Ø¾¢ Å¢ÎÅÐ ¯ò¾Áõ!
ÁøÄ¢¨¸,
¿£í¸û :
>> Geno,
nice explanation as usual...but is this for the kavidhai?? >>
e±ýÚ §¸ðÊÕó¾£÷¸û «øÄÅ¡?!!...«¨¾ §ÅÊ쨸¡¸ì §¸ðÊÕ츢ȣ÷¸û ±ýÚ ±ñ½¢ - ¿¡Ûõ §ÅÊ쨸¡¸ "º¢ñÎ Óʾġ?!!" ±ýÚ §¸ð§¼ý!
«ùÅÇ×¾¡ý Å¢„Âõ!
À¢ÈÌ ±Ø¾¢Â Å¢Çì¸õ - ӾĢø ¿¡ý ±Ø¾¢Â Å¢Á÷ºÉòÐìÌ -
À¢ýÒÄÁ¡É ±ý ¸ÕòÐì¸û ÌÈ¢ò¾Ð..«ùÅÇ×¾¡ý!
þó¾ Ó¨È ºÃ¢Â¡¸î ¦º¡øĢŢð¦¼ý ±ýÚ ¿õÒ¸¢§Èý.
:=)
malligai (@ 63-2*) on: Fri Oct 22 14:35:39 EDT 2004
thats ok, just forget it...i always jump to conclusions...
:)
Shakthiprabha (@ 202.*) on: Sun Oct 24 23:55:12 EDT 2004
malligai, geno, cygnus(I have never said a hi to u too....so here is my biggggg hiiii), and BOOLOGARAMBAI
thx one and all.
Geno that exp was WONDERFUL.
Though I would like to give a second reading, delve deep into my conscience and say....
Even unidimensional kavithais CAN be reached out, can
create a sense of belonging amidst readers. Probably one has to be a wellversed poet to do it.
When someone talks about NAAN, EN UNARVU, a reader reading it also reads it as NAAN, EN UNARVU, and not
AVAL OR AVAN or avargaL unarvugaL! So where is the question of blocking the sense of belonging?
Shakthiprabha (@ 202.*) on: Mon Oct 25 00:25:26 EDT 2004
¸¡¾ø ¦ºöŨ¾ Å¢ðÎŢι¸û
_____________________
ÀÄ ÅÕ¼òÐ ¾ØõҸǡö À¾¢ó¾ À¾¢×¸û
¬È¢Â ýí¸Ç¢ý ¬Æò¾¢ø ¬È¡ ¿¢¨É׸û
ÅÕ¼í¸û ÅØ츢즸¡ñÎ µÊ µð¼ò¾¢Öõ
«ò¾¨ÉÔõ «ôÀʧÂ
Ò¾¢¾¡ö À¾¢×¸û ²üÈ þ¾Âí¸Ùõ
ÍÁìÌõ ¾ØõÒ¸Ùõ Á¡È¡Á§Ä
º¢Äâý ¸¡¾ø º¢Ö¨Å§ÂÚõ
º¢ÄÐ ¸ÕÅ¢ø ¸Å¢¨¾Â¡ö ¦¾¡¼Õõ
§ºÃ¡¾ ¦¿ïºí¸û º¢Ä
¸¡¸¢ì¸Å¢¨¾¸û ŨÃÔõ
geno (@ 61.2*) on: Mon Oct 25 03:39:47 EDT 2004
shakthi,
>> When someone talks about NAAN, EN UNARVU, a reader reading it also reads it as NAAN, EN UNARVU, and not
AVAL OR AVAN or avargaL unarvugaL! >>
u r absolutely right!
Infact i have said something which more agrees with this view than contradicting it :=)
suresh (@ ras-*) on: Mon Oct 25 06:36:16 EDT 2004
:-)
aha... shakthi... !!!!!! good to see you back again.
:-)
