Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
quality means (IMO)
1) Good recording quality,
2) all songs having unifrom influence over u in the movie,
3) general standard of the songs( lyrics, non-dappakuthu)
for example u quoted chahe pandit ho song as a good song but i cant agree on that..........compare it with nee partha song there is a big drop.....but take the case of punnagai mannan, all songs were just great..that is a quality album....if u look at ARR's albums u'll find more effort in each and every song whereas in IR's songs, u wud find 1 gr8 song and another mediocre song........ in meera also, oru rotulathan/mannenna song is utter crap compared to butterfly song.....
neways nilavu do u know that Greame Hick scored more first class centuries than Brian Lara.....but in international level Brian Lara is wat we know all.....so IR is like Greame Hick and ARR is Brian Lara......okkkkk
dunt call me a loser okkk u gaati.......
look at my list .....i have given more than 100 standard albums of ilayaraja....ok...u may take out pandian and some other albums...
yet u can find 100+ quality albums
by ur definition
1)good recording quality---ir has done with what he has got at his period.....after 30 years arr songs will look like badly recorded songs...will u say arr has given low standard songs
2)all songs has uniform influence---in my list u can find lots and lots of films where ir has given 6 great songs in one movie
3)general standard of songs---lyrics---
1)mukkala mukabula
2)petarap
3)take it easy oorvasi
4)mami song in new
these are all great thathuva paadalgal...... :lol: :lol: look at ur back first...its after arr's entry to tamil field..,lyrics lost its importance...
atlast....,greame hick and lara....
i accept ir is greame hick with most number of first class centuries...
but is arr a lara??...certainly not...tell me one international album which rocked international level...he has given only bombay dreams ...that too from his old songs....dont ever dream that arr is similar to lara in world cricket