From where the Indian Government gets its definition, what is the original source of the definition? Is there any definition of Hindus in the Indian constitution? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Surya
Printable View
From where the Indian Government gets its definition, what is the original source of the definition? Is there any definition of Hindus in the Indian constitution? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Surya
Hmmm..Not sure. :oops: Why does it matter to the discussion, if we're going to use that definition for the discussion? :)
Eelavar,
PURRRFECT!! :thumbsup: :D
Is it very hard to understand ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Surya
They murdered the Father Of The Nation and still justify publicly. If not for The Mahatma there is no "India" as we know today man ! How can you expect India to be lenient on people who have a murderous history. In fact it is time for a genocide of the fanatics. Simple Government bans seem to be very in-effective. Sure anyone can be patriotic and take weapons and parade. But that is when the government is unable to protect the people. What case have you got to let them parade with weapons against 10%population scattered in small pockets who are economically and socially weaker ? Does it make any sense ?
If you are talking about Islamic terrorists, it is a different story. Any one who terrorizes should be treated with the same law. Behind closed doors, some people can worship them as martyrs of freedom fighters and so on. But the Hindutvadis do not even qualify for becoming heroes because 10% of people do not form the government. What are they against ? THERE IS NO REASON FOR YOUR MOVEMENT AND AS SUCH IT WILL DIE. Any success that you desire should depend on the people's ignorance and nothing more. They have to create new issues every day or else the movement is dead. With increase in eduction and awareness among people, your movement will die. There can be even a genocidal action against them by the people.
This thread is "Hindu Genocide" created by the Hindutvas. So let them define Hindus for us. Let them be very specific. Let them tell us who those people are who were killed in the genocide.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohit
Krishna killed Shiva many times and Shivaites still want their revenge against Krishna and his followers.
Shiva humiliated and enslaved Dhaksha and Dhaksha's supporters want their share of revenge. Descendants of Sukhriva want their share of revenge against those who depicted them as monkeys.
Descendants of Ravana want their share of revenge against Ram who could have been only a petty king not significant enough to be recorded in the history. Ravana is described as a great king and his country is described as well forted, his people are well civilized and cultured and there was no Ram or Sita in their story. In every way their description seems to be very realistic. Mr. Ram's nation is described as no bigger than a village and yet it is the whole world for those who wrote about him. They claim an encounter with Ravana and killing him btw. Should the relatives of Ravana not take their revenge against those who wrote and worship this village-boy ? They belive these people have been force converted into Ram worship at the end of the sword.
Then there are Dhuryodhan worshipers , like me, who want to take their revenge on Krishna and his followers. In everyway Dhuryodhan is our hero. He was a great adminstrator and never fell short of being a good ruler. He had the best brains of those days to advice him. People had no grievances and were very happy. He had demonstrated excellent overseas relationships with other states like Orissa, Andhra and Karnataka. Bhishma himself who was the rightful heir to the throne was with him. He did not let the Pandavas rule because they were very intolerant to "inferior" humans like chariot drivers. They lived a luxurious life in Indraprasta while their people lived in forests. And this man Krishna supports these Pandavas. His people rewrite history, copy the Buddhist scriptures and re-tell it in bogus Mahabharat versions as Krisha's own Gita. I would myself like a genocidal action on them as they still continue their old habit of re-writing the history.
Now there are people like Rohit who say the central theme of Hinduism is Karma which blames people's status in this world for their sins. A low caste man is born so because of his sins in the previous birth and so their condition is very much justifiable. The in-laws blame the widow's sins in her previous birth for taking the life of the husband and her birth as a woman itself is a reult of her Karmic sins in her previous births she deserveds to be burnt and owned and all the BS ! The women, sudras and the animals want to take their revenge on those who insulted them.
IF YOU CALL ALL OF US AS HINDUS, WE FEEL THAT YOU ARE FORCE CONVERTING US INTO SOME UNKNOWN RELIGION.
Hey Guys,
You all forget one thing when talking about minorities...There are many hindu minorities throughout the world including Arab countries. So when you go allout against minorities in India, please remember your own countrymen are living in another country as minorities. So tolerance should be the word and not intolerance.
Our leaders know this... that's why they try to protect the minorities. It may sound a little selfish...
This title is even more provocative ! :oops:
Wondering how MODS have spared this one ! :(
Arul, :)
No one here is all out against minorities to begin with. :)
Selva,
What is provocative? Weren't Hindus Being Persecuted for their religion a result of the Islamic/Mogul Invasions in India? :huh:
Since the whole thread started on the basis of Francois Gautier's book, here is an article abt the same. Hope it opens some eyes.
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/m...0801870300.htm
Exactly!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by selvakumar
The mods look like Hindutva and casteist apologists themselves.
"No casteist or religious bashings please", they would say but Islam bashing is fine for them :banghead: :banghead: