yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Prabhu Ram
infact thats a certificate for his versatility after a considerable number of films
Printable View
yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Prabhu Ram
infact thats a certificate for his versatility after a considerable number of films
What do you guys really define versatility as? As one who plays different type of roles or one who could give the required performance for any movie he acts in as even for a similar role screenplay can be different.
I consider the latter a much effective way of deciding a actor. The former only defines type of roles but not necessarily how good the actor is.
Hulk,
One who plays different roles convincingly as against someone who might be part of different kinds of films playing different roles but not convincingly
Mahanadhi, EvanO oruvan, yaavarum nalam etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
May be he is too young (or at least looks so)..
hulkster,
no actor has defined a comfort zone-a?
madhavan - chocolate boy
alaipayuthe,minnale,dum dum dum,run,nala dhamayandhi,jay jay
paadhi padam chocolate boythan
i dont understand...u mean family man?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerd
then goundamani could be rated as the best actor ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulkster
"nala dhamayandhi" - A very decent attempt. Adhu chocolate boy madhiri theriliye. Can't see anybody else (other than Kamal) doing justice to that role apart from Maddy
"Run" - Adhula angry young man dhaane
Thats not exactly comfort zone, they maybe similar in themes but differ in actual performance required. jay jay and minnale were quite similar but the rest were different.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
for me atleast
alaipayuthe,minnale,dum dum dum and jay jay ae similar