Solomon ranted:
Quote:
"Iyenthiram Niranthe Tholkappiyar " says Panamparanar;
Thol- 880, Thol1570, Kappiyar refers Ariyam, hence we can conclude that Sanskrit has established considerably in Tholkappiyar' period. Page 40 same book.
What made you think that 'Ariyam' of Tholkappiyar means 'Sanskrit'?? You are desperately wrong there!
Quote:
Four Vedas or Nanmarai, arangam, agamametc., means Sanskrit works and the word Anthanar in Tholkappiyam and all Tamil Sagnam and later books except refers to Aryan Brahmins only- Page 101, Tamilar Matham.
Devaneyan further in his book Oppiyan Mozhinool says- "s Panamparanar refers him knowing FourVedas, Iyenthiram and Kappiyar differenciates Vadasol Grammer with Tamil and that TholKappiyar made Arangetram before AthangottuAsan, all confirm that Tholkappiyar is A Brahmin."
That is another of your fraudulent twist of Pavanars words. Post the original words of Pavanar in Tamil - for hubbers to see! YOu won't dare, would you, Solomon.
Quote:
Tholkappiyar is dubiously dated to 700BCE by Devaneyan, with no reason given, but objective scholoars who look at Tholkappiyar- giving Grammer for Wrting, means advanced stage of North Indian brought Brammi letters i.e., 200-150B.C.E.
Who are the 'objective scholoars' you talking about? And why does it make you so happy to date Tholkappiam after Panini?? YOur anti-Tamil sentiments? Take care, my dear Solomon!
Quote:
I request all to maintain dignity on commenting on Scholars, One is talking so uglyly of UU.VE.SA and other on Iravatham Mahadevan.
The pains taken by Uvesa got us Tholkappiyam and Sangam Literature, which otherwise could have lost, and his honest serch of Originals are fully appreciated. Iravatham Mahadevan was the first to decipher Tamil from BArahmi scripts and has also deciphered Indus-Saraswathi scripts.
Lets leave Mahadevan aside now, afterall his mentor was Pavanar - who taught him etymology of Tamil words. etc. But U.V.SA Iyer????????
UVSa did take some pains at the same time, as all brahmins do, did some intentional corruption to the Sangam works and Tholkappiam to give Sanskrit and Brahmins a bit of 'glory' down there. This was pointed out by Dr. Veeramani (Dravida Kazaga Chief) in his book 'veRukkathakkathE bramanIyam'.
Quote:
Tamil is such a wonderful Language, whose highllights can be said for pages and nobody needs to FaLsely belittle other Indian language and India' equal pride Sanskrit.
YOu just leave Tamils alone! They are happy with their language and heritage - even it was borne as late as last night. Just don't come around singing the 'greatness' of Sanskrit to us! We can't bear the stench! We know too much of your Sanskritic lies too!
Quote:
Most of the European Universities have intited Closing Tamil Departments and these myths of splitting words only Paint that we are Frauds.
Which are the 'most of the Eurupean UNiversities'?? And what is the read reason. There are dating frauds in Sanskritic History more than any history. eg, the Vedas are 8000 years old. Ramayana being 1.75 million years old. (The dinosaurs did not even know that)
Quote:
Any Literature dating can be referred from
www.wikhipedia.com and that is the opinion of All MAjor Universities of the World, any falsehood spread by few are spreading Hatered meaninglessly.
We do not have a single Tamil Literature before Sanskrit has taken route as I showed.
Major Universities, wow! So we don't have Tamil LIterature before Sanskrit. So what is the big deal.
Tamils have Thirukkural - they love it - the world best book on Humanism
Sanskrit have ManuSmriti - the worlds greatest book on racisim and castism.
Tamils have 'Anbe Sivam' - Thirumanthiram
Sanskrits have - The vedas - books on robbery, treachery and plunder on the natives.
I can go on, Solomon! yes on and on and on!