Quote:
So there is something more subtle that looks at the flower, than the matter (body- here it is eye). We call it as mind. Mind is nothing but thoughts. The mind (manas) has various thoughts."
How does one define a thought, exactly. The electrical impulse can be shown to stimulate a thought, but it is not the impulse that is the source of the thought. The impulse is simply a stream of ions (electrically charged atoms); so to say that the impulse is causing the thought is to say that atoms have a mind of their own, which is not true. Some will argue, thoughts stem from the evolution, that the reason we "think" is because it is necessary for our survival. But we are still "thinking" when we sleep, which is why dream. And dreams obviously serve no evolutionary function. So there must be a more consistent explanation for the origin of the "thoughts."
Quote:
This intellect grows out of experience and the one that is aware of the changes of this intellect, is still more subtler and is called is called awareness or "Chit". But this awareness is conditional which means , it is expressed based on the "body" vehicle it assumes.
Can you explain why the intellect grows at different rates, for different individuals. This is one of the great unresolved debates in science, how much a person is a product of what he has inherited from his parents and great-grandparents (genes), and how much he is a product of his environment (what you term as experience). Even scientists admit, though, that they cannot explain how a gene will transmit an "ability" from one to another. Example, take one who sits at the piano since the age of 4 and is said to have extroardinary ability (can write and play music without formal training). If we look at a gene to try to understand this explanation, we are faced with the same dilemna as before. The gene, at the most basic level, depends on the nature of the combinations of lifeless atoms (molecules) combining. But it cannot be denied that parents can pass on certain abilities to children, even if the source of the transmission cannot be uniquely pinpointed. Is it lack of understanding as to the gene, or is there some more.
Quote:
Nonetheless, there is the subtlest unconditional awareness which is the fundamental of all the above body, mind, intellect and awareness. This is called as Consciousness. So the body, mind, intellect and awareness when operate we call it as life. When awareness drops, we say it is dead, no life. Awareness"Shiva" then becomes "Shava".
To know all the aspects of body, mind, lntellect, awareness we have to tranncend from the gross body to subtle mind to subtlier intellect and to the subtlest awareness and finally to Consciousness. The irony is that all these are only Consciousness, but because of our ignorance we do not know this.
Does one need to have intellect to have life? There are many who lie in what is termed a "coma." Basically a deep sleep that can last 20 years even. But they are still alive; one can see this from the recorded pulses of the EKG machine. Is it not better to say, consciousness gives life and intellect is the fulfillment of life. Awareness; that is a complex question. If one meditates, he may be aware of his past lives. But when he opens his eyes, he is only aware of the reality that the five senses present to him. So what is the true awareness? And from what I just wrote, is it okay to say that consciousness is not simply what we percieve with our senses, but everything we have experienced in all of our past lives. Because along the lines of what you said, the senses merely percieve, it is the intellect that forms the thought.
Quote:
Awareness is that conditioned Consciousness perceiving a conditioned consciousness in the form of flower. But when I say "I" am looking at a flower , then it is Ego.
So perhaps it is awareness that is serving the evolutionary function. As you say, awareness is "conditioned Consciousness." We are conditioned to be aware of our surroundings.
Quote:
"Many modern Neurologits (like Dennett for example) miss the whole understanding because they think Consciousness is generated or located in the brain. It is awareness that is generated by the neuronal firing. The difference of life and death is only the difference of Awareness and Cosnciousness. Consicousness is not localised , it is everything, the living and dead. it is unchanging. It is the awareness that changes based on the interaction fo biomolecules."
I agree with you that consciousness is neither generated nor located in the brain. The brain works in conjunction with the other five senses. Awareness is simply the senses telling the brain to generate an appropriate reponse. This cannot explain how one is able to see into his past lives, for example. The brain is confined to what one has experienced in the past life. Consciousness is not bounded by any time limitation.