Plantonic relatilonships WORK.
on very long runs too.
Most of u are too young to understand that.
If love is true, IT NEVER GETS BORING.
Printable View
Plantonic relatilonships WORK.
on very long runs too.
Most of u are too young to understand that.
If love is true, IT NEVER GETS BORING.
SP akka...i might have to say something about age...age should not be used as a factor of understanding what happens around us...rather how we interpret it should be used as a factor...age is just development...but the mind start learning since we start to feel our surroundings.
Love never gets boring...the moment you have started embracing a person's character and their care for you...it is a life long journey...it can never get boring unless it is a infatuation which totally rules out love.
what is the love between mother and child .. of course there is no "lust"Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan
there will be a lust in love as love stats with lust mostly!
but not always a love in lust
what ever i dont believe in lust in love!i believ love is more than love!Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan
as u said iam too young :?: to understand those things, but when i grew up :roll: i will write my opinion on this!
check out this site
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/hottopics/love/
do you agree with what the BBC site on relationships
Three stages of love
1) lust
2) attraction
3) attachment
omg i just realised that my head teacher doesn't write any of her assemblys!!!!!!
last term...feb 14th..cos it was valentines day...the weeks assemble theme was love...and that says exactly what she said! and then she also read out the whole of those other 5 pages on that link!
omggggg!
The theory goes that the more sex a couple has, the deeper their bond becomesQuote:
Originally Posted by r_o_j_a
i completely believe this... :P
:banghead: :banghead:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rachel
Ya... That is the truth too... Atleast in the initial years of bonding. & a practical approach too :thumbsup:
:banghead: :banghead:Quote:
Originally Posted by Unicorn
Selva machi !
Could anyone give us a bried description of the topic? :roll:
:banghead: :banghead: idhukku unicornae better!Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbird
not only in initial years.... :roll: throughout the marriage life :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by selvakumar
where there is will there is a way :roll:
But wat if one is not able to, u know- perform accordingly even initially? Does the bond not deepen otherwise? :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by selvakumar
Then how practical wud tat be, guys? :huh:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rachel
I meant it will play a major role in the initial years. & ofcourse throughout the life too. But the intensity is minimal.
Got tat macha........but my qsn. wat if one of the partners is not able to be satisfactory even in the initial stage?? :?Quote:
Originally Posted by selvakumar
:lol: :lol: good question 8-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Lambretta
definitly it will be act as a trouble in achieving 100% Best out of the relationship. We might have strange exceptions. But The reality is: If they were capable of getting that, then it would have been much more better than what their present situation could be. :oops:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lambretta
Not only this, any other crinkles in a realtionship can also be ironed out by LOVE.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lambretta
Thats why its said that love and lust go hand in hand.
Ok, from my experience, I have grown to love my wife more after marriage ( after physical contact)- Now, I realise what I had towards her before is nothing compared to what I have now- now its like I just can't live without her ( no- not for the sex) but the mental bond that sex brings in. But if she can't have sex with me later on due to some mishap( God forbid), that does not mean, I'll leave her.
kids allowed to this topic! :?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghlli
Hmm.....yea tat makes sense too I s'pose....:)Quote:
Originally Posted by dsath
Who says kids've got to be like kids nowadays?! :P :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by nilavupriyan
excellent answer lamby! :lol:
:poke: @ moonpriyan :poke:
8-) :twisted:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghlli
enaaa :rotfl: