i watched that movie nerd...
it was so manly...
Printable View
i watched that movie nerd...
it was so manly...
yes online param(1)
sid.... :)
i know i am in a diff state of mind...
work from home... and my next room friend is playing ARR songs...
life is bliss... wat more do i need...
cr :) & ;)
The dialogues play a vital part in keeping audiences intact while the background score by Yuvan Shankar Raja is far beyond excellence.
The climax is brilliant and something unpredictable
+1....
met sp charan @escape cinemas....nalla pesunaru...uncut version DVD la release panuvangalam ..
சப்ப ஆம்பள தான் ஆனா எல்லாம் ஆம்பளைங்கலும் சப்ப தான் ...haha
Pavithrasri on rediff gives a 3 on 5
There is nothing wrong with movie nor anything great. So many shots/sequences/knots have been copied from various movies, unlike tarantino they haven't been just referenced and used for bigger fun but just like ordinary tamil films they have been used in the movie. Cinematography mirattal. Sampath, the kid and his dad were amazing. AGS villivakkam la only 4 rows were filled. The theater too was samma mokke so will try writing more after tmrw's show at sathyam. Personally, I wasn't very pleased. Some dialogs were brilliant, some subtle underlining threads were nice but overall a very mediocre film. Too much style over substance which was almost none.
Movie doesn't do justice to the 1st teaser trailer.
Behidwoods - 3.5/5
Yuvan's music got thumbs up all over.. :2thumbsup:
The movie is in my must watch list for Yuvan :)
தமிழில் வெகுநாட்களுக்கு அப்புறம் உலகத்தரத்தில் ஒரு படம். டைட்டில் கார்ட் போட்டாக வேண்டுமே என்பதற்காக எந்த பின்னணி இசையும் இல்லாமல் சப்பென்று ஓடும் டைட்டில்லில் துவங்குகிறது அதகளம். தமிழ் சினிமாவின் எந்த மரபுக்குள்ளும் அடங்காத காட்சியமைப்புகள், தொழில்நுட்ப நேர்த்தி, சட்டென்று கடந்து செல்லும் 'பளீர்' வசனங்கள் என்று பல 'பிளஸ்'கள். அங்கங்கே தெறித்து விழும் கெட்ட வார்த்தைகள் மட்டும் பெண்களை திரையரங்கிற்கு வராமல் தடுக்கும்.
பக்கத்து சீட்டில் கேட்டது..
கணவர்: இவர்தாண்டி ஹிந்தி ஹீரோ Jackie Giraffe. முன்னாடி எல்லாம் பொண்ணுங்களுக்கு அவர் மேல அப்படி ஒரு graze.
மனைவி: அதென்னங்க Giraffe?
கணவர்: நல்ல உசரமா இருக்கார்ல. அதனால அப்படி பேரு வச்சுருப்பான்களோ என்னமோ!!
ottu kaekkraddhukku 100 ruva selavu panni theatreku poraanga...
Listen to 19 Cues from Yuvan Shankar Raja's mindblowing background score in Aaranya Kaandam
http://www.backgroundscore.com/2011/...und-score.html
சத்யாஜி,
கண்டிப்பாக பாருங்க.. Guy Ritchie படம் பார்த்த மாதிரி இருக்கு.. ரெண்டாவது வாட்டி பாக்குற ஐடியா வேற இருக்கு எனக்கு.
கெட்ட வார்த்தை பிடிக்கும்னா நீங்க இந்த படம் ப்ளூ ரே வாங்கி வச்சுக்கலாம்.. ஒரு சாம்பிள்..
அஜய் ராஜ்: போன்ல யாருண்ணே? அண்ணியா?
சம்பத்: இல்ல.. ***..
ரெண்டாவது வாட்டி பாக்குற ஐடியா வேற இருக்கு எனக்கு
+1...
சம்பத் : உங்க அப்பாவ ரொம்ப பிடிக்குமா ???
கொடுக்காபுளி : அப்டிலாம் இல்லை..... அவர் எங்க அப்பா ....
padam gethu.. Kodukapuli and Kaalai :thumbsup:
Absolutely recommended. The voice may not be unique (though it certainly is unique to our cinema) but the song is, without a shred of doubt, entertaining. Thagiriyamaa ticket edunga.
I felt the film is missing some pace. Lot of good scenes and all the threads are tied so neatly, but overall it wasn't much satisfying. TK should have avoided voice overs and characters explaining what was already shown. May be my opinion will change after a rewatch.
Watched it the second time. Dialogues, casting, cinematography and BGM are the saving graces of the film which will make everyone say this to be a world class film and turn it into a blockbuster. But is it a film which has substance? Is it a film which showcases characters? Is it a film which will make you emote even for a second?
I couldn't find a single place where the director had said something by himself. The whole movie seems like a combination of nice scenes from a collection of other movies. Nothing seems original. Everything seems to be borrowed from so many people like QT, Inarittu, Sergio Leone, Meirelles etc etc. Even the Jackie Sheroff's plot is a complete ripoff from a chinese movie called Ju Dou. The idea of Sampath tricking the gangs is lifted from Yojimbo. The best thing about this movie is the cinematography but it is more like looking at photographs of north chennai than it helping in telling the story. I heard people saying "this shot was nice" "that shot was nice" but when people start viewing a movie shot by shot for its beauty that is when a director and cinematographer fail. Apart from the characters and locations the audience shouldn't be seeing anything. Using voice-over isn't a bad thing completely but all of a sudden changing the movie's narrative style, that too 15 mins before the climax, makes no sense.
What I cant stand is people calling Nandalala a ripoff but not this. People are giving standing ovations for this but din't make Naan Kadavul run.
I expected a racy film and probably this is why I wasn't satisfied.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thiagarajan Kumararaja
Baradwaj Rangan's short take
With most mainstream films, especially in Tamil, you know some fifteen minutes in if they’re working for you (or not). These are the films made expressly with you in mind, thinking that they know what you want, the pandering productions. But there are a few that leave you hanging until almost the end – “Hmmm… I’m really enjoying this… But where is it going?… Am I really liking it (as an organic whole) or is it just the laughs giving me a high? – and then, gradually, things begin to cohere and reshape your entire thus-far experience, and you slap your forehead and smile and say wow! This is one of those films.