all heroines deserve scope period. Why only Simran.Quote:
she has to be fair, if Simran asks for scope, that's acceptable but sada?
Printable View
all heroines deserve scope period. Why only Simran.Quote:
she has to be fair, if Simran asks for scope, that's acceptable but sada?
He is a mass hero so he has to act in mass movies.
Why didn't vikram reject majaa?
sada is an actress, she could've rejected the film if she has no scope but it offers the hero to perform comedy sentiment and actions.. even thirupachi by vijay had lots of scope for vijay but nothing for Trisha.. vijay can't reject it.. only trish has to reject it because she has nothing..
even in anniyan, sada had nothing other than exposing her body.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidils
Kidis, YOu cannot say just like that. Even simran had done several masala movies . But that didn't end her career.
To be frank :- An actress career ending is in her hands and not in others.
If an actress has REAL TALENT, THEN HERE CAREER WON'T END... Otherwise, Only she must take the responsibility of having acted after taking the money
she acted because she had no other tamil films.. that's all :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by selvakumar
best directors like Maniratnam will ask Simran to perform than sada...Quote:
Originally Posted by kidils
o.k Thunderbird, Let's stop here.
:D
For sadha fans like sinthiya.. :)
I hope he doesn't give lame excuses. That's all.
Dude... do you have any idea how many films and how many years Simran acted before she got to act in KM.... that was like at the end of her career..... so don't go into that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbird
She wanted to act under a top banner like AVM and Perarausu was a hit maker... i don't see anything wrong with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbird