Printable View
Referring to that* thread which predictably turns into Nagesh is >> Gounder.. At least Hub has established Gounder as a comedian. Vivek/Vadivelu-lam better-nu oru general consensus irundadhu oru kAlathil-A :rotfl:Quote:
Originally Posted by kid-glove
idhellAm nInga pArthu appreciate paNNuvIngannu pOtta pOst Feeyaar? 9405-vOda 9406-A pOchuQuote:
Thangavelu better than nagesh? illaiyE irukka mudiyAdhE
(Note: my comment ends at the eye roll but just added a meaningless appendage in honour of thangavelu's style )
yEn indha edit-u. Oh, got it ! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Plum
Btw, neenga Nagesh-A 10-oda 11-aakiteenganu oru periya gendilman kanneer vittaaru andha thread'la. :lol:
One argument in that Nagesh-Gounds fight
When asked to substantiate his claims on Nagesh, someone gracefulyl withdraws thus:
"ippO nAn apdi list paNNinA argumentku paNdrA mAdhiri irukkum so some other time"
sema line - for reference to everyone, all time useful strategy
TheermaanA seriousA (Bruceleemyfriend) idhukku esplanation kuduthudarEn.Quote:
Originally Posted by Puliyan_Biryani
At the start of every thread I assume a serious sense of purpose. To somehow theorize and elaborate how this man is a cultural pinnacle. (iLaiyarAja paththi ellAm ivvaLO ezhudhuraangaLE...insert Singaravelan flautist attack quote here, nammALai pOdhumAna aLavu seriousA discuss paNNa maatraangaLEnnu oru aadhangam)
But quite soon, the sheer impossibilty of expression comes in the way followed by the inifinitely more enjoyable quote posting options.
We made the Rousappan, Doctor, Sindhanai Selvar, AnjAsingam labels out of love for his work but also in an attempt to be light and humorous. Hence the Socrates etc. (though quite seriously it can be said that Senthil is the one that carries the beacon of the Socratic method !)
I suggested postmodern parigAsagan very seriously.
We need not pick it finally as it may not strike a chord with many of the readers who want to drop by the thread. But let me shake of some of my seriousness now:
Look at me
Quote:
Perhaps the easiest way to start thinking about postmodernism is by thinking about modernism, the movement from which postmodernism seems to grow or emerge
Even modernists talk about the absurdity of it all in a longfaced manner. But behind it is the artist's ambition that he will breathe coherence into it all.Quote:
Modernism, tends to present a fragmented view of human subjectivity and history but presents that fragmentation as something tragic, something to be lamented and mourned as a loss. Many modernist works try to uphold the idea that works of art can provide the unity, coherence, and meaning which has been lost in most of modern life; art will do what other human institutions fail to do.
Postmodernism, in contrast, doesn't lament the idea of fragmentation, provisionality, or incoherence, but rather celebrates that. The world is meaningless? Let's not pretend that art can make meaning then, let's just play with nonsense.
The postmodernists is devastatingly negative. He punctures the artist's presumption. Disabuses us of any latent optimism.
சரி, தவறு, உறவுகள், உணர்வுகள், மகாத்மியங்கள், தார்மீகம், தன்மானம், சுயம் சார்ந்து சிந்தித்து கட்டமைத்துக்கொண்ட சகல விதமான புரிதல்கள், தனித்துவம், அதன் அடியிழையாக இருக்கும் மெல்லிய அகங்காரம் - எல்லாவற்றையும் ஈவிரக்கமின்றி பரிகாசம் செய்து நிலைதடுமாறச்செய்திருக்கும் ஒரு மகாகலைஞன் கவுண்டமணி.
ippo sollunga naNbargaLE, postmodern parigaasagan appidingra pattam sari dhaanE?
:clap: @ many places there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Plum
நாம ரெண்டு பேர் தான் அந்த crucial pointai latch on பண்ணிருக்கோமா- ரெம்ப சந்தேகமா இருக்கு.
நடுவுல 'ஒரு வேகத்துலயின் வெறியிலயின்' Thangu> Nageshனு ரெண்டு பிட் ஓடிச்சு. :lol: சண்டைல கிளியாத சட்ட எங்க இருக்கு.
This was the most inventive explanation for Feeyar's absence :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Thilagar
Great work SMI :clap:
LM, andha link-la nINgaLum kaLathula eRangi saNdai pOtturikkinga :)
Is it :lol: Padichu pakkaren :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Plum