selva i xpected this :lol: .....i was very unclear there....i'll try to knock some sense into my words.... :D
well in our society, losing virginity before marriage is condemnable act, okvaaa??? similarly copying/getting inspired/remixing songs is a condemnable act in musical terms, okvaaa??? but at which point shuld we start condemning these acts?? be it losing virginity or copying/inspiration/remix.......
for me,
inspirationcan be equated to "mere thinking" about sex.....i dunt find anything much wrong here.....but for ppl. of older gen they call it wrong......similarly, some real musical conservatives call inspiration itself wrong, isn't it???
copying can be equated to "acts of sex minus climax" which is somewhat hard to digest for me but still can let it go, but for many ppl. copying(or acts of sex) is highly condemnable.......they call it foul.....
remix can be equated to "losing virginity" in all sense, which i myself condemn........if u dunt have sarakku then only u'll resort to remix isn't it??? this is highly condemnable for me.......
so we just need to view
inspiration as mere bad thinking
copying as minor act of wrong doing
remix as real wronng act......
i hope it is clear this time..... :lol:
