I had the same impression. But considering Kubrick is a New yorker ( Even though Kubrick did settle down in England.) and this-is-his true "New york" film, I believe he had something to say about the city. He had kept it straight for the most part. I'm unaware of occults and discreet sex rituals of the upper crust, so maybe I couldn't absorb certain things. (the conspiracy is that he got killed by occult groups through some death wish ritual, when they got to know of this film. :lol: )Quote:
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Reg. Woody Allen comparison wrt. Infidelity. He made lighter films of serious, darker themes with attachment to his characters, much unlike Kubrick. Kubrick was vehement towards form as much as content and did something magical with the purest cinematic tool - Camera and tried to cut through the medium. Woody was more old school kind of guy who married classic European film making to New york (pseudo-intellectual) sensibilities. I don't think he wanted to be pretentious and fail, so he mostly kept to his natural talent - humour. Although I believe he has it in him to explore darker themes.
Btw Kubrick's favorite filmmaker is fellow New yorker Woody Allen. 8-)